y the most powerful nation in the world, made to bring about certain changes in the social and political order in southern Africa. To carry this out solemn pledges were broken, and lies were propagated, by men who are still described as upright and true by historians. And they did not stop at betraying trust. They turned the British army into Zulul
Contents contributed and discussions participated by ntlhari2001
12More
THE ARTICLE - 3 views
-
It is now one hundred years since the British invaded the Zulu kingdom and the Zulu, by the effectiveness of their resistance, brought their name so dramatically before the world.
-
They caused the death of perhaps ten thousand people and brought chaos and suffering to the lives of hundreds of thousands of others, starting a process of subjugation and oppression which is with us today.
- ...5 more annotations...
-
-
he Zulu kingdom was invaded to facilitate the advance of capitalist production in southern Africa; it is within this framework that we have to understand the individual motives and actions of the men who initiated the war.
-
or the majority of people who participated in the war, or were affected by it, the British invasion of Zululand in 1879 was not a glorious adventure, and the fact that it is still being portrayed as one is an indication of our failure to shake off the callous, racist myths of the imperial past.
-
-
3More
HISTORICAL IMAGE - 4 views
-
In this image we can see that the British people were able to defeat the ZULU people easily because they had horses and well established fighting equipment than the zulu people, they had guns and the ZULU people had only shields and spears, so this is why British people were able to destroy many properties in XULULAND during the ZULU WAR
-
12More
TAYLOR AND FRANCIS - 1 views
-
during the course of the next six months engaged Zulu units in a series of pitched battles and severe skirmishes
-
Those best equipped to provide information about the Zulu army and its conduct were the Zulu themselves
-
the fact that Zulu testimony does not derive directly from Zulu informants, and its uneĀ·ven quality should also be taken into account.
- ...4 more annotations...
-
while King Cetshwayo, though not present in person at any battle, was able to provide a unique survey of the Zulu strategy of the war based on his own orders and on the reports of his commanders. 10
-
-
14More
SECONDARY SOURCE - 1 views
-
s clear that the Zulu view of the war was very different from the English or European view, not so much as to detail but as to ment
-
From the Zulu point of view it seems that the War was not only somewhat insignificant, it was also somewhat irrational.
- ...6 more annotations...
-
be suddenly and unexpectedly attacked. It seems that the white people had in mind the bad deeds of Dingane, but Cetshwayo was a man of good character (umuntu olungile) who would never have committed acts like those of Dingane. He strongly criticised (sola) such acts and abhorred
-
-
-
-
Zulu and british people had diffrent understanding or view when it came to war. the war had affected the zulu people more ,entally than it had affected the british people. this point shows that the zulu people are the one who had sufferd more mentally during the zulu war because the zulu people are the ones who had envaded their kingdom and created a war.
-
1More
primary source - 6 views
-
War began in January 1879, when a force led by Lieutenant-General Lord Chelmsford invaded Zululand to enforce British demands and this is because king cetswhayo refused frere's demand for federation or to disband his ZULU ARMY because he was afraid of losing his power and this is what led to the ZULU WAR and the invention of ZULU LAND by THE BRITISH people