A blog posting by Meredith Farkas, from a technology point of view. Includes basic technology skills/attitudes and higher level competencies, such as project management. This is the stuff she wishes someone had emphasized when she was in library school!
So how do you take these Digital Native realities and build a set of strategies that support your organization's digital initiatives, especially when technology is quickly and constantly shifting?
More information about our users and their expectations--and as a result, the skills we will need in order to make these new tools and experiences a reality.
"build your strategies to support the core values of your users, not to support the advancement of technology. " - Yes, but the article just showed how these values were shaped by technology, noting how the digital generation is different from older generations because of technology.
I think the "engagement, enrichment, and empowerment" ideas are really important for us and our future skill sets. We don't know how to do any of these really well, imo, (but especially the enrichment part) and we need to learn more techniques and strategies for interacting with our users in the spaces they prefer. Whether these user needs are the result of nature or nurture, we are going to have to pay attention to them if we want to continue to be of value.
Excerpt:
"Increasingly, in the scientific disciplines, information ranging from online journals to databases must be recent to be relevant, so Wideners collection of books, its miles of stacks, can appear museum-like. Likewise, Googles massive project to digitize all the books in the world will, by some accounts, cause research libraries to fade to irrelevance as mere warehouses for printed material. The skills that librarians have traditionally possessed seem devalued by the power of online search, and less sexy than a Google query launched from a mobile platform."
In 2008, WebJunction received support from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to develop a set of competencies for those managing public access computing in their libraries. As a follow-up to this work, we developed a full Competencies Index for the Library Field, which outlines the full spectrum of library practice. The Index was published in 2009, and since July 2009, we've been using this index to help us identify the topics library staff most need to develop new skills or support around. WebJunction's Competencies for Libraries outlines recent research we've completed in this area.
As research library leaders confront turbulent times, they sorely need new tools to facilitate thinking about the future of the institution and to foster dialogue within the community. ARL's new project seeks to envision library futures and will engage the Association's member community in looking decades out at the situations that will confront research libraries. At the heart of this work will be the creation of a set of future scenarios and a toolkit to facilitate research library leaders in their planning and decision making.
It will be interesting to see in twenty years if any of the scenarios pan out. Would someone doing scenarios twenty years ago have predicted just how digital today's libraries are?
These are my slides from the panel I did at TLA with Stephen Abram and John Blyberg.
You know, if you look at these slides, you will find out everything I am secretly planning! :-)
Interesting discussion of job description for new position at Karen Schneider's library. You can see the the 21st century librarian is going to have to know a lot about a lot in order to be able to function and to be successful...
In the 21st century, ARL libraries are increasingly exploring and adopting a range of new roles in serving research institutions, researchers, scholars, and students, making the time ripe for ARL to organize a new report cluster focusing on key new roles. The series will identify and delineate emerging roles and present research on early experiences among member libraries in developing the roles and delivering services.
In his 12 strategies to make libraries "fit" Bell, among other things, talks about smart innovation and gives examples of companies who weren't so smart.
Since the report isn't totally completed (i.e. I haven't finished my part), I have been fretting about whether/what we should do to update it. A lot has come out since we last met. Do others have thoughts? My mother is in hospice as of Wed. night and I am in and out right now. Melinda
include libraries, information centers, competitive intelligence units, intranet departments, knowledge resource centers, content management organizations, and others.
A. Managing Information Organizations
B. Managing Information Resources
C. Managing Information Services
D. Applying Information Tools and Technologies
Eric's current comments about his "old" posting:
In a slightly dated LITA-hosted blog posting [1] I addressed this question, and below are snippets from my reply:
1) XML - XML is a sort of modern-day alchemy.
2) Relational databases - Libraries love lists.
3) Indexing - Believe it or not, databases suck as facilitating
search, especially considering today's user expectations
regarding relevance ranking.
4) Web serving - Increasingly people expect to acquire the
information the require for learning, teaching, and research
through a Web browser.
5) Programming/scripting - Finally, you will want to "glue" all
of the above technologies together into a coherent whole.
Please do not be overwhelmed. All of these things can be learned
and practiced on your desktop or home computer. They lend
themselves better to server-class operating systems such a
Unix/Linux, but learning about these operating systems is
challenging in itself and not readily applicable to
librarianship. All you need is the ability to read books, the
desire to learn, and the time to do it.
Did you all see The Chronicle Review's question to scholars and their answers about what will be the defining idea of the next decade? From the titles of their responses it looks like a wide range of ideas.