I don't imagine any special consideration for CNAMEs within a current Diigo roadmap. It may eventually fall under an umbrella of 'things that site managers might request'.
Example: in rare circumstances, a site manager may wish for one name (of a site) to be broadly synonymous with another name - expressly for annotations such as Diigo.
* CNAMEs
I don't imagine any special consideration for CNAMEs within a current Diigo roadmap. It may eventually fall under an umbrella of 'things that site managers might request'.
Example: in rare circumstances, a site manager may wish for one name (of a site) to be broadly synonymous with another name - expressly for annotations such as Diigo.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DNS_record_types
I expect no response to this topic. Just thinking out loud :)
The current key principle is understood:
> Diigo's annotation / bookmarking is URL-specific.
> synonymous with another name - expressly for annotations such as Diigo.
Cross reference http://groups.diigo.com/Diigo_HQ/forum/topic/8974
Before too long, what's currently presented at
http://centrim.mis.brighton.ac.uk/
may be presented instead at
http://www.brighton.ac.uk/centrim/
Key point: visible content will be 100% identical.
(Apache is simply rewriting the URLs, and I hope for changes to the rewrite arrangements.)
In a case such as this it will be nice to have all Diigo users' annotations of the content preserved, reappearing after the change.
http://groups.diigo.com/group/Diigo_HQ/content/1217601 (January 2010) is
batch-change URL of previously highlighted sites?
To Top