I think even in terms of organization our course materials were very well organized in wetpaint wiki. Moussa, can you elaborate on this regarding your meaning for us so we can understand and comment? -Matt

I'm generally not very good at evaluating my own work. I'm very critical of myself and generally anticipate lower grades than what I get. However, based on what we are grading on I will say that I feel our group did a thorough job of researching the information and presenting it in a logical manner. I think are toughest point to overcome was to make sure it flowed and didn't sound like it was written by four different people. I do wish that the formatting had held true across platforms though, that does bug me a little bit. Otherwise my hat is off to my groupmates.

This is a good point. Sometimes it f2f classrooms it can be difficult to tell who did what, but online collaboration provides an electronic footprint that can solve this issue.

Important point. One administrators and school officials should be paying more attention to in this time when budgets are constantly being slashed.

Overall great information. Well organized and well researched and referenced. Would be interesting to see a Wordle of your paper to see what the focus looks like. Thank you for your work.

What are some examples of when one model might be used over another?

Good point. One of the strongest benefits of resources like Google Docs is allowing groups to edit each other's documents in real time.

Good Recommendations based on the research. It is really difficult to sift through all the material so having a starting point to work from is helpful.

Overall I thought the paper did a thorough job of addressing the topic. There was some formatting issues, but I believe we all ran into this using online collaboration. Also would have liked to have seen your Delicious resources. Otherwise nice job Group 6!