Grant Wiggins explains why teacher planning for learning provides a framework for "clarifying purposes and the best means of causing them, in order to achieve the most satisfying outcomes."
The faculty resource "quick tip" page from Park University gives a concise view of incorporating authentic assessment along with traditional assessments of learning.
It takes more than collecting data or creating on computers to be a 21st century school. If educators are not having students publish regularly in thoughtful, authentic, and relevant places they are NOT preparing them for today or tomorrow.
If the students don't recognize assessments as a chance to show their learning, then these things aren't even assessments; they're something altogether alien to real learning. Fortunately, there are many approaches we can take within our own classrooms to change this situation.
A table illustrating the characteristics of various assessment tools on a continuum from more structured / de-contexualized to less structured / more contextualized.
A table adapted from Student-Involved Assessment for Learning that gives a picture of how appropriate various assessment methods are for a variety of learning target types
This article explains three specific actions that we can take to improve our questions. To begin with, we need to get students talking rather than the teacher talking. Second, prepare the questions when you plan the lesson. And third, scaffold the questions.
To improve formative assessment practices among both teachers and assessment designers, we need to look more closely at just what feedback is-and isn't.
What would happen if the roles were flipped and students asked the questions? Dan Rothstein and Luz Santana document a step-by-step process to help students formulate and prioritize questions about nearly everything.
The taxonomy presented here provides scaffolding for teachers as they consider how to best structure Social Studies learning activities, and how to best support those activities with educational technologies.
The taxonomy presented here provides scaffolding for teachers as they consider how to best structure Secondary English learning activities, and how to best support those activities with educational technologies.
This activity types taxonomy for science introduces a range of student learning activities for teachers to consider when building lessons that strive to effectively integrate technology, pedagogy, and content.
This activity types taxonomy for mathematics introduces a range of student learning activities for teachers to consider when building lessons that strive to effectively integrate technology, pedagogy, and content.
The K-6 literacy learning activity types identified here attempt to simplify the complexity of teaching a child to read and write by subdividing these processes into manageable learning activities that effectively integrate technology, pedagogy and content.