Skip to main content

Home/ Groups/ wlmac economics
Shahid Khan

Wealth gap exposes fresh labour challenge - The Globe and Mail - 0 views

  • The final 2006 census data will portray the richest 5 per cent of Canadians as dramatically accumulating more wealth, the incomes of most residents showing perhaps the greatest stagnancy in the developed world and the nation's poorest falling further and further behind.
  • The data to be released Thursday by Statistics Canada will show median incomes falling for immigrants and native-born 18-to-34-year-old males who compete directly for the same entry level jobs that are increasingly characterized as low-pay, unstable and short term.
  • “The balance of power between worker and employer has shifted dramatically in this last 25 years, and that has something to do with what workers can command,” economist Armine Yalnizyan said.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • The census numbers are expected to show that the rich are driving up shelter prices beyond reach of increasing numbers of people whose earnings are inert, a situation impacting heavily on immigrants arriving in major cities where the housing markets are already stressed.
  • “I don't know what the census findings will say about trends in shelter costs over the long term,” Ms. Yalnizyan said, “but we know from other studies that housing affordability is at its worst level since 1990. How much people's incomes are getting eaten up by shelter costs, I imagine it's accelerating quite dramatically.”
  • And while the history of Canada has rested on immigration's contribution to the economic and cultural strength of the country, the census data raise disturbing and moral questions about the impact of admitting more than 200,000 immigrants a year who are struggling – with steadily declining success – to find jobs commensurate with their knowledge and experience, good incomes and decent, affordable housing.
  • Said Ms. Yalnizyan: “Economists have been buried by reports from Statistics Canada and other institutions showing income inequality to be on the rise. So that isn't a surprise. But what the Statistics Canada analysis will do on May 1 is connect the dots between incomes and shelter costs. And that takes it beyond a moral imperative to act and says this situation may not be sustainable. “Accommodation is the biggest bite out of the basket, and it goes straight to the heart of how income inequality is not about poverty, it's about affordability.
  •  
    Income inequality
Shahid Khan

Increasing Income Inequality in Canada | Mostly Water - 0 views

  • Growing income gap a warning to leaders OECD report shows rift in Canada increasing at quick rate
  • It says the income gap between Canada's rich and poor is growing faster than in most other 30 developed nations in the world, and that our governments need to stop that trend.
  • The news is about as sober a warning as it gets. Canada is falling behind internationally. We used to be above the average when it came to income equality. Now we're below average. And there's really no good excuse for it.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • As a nation, we are richer than most. Ours is the ninth-largest economy on the planet. The last decade has been one of the strongest, most sustained periods of economic expansion in our history.
  • Canadian government interventions traditionally offset these trends, particularly in bad times. But in the past 10 to 15 years governments backed away from investing in public benefits that help the majority of Canadians and replaced them with tax cuts that most benefit the richest 10 per cent -- exacerbating income inequality in the country.
  • Back in the 1920s -- the last time we experienced such dramatic income polarization -- Henry Ford saw in his workers an obvious solution: If he paid his workers higher wages, he created more consumers for his automobiles -- and a healthy middle class
  • Compare that to the last 10 years, when governments and markets alike have focused on building up systems that reward the rich and ask everyone else to wait for the drops of prosperity to trickle down.
  • In the meantime, the rich got richer and drove up housing prices and the cost of living soared for the rest of us. Our paycheques didn't keep up.
  • Governments are being asked to bail out banks and investors. They can also be asked to keep purchasing power among the jobless, speed up investments in badly needed infrastructure projects and engage in counter-cyclical investments like housing to maintain jobs in the middle of the income spectrum.
  • Anything less means Canada will continue down the troubling path of continuously growing income inequality, instability and economic weakness. It's time to heed the warnings and change our course of action.
  •  
    Income inequality
Shahid Khan

Inequality -  Investing: Canadian Business magazine news and articles - Money... - 0 views

