Skip to main content

Home/ Writing & Learning/ Group items tagged stanford

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Bryan Kopp

Stanford Study of Writing - Research - Confidence in Writing - 0 views

  •  
    These students arrived at Stanford as fairly confident writers: most reported that coming out of high school they were "very confident." By spring of their first year, however, that confidence had slipped considerably, though by graduation and into their first year beyond Stanford their confidence levels were again fairly high;
Bryan Kopp

Stanford Study of Writing - Research - Visual and Multimedia Elements in Writing - 0 views

  •  
    Visual elements in writing increased gradually during their years at Stanford, as did the use of web pages, audio and video files, and presentational slides;
Bryan Kopp

Stanford Study of Writing - Research - Kinds of Writing - 0 views

  •  
    Students entered Stanford with a fairly wide range of writing abilities; During their first year, students reported being assigned to do eighteen different kinds of writing; this broad range of genre persisted through the four years, though the ratio differed from year to year;
Bryan Kopp

Stanford Study of Writing - Research - Amount of Writing - 0 views

  •  
    Students generally reported writing quite a bit in their first year (from 60 to more than 100 pages), then even more in their second and third year, then dropping off in the amount of writing in their fourth year;
Bryan Kopp

Stanford Study of Writing - Research - Paul Rogers - 0 views

  •  
    1. Participants who scored high in rhetorical awareness of audience in their freshman year showed their greatest amount of growth in subsequent years, indicating this variable as statistically significant (p>.0001). 2. Writing development is non-linear; students develop at different paces, sometimes regressing across years, particularly as they are learning the nuances of genre-specific writing within disciplines. 3. Participants reported that conversations about writing with teachers, professors, teaching assistants, and post-doctoral fellows had the greatest impact on their writing development. 4. While positive feedback appears to increase student-writers' confidence, descriptive constructive criticism may be most salient to helping students move their writing forward. 5. Students valued feedback at all stages of the writing process, but especially early on in the process when feedback clarified teacher expectations, and clearly connected to writing and revision processes.
Bryan Kopp

The Wired Campus - Can Twitter Turn Students Into Better Writers? - The Chronicle of Hi... - 0 views

  • A number of academics believe that writing on the Internet, in all its varied forms, can improve student prose. Mark Bauerlein is not one of them. The professor of English at Emory University noted in his Brainstorm blog post on Saturday that "we don't see any gains in reading comprehension for 17-year-olds on NAEP exams, the SAT, or the ACT," referring to the battery of standardized tests taken by teenagers. If Twittering, texting, and the like really improved writing, Mr. Bauerlein argues, surely the tests would show some evidence.
  •  
    Questioning the effects of Web 2.0 on the development of writing skills
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page