One-to-One Computing by Prof. Jim Lengel, Boston University College of Communication (http://www.bu.edu/jlengel and http://www.lengel.net) Two weeks ago in this space we discussed the growing trend toward laptop computers for teachers and students. We considered the growing trend of high school and college students bringing their computers in to the classroom and lecture hall.
Just because a technology is available for students doesn't mean it has to be used all the time. Find out what the research says about the benefits of one-to-one computing, and read about educator concerns about the overuse of technology. Included: Ten Web sites offering research, concerns, and tips on one-to-one computing!
Two recent studies of schoolwide one-to-one computing initiatives--one in the
United States and one in Canada--suggest that using laptops in the classroom
can help improve students' writing skills and bolster overall academic success.
The studies come as an increasing number of states and school districts are
rolling out laptop programs of their own.
Majority of the articles reproduced here are digests produced through funding from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S.Department of Education. The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Education nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S.
We have understood for a long time that expert teachers are those who can bring together their deep knowledge of subject matter with profound understanding of what is good for learning. The combination has been described as Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) and is more than the simple addition of two parts.
Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) attempts to identify the nature of knowledge required by teachers for technology integration in their teaching, while addressing the complex, multifaceted and situated nature of teacher knowledge. At the heart of the TPACK framework, is the complex interplay of three primary forms of knowledge: Content (CK), Pedagogy (PK), and Technology (TK). See Figure above. As must be clear, the TPACK framework builds on Shulman's idea of Pedagogical Content Knowledge.
This website has links to the different state educational technology plans from the United States of America. It has the statewide long-range strategic educational technology plans for improving student academic achievement through the effective use of advanced technology in classrooms.
This is a PDF that describes different objectives and action plans. On page 2, you will find OBJECTIVE NUMBER 1.5: We will maintain an ongoing review of the instructional technology initiative.
ACTION PLAN 1: All schools will participate in an external audit of their classroom technology integration.
ACTION PLAN 2: Identify opportunities to improve equitable access to instructional technology.
ACTION PLAN 3: Identify the impact of technology exposure through the 1:1 initiative on student technology
aptitude.
ACTION PLAN 4: Document perception data of all stakeholders to inform instructional technology program
improvement activities.
ACTION PLAN 5: Conduct a cost effectiveness analysis that correlates contract specifics, cost, School Board
policy and practice. Identify opportunities for improvements that ensure optimal cost and management
effectiveness.
This is a great video that describes the needs of students as learners. It allows viewers to understand that the way students once learned may not work for students in the present moment.