  • One of the oldest truisms of the capitalist economy is that the rich keep getting richer while the poor only get poorer, and a cursory look at the wealth tables would appear to bear this out.
  • There is no doubt that we live in an increasingly unequal society. Since the late 1970s, income inequality in the United States has steadily increased, to the point where the top quintile of Americans now own 84% of the country’s total wealth. The picture is similar in Canada, where the top 20% of households control 70% of the wealth.
  • In Canada, the situation is similar if slightly less compressed: the top 1% of the population possesses 14% of total wealth. As Laval economist Stephen Gordon wrote in a column for Canadian Business last July, “In recent decades, the rising economic tide has floated a small number of luxury yachts, leaving everyone else beached ashore.”
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • The bad news is that unchecked and runaway inequality, regardless of absolute income levels, and regardless of its causes, has unhealthy consequences that get worse as the chasm between rich and poor grows.
  • But this only raises the question of why there isn’t more public outrage. Why hasn’t the spike in inequality led to outright class warfare? There are two reasons: ignorance, and comfort.
  • In their 2009 book, The Spirit Level , British researchers Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett surveyed the large body of literature on the social determinants of health, and they concluded that societies with more a equal distribution of incomes have better health outcomes than ones in which the gap between richest and poorest parts of society is greater. Most interesting, the differences seem to have little to do with absolute levels of national income; instead, simply living in an unequal society is bad for your health, at almost all income levels.
  • Given all of this, how can rising levels of inequality be tolerated, or even considered a good thing? One argument that is frequently advanced in favour of inequality is that it serves as an incentive to achievement, and wide inequalities can be tolerated when social mobility is correspondingly high. On this view, the wealthy and successful serve as a sort of motivational lodestar, pointing the direction toward which all of us can strive. And in some countries, this argument holds. Australia, Canada, and the Scandinavian countries all have very high levels of social mobility, measured as the absence of a strong link between individual and parental earnings.
  • Facts and figures % of national wealth owned by top quintile, U.S.: 84% % of national wealth owned by top quintile, Canada: 70% % of national wealth owned by top 1%, U.S.: 35% % of national wealth owned by top 1%, Canada: 14%
  •  
    Income inequality
Shahid Khan

New study documents increasing income inequality in Canada - 0 views

  • A study released last March and titled “The rich and the rest of us—The changing face of Canada’s growing gap” reveals that Canadian society is becoming dramatically more unequal, with the gap between the earnings of the richest Canadians and the rest, both those considered middle-income and the poor, widening.
  • The CCPA study found that in 2004, the average earnings of the richest 10 percent of Canadian families raising children were 82 times greater than those earned by the poorest 10 percent.
  • In considering the report’s findings, it is important not to confuse annual income with wealth. The wealth gap between Canada’s rich and poor is as great, or even greater, than the income gap. According to a Statistics Canada study released late last year, 50 percent of Canadians in 2005 owned just 3.2 percent of the country’s wealth, while the richest 10 percent of Canadians owned 58.2 percent of the wealth.
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • The CCPA report demonstrates that the gap between the earned incomes of the wealthiest 10 percent of Canadian families and the poorest 10 percent has almost tripled in the three decades since 1976, the ratio rising from 31 to 1 in 1976 to 82 to 1 in 2004.
  • In the late 1970s the poorest 20 percent of all Canadian families earned 4.5 percent of total family earnings. By the first years of the 21st century their share had shrunk to just 2.6 percent.
  • The report demonstrates that while Canada’s economy has experienced significant growth over the past quarter century—real economic output almost doubled between 1981 and 2005—the poorer half of Canadian families “either earned less” in inflation-adjusted terms “or just the same as their predecessors almost 30 years ago.”
  • The average Canadian worker made just over $38,000 in 2005, a 15 percent increase over average earnings in 1998 of just over $33,000. But during the same period, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) rose 17.85 percent, meaning that, after adjusting for inflation, the average worker actually lost purchasing power.
  • Saez and Veall note that incomes trends in Canada are almost identical to those in the US: “Over the last 20 years, top income shares in Canada have increased dramatically, almost as much as in the United States. This change has largely remained unnoticed because it is concentrated within the top percentile of the Canadian income distribution and thus can be detected only with tax return data covering very high incomes.”
  • While the real wages of most Canadians have stagnated or even fallen in recent years, they are actually working longer hours.
  • They warn that growing social inequality threatens to produce social turbulence that will make Canadian capitalism unsustainable: “We ignore these trends at our collective peril.”
  • study found 76 percent of Canadians believe the gap between the rich and poor is growing and that 67 percent of the population do not believe that the majority is benefiting from the country’s economic growth.
  • Not for the vast majority of Canadians whose real incomes, as the CCPA has documented, have stagnated or fallen even as they work longer hours. But certainly for the Globe’s proprietors, the Thomson family. In 1998, the Thomson fortune was estimated at US$14.4 billion, a total that surpassed the collective wealth of the poorest third of all Canadian households. Today, Ken Thomson is said to be worth a staggering $US24.4 billion, making him, according to Forbes magazine, one of the 10 richest people in the world.
  •  
    Income inequality
Shahid Khan

