Skip to main content

Home/ WFSJuniorTOK/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by Rebecca Zug

Contents contributed and discussions participated by Rebecca Zug

Rebecca Zug

Research: Human friendships based on genetic similarities beyond the superficial - The ... - 0 views

  •  
    Social science/natural science on friendships. Also, what evidence is considered valid?
Rebecca Zug

Michael Pollan: How Smart Are Plants? : The New Yorker - 0 views

  •  
    Neurobiology; the intelligence of plants; controversies in the sciences
Rebecca Zug

Harvard art historian Jennifer Roberts teaches the value of immersive attention | Harva... - 0 views

  •  
    This article has much to do with sense perception and how to teach ourselves to truly observe.
Rebecca Zug

Brains flush toxic waste in sleep, including Alzheimer's-linked protein, study of mice ... - 0 views

  •  
    How the brain works during sleep
Rebecca Zug

Europe Aims to Regulate the Cloud - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    Regulating information on the cloud to prevent information sharing even at the cost of limiting business potential
Rebecca Zug

The Origins of Life | Harvard Magazine Sep-Oct 2013 - 0 views

  •  
    Example of interdisciplinary study
Rebecca Zug

Looking at Our Hometowns - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    High school students create a photo documentary of America.
Rebecca Zug

The Banality of Systemic Evil - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    ethics; young generation, Snowden
Rebecca Zug

How We Learn To See Faces - Phenomena: Only Human - 0 views

  • Two eyes, aligned horizontally, above a nose, above a mouth. These are the basic elements of a face, as your brain knows quite well. Within about 200 milliseconds of seeing a picture, the brain can decide whether it’s a face or some other object. It can detect subtle differences between faces, too — walking around at my family reunion, for example, many faces look similar, and yet I can easily distinguish Sue from Ann from Pam. Our fascination with faces exists, to some extent, on the day we’re born. Studies of newborn babies have shown that they prefer to look at face-like pictures. A 1999 study showed, for example, that babies prefer a crude drawing of a lightbulb “head” with squares for its eyes and nose compared with the same drawing with the nose above the eyes.
  • Two new studies tried to get at this brain biology with the help of a rare group of participants: children who were born with dense cataracts in their eyes, preventing them from receiving early visual input, and who then, years later, underwent corrective surgery. After recording the brain waves of these children with electro- encephalography (EEG), the researchers suggest that there is a “sensitive period” in brain development for face perception — a window of time during the first two months of life in which the brain requires visual input in order to fully acquire the skill. If the brain doesn’t get this input, it can still learn the crude aspects of face processing — identifying a face as a face, for example — but lacks the fine-tuning ability of distinguishing one face from another. These differences show up not only in the patients’ behaviors, but in their brain waves.
  • None of the patients, even those who were blind for years before having surgery, had any trouble distinguishing faces from houses. But the way their brains performed the task was different. Whereas healthy controls only elicited the N170 marker after seeing faces, the patients showed it after seeing any kind of visual stimuli. This makes sense given what we know about early brain development, Röder says. “We are born with a lot of connections in the brain, and these connections are pruned down to 50 percent of the original number,” she says. “This pruning makes a functionally specialized system. It requires input during a particular phase of life, and it seems not to have taken place in these patients.” What’s more, she says, these deficits seem to persist for a long time, maybe forever. “Some of the individuals we’ve studied have been seen for more than 20 years, and they didn’t show this face sensitive response.”
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • Rather than there being a use-it-or-lose-it sensitive period for complex face processing, it might just be that the patients’ brains never learned to rely on faces as the controls’ brains did, and so naturally they wound up with a different strategy for processing them later on. “It would still be very interesting if the N170 were to be affected by social importance of stimulus,” he says. “That would point to the importance of sociology, not just biology or physical experience.”*
1 - 18 of 18
Showing 20 items per page