As in Diigo 4.0 beta its easier to accidentally create multiple bookmarks of the same page (different treatment of # within URLs), so it's much more important for the community library for a site to be up-to-date.
If the library is inconsistent, it's impossible to tell whether other people are bookmarking alternative URLs for the same content.
http://www.diigo.com/community/site/skepticblog.org
* is missing the three bookmarks that are mentioned at
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1007223#4
all of which were made on
2009-10-16
* does include an item that was bookmarked
first on 2008-10-29 and
most recently on 2009-10-23
(different treatment of # within URLs),
so it's much more important for the community library for a site to be up-to-date.
If the library is inconsistent, it's impossible to tell whether other people are bookmarking alternative URLs for the same content.
To Top