Canada discovers trickle-up economics - thestar.com - 0 views

  • Over the last three decades, the tables of the rich have overflowed, with barely any scraps falling off. On the contrary, there’s been a massive transfer of income and wealth from Canada’s middle and lower class to the rich.
  • This is bad news, since a growing body of empirical evidence shows that extreme inequality has a clearly negative effect on a wide range of health, social and economic problems, as well as undermining democracy.
  • In the 1950s and 1960s, for instance, the real median family income in Canada was growing fast enough to double every 20 years. Since 1980, it has barely grown at all.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • As a recent study by economist Armine Yalnizyan of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives documents, the top-earning 1 per cent of Canadians almost doubled their share of national income, from 7.7 per cent to 13.8 per cent, over the past three decades.
  • The massive upward flow of income has largely been invisible to the public, even though it may well amount to the most significant change in Canadian society in decades.
  • The wealthy also often employ a form of blackmail, either directly or indirectly threatening they’ll leave the country if governments don’t capitulate to their demands for lower taxes. While it’s hard to imagine political leaders caving in to similar threats from other groups — say, electricians or teachers — the sheer economic power of the wealthy seems to quickly bring governments to heel.
  • It’s hard to find any justification for the fact that, while the average CEO was making about 25 times the average worker in the late 1970s, today’s average CEO makes roughly 250 times the average worker
  • A more likely explanation is that the rich have used their clout to get governments in the United States, Britain and Canada to change the rules, redirecting economic benefits to themselves
  • The rich also greatly enriched themselves by convincing governments to lower their taxes. Whereas the top marginal tax rate — the rate paid on income above a certain level — averaged 80 per cent in Canada in the early postwar years; it is now just 46 per cent (39 per cent in Alberta).
  • t was argued that lower taxes would encourage better performances at the top, increasing overall economic growth.
  • the introduction of an inheritance tax in Canada (like ones that exist in almost all advanced nations) would enable Ottawa to collect enough revenue to create educational trust funds for all Canadian children, thereby significantly improving national productivity.
  • Yet anyone advocating higher taxes on the rich is quickly denounced by groups like the right-wing Fraser Institute. Mark Milke, a commentator with the institute, dismisses concerns about rising inequality in Canada as merely the product of envy, or what he calls the “green-eyed beast.”
  • There was always skepticism about claims that, as t
Dmitri Tkachenko

National Bank is North Americas Strongest Bank: Bloomberg - 0 views

  •  
    "Canada has five banks in the top 20, with CIBC ranking 4th internationally behind National Bank. Canadian banks have "higher capital ratios than anyone else in the world," Canaccord Genuity analyst Mario Mendonca told Bloomberg. National Bank Pres. & CEO Louis Vachon told Bloomberg: "…size is not everything in financial services," and indeed it's not. National Bank's #1 North American ranking shows that prudent risk management and liquidity are meaningful and a source of confidence for investors and customers alike. Other ranking criteria included non-performing assets, loan-loss reserves, deposits-to-funding, and cost efficiency."
Han Kyul Lee

Crisis Pie Infographic - 55 views

Rating agencies, sub-prime mortgage lenders and investment banks are DEFINITELY the biggest titles at fault. The main reasons have already been covered; rating agencies failed to rate the toxic ass...

financial crisis economics crisis blame Financial caused what pie infographic

Sophia Wang

Definitions - 98 views

Alpha and Beta accutally have interesting meanings in business. Alpha 1. A measure of performance on a risk-adjusted basis. Alpha takes the volatility (price risk) of a mutual fund and compares it...

financial crisis definitions

Tina Lao

Ratings Agencies Struggle With Mortgage Bonds - NYTimes.com - 1 views

  • two-thirds of these mortgage bonds were rated only last year, long after the financial crisis.
  • played an enormous role in creating the conditions that led to the financial crisis.
  • Wall Street took bonds that had collapsed (and that the agencies had rated incorrectly the first time) and rebundled them. Generally, the top half was rated triple A, supposedly exceedingly safe.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • “Chances are that if a bond is getting re-remicked, it’s a bad bond and the holder wants to forestall the inevitable reckoning,” Mr. Kolchinsky said. The ratings agencies somehow missed that.
  • S.&P., according to Mr. Kolchinsky, was slower to downgrade residential mortgages than Moody’s was. Lo and behold, S.&P. nabbed the bigger market share in new offerings of residential securities.
  • Here’s the problem: Credit rating companies have long contended that their conclusions are protected by the First Amendment, much as if their ratings were as irrelevant to the markets as, say, your average financial column. Dodd-Frank tried to change that, designating the agencies as “experts,” like lawyers or accountants, when their ratings were included in Securities and Exchange Commission documents for certain kinds of offerings. That would make them liable for material errors and omissions in their ratings.
  •  
    Current situation with rating agencies.  Still vulnerable to problems that existed before the financial crisis.
Santiago Sanchez

Roubini Global Economics - Finance & Markets Monitor - 2 views

  • hedge funds act in concert to destabilize global economies.
  • a hedge fund is a limited investment partnership otherwise exempt from registering with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Sections 3C1 and 3C7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940.
  • If their objective was to profit from the current instability, they were remarkably unsuccessful. According to Hedge Fund Research, the average fund this year is down 17 percent.
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • that hedge funds are risktakers – gunslingers on a global scale. While it is true that the aggressive incentive fee structures (often 20 percent of any profits on top of a management fee of about 2 percent of assets under management) appear to encourage risk taking, career concerns are an offsetting factor.
  • some of the few remaining successful hedge fund managers such as Steven Cohen of SAC Capital Advisors, Israel Englander of Millenium Partners and John Paulson of Paulson & Co (who is scheduled to appear in the November 13 hearings) have taken their funds out of the market and are in cash investments
  • the typical hedge fund has a half life of five years or less and the fact that it is hard to restart a hedge fund career after a failure, managers can be quite risk averse
  • excessive risk taking took place in a context of poor operational controls, where trading limits were exceeded multiple times and ordinary risk management procedures were dysfunctional
  • some recent and spectacular hedge fund failures. The failure of Amaranth, a multi-strategy fund with more than $8 Billion assets under management, with more than 80 percent invested in a natural gas trading strategy, is often cited as an example of undiversified financial risk exposure.
  • there is no evidence that these funds maintained significant positions in the Asia currency basket over the time of the crisis
  • As to the question of illicit enrichment that Dr. Mahathir charges George Soros with, his funds did not increase in value, but actually lost five to ten percent return per month over the period of the crisis.
  • If there were any factual evidence at all to support a claim that Soros had intervened in the markets to bring down the Ringgit, it would have been produced by now. I should note that the silence is deafening. I suspect that what is really going on is that Soros was an expedient target of opportunity. The only remaining question is why, given the lack of evidence, Dr. Mahathir felt compelled to bring such serious charges against the hedge fund industry in general, and George Soros in particular.
  •  
    On October 2, the U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee announced a Hearing on Regulation of Hedge Funds scheduled for Thursday, November 13, 2008. The focus is on the causes and impacts of the financial crisis on Wall Street, and the Committee will hear from hedge fund managers who have earned over $1 Billion
Alexandra Huang

The Obama Speech We're Waiting For Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac need to get the BP treatment - 0 views

  •  
    Obama's view and plan towards Fannie and Freddie in the blame for the financial crisis.
Jonathan Li

Alan Greenspan fights back against critics - Feb. 5, 2010 - 0 views

  •  
    This is another good guy, caught in a bad situation. As it has done with many of his colleagues, the mainstream media has smeared Alan Greenspan as a scapegoat. To read about his life in greater detail is to understand this man and to see past the (to put it frankly) crap that the media often dishes out. 
Alexandra Huang

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac reform: Would it add $5 trillion to US debt? - 0 views

  •  
    Their not awaring of the bad situation really brought lots of troubles to the government...!
Paul Huynh

Countrywide Financial Corporation News - The New York Times - 0 views

    • Paul Huynh
       
      Has to repay
Jonathan Li

http://www.innlightmarketing.com/recessionary_marketing/pdf/List%20of%20US%20Recessions... - 1 views

  •  
    A list of recessions in the US economy from 1945 onward. It's a good reference if you want perspective on how this one related to its predecessors, and what factors make this one different.
Abdiwahab Ibrahim

Pension fund - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia - 0 views

  •  
    This is old, but yup.
Jonathan Li

The Economy: Who's to Blame? - Newsweek - 1 views

  •  
    A very damning article about executives of investment banks, traders and hedge fund managers, and the bonuses they received before the recession hit.
Abdiwahab Ibrahim

Intoxicated Institutional Investors: How The Financial Crisis Infected The Real Economy... - 1 views

  •  
    Blaming Institutional Investors.
Jeff He

The American Spectator : The True Origins of This Financial Crisis - 0 views

    • Jeff He
       
      Very nice article that shows the root of the cause of the financial crisis. It places the blame on everyone, but shows that poor lending policies/standards advocated by the government triggered everything.
  • Tax laws further amplified the problems of the housing bubble and diminished levels of home equity, especially the deductibility of interest on home equity loans.
  • The GSEs’ purchases of sub-prime and Alt-A loans affected the rest of the market for these mortgages in two ways. First, it increased the competition for these loans with private-label issuers.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • Second, the increased demand from the GSEs and the competition with private-label issuers drove up the value of sub-prime and Alt-A mortgages, reducing the risk premium that had previously suppressed originations. As a result, many more marginally qualified or unqualified applicants for mortgages were accepted.
  • Since these mortgages aggregate more than $2 trillion, this accounts for the weakness in bank assets that is the principal underlying cause of the current financial crisis.
  • state-based residential finance laws give homeowners two free options that contributed substantially to the financial crisis. First, any homeowner may, without penalty, refinance a mortgage whenever interest rates fall or home prices rise to a point where there is significant equity in the home, enabling them to extract any equity that had accumulated between the original financing transaction and any subsequent refinancing.
  • The homeowner’s opportunity to walk away from a home that is no longer more valuable than the mortgage it carries exacerbates the effect of the cash-out refinancing.
  • From 2005 to 2007, Fannie and Freddie bought approximately $1 trillion in sub-prime and Alt-A loans.
  • interest on home equity loans is deductible no matter how the funds are used. As a result, homeowners are encouraged to take out home equity loans to pay off their credit card or auto loans or to make the purchases that would ordinarily be made with other forms of debt.
  • Bank regulatory policies should also shoulder some of the blame for the financial crisis.
  • Bank assets are assigned to different risk categories, and the amount of capital that a bank holds for each asset is pegged to the asset’s perceived riskiness.
  • These rules provided an incentive for banks to hold mortgages in preference to commercial loans or to convert their portfolios of whole mortgages into an MBS portfolio rated AAA, because doing so would substantially reduce their capital requirements.
  • U.S. housing policies are the root cause of the current financial crisis. Other players--greedy investment bankers; incompetent rating agencies; irresponsible housing speculators; shortsighted homeowners; and predatory mortgage brokers, lenders, and borrowers--all played a part, but they were only following the economic incentives that government policy laid out for them.
  • our first order of business should be to correct the destructive housing policies of the U.S. government.
Alexandra Huang

Fair Game - Freddie, Fannie and the Third Rail of Housing Policy - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    recent news of fannie and freddie after the bailout
1 - 20 of 153 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page