I think this is very interesting that even the color of a car can be associated with the accident rate of the taxi. The yellow color on the taxi make use of the pattern recognition in human mind as people tends to make connection between yellow and caution. I really like this idea because it shows that sometimes the fallacies in our logic can benefit us in the modern society. It is not totally useless. --Sissi (3/15/2017)

Emoji is becoming more and more popular in people's chatting and comments on social medias. People use emoji because they faster, more convenient, and funnier. And now people can even design their own emoji to have it suit for various conditions. But can emoji really replace the letters and language? I sometimes feel that emoji is so fast and cheap. It only take a click to sent an emoji and people usually sent without any further thoughts because it is so quick and easy. Although emoji is sometimes make the comments seem cuter and funnier, it makes people's comments less hearty. I think typing in some letters in the comments does oblige us to think about what we are saying before we sent it out. --Sissi (3/15/2017)

I have listened to a radio show. There was a guest speaker one time that he talks about meteorite. He said that cosmic dust is the smallest and most common meteorite. I think it is really amazing to think about because those mysterious meteorites that are sold high in the auction are actually al around us. There is one quote that I really like from this article: "The key is knowing what to look for". I think this is pretty true in our daily life. For example, when I was doing my IA chemistry lab, once I understand the mechanics behind the lab procedure, the whole process becomes more meaningful for me. It feels like that I switch to a different perspective after understanding the lab. --Sissi (3/14/2017)

This news shows that there are a lot of cases that companies use science as a shield to convince people that their product is safe and good. Honesty is scientific papers has always been an important issue when we talk about the reliability of those papers. As we discussed in TOK, science is more like a social project that involves a lot of people and all human works are more or less biased and subjective. Now, science is intertwined with benefit and economics so the issue become much more complicated. I think we should identify the sources of the paper before citing any word from the paper because who write the paper is a big factor of which side the paper is standing. --Sissi (3/14/2017)

I think this app is very interesting. There are obviously gender inequality in the society that men are often more used to take the leadership than women. I think by counting how many times a woman is interrupted by a man is a very interesting aspect to show how the society is still dominated by men. I also really like that the author discusses about other possible factors of why women are more likely to be interrupted by men. Only arguing about one side wouldn't make a strong argument. Gender inequality is a big and heavy label that we should give it more thinking before we apply it to any phenomenon. --Sissi (3/14/2017)

This new design reminds me of how the internet is limiting us in our comfort zone. Although in theory, there is almost infinite amount of information on the internet, we can only get a very small proportion of it. And people tends to read the information that support their idea or fit their interests. So the news servers start to design system that only provide readers with what they want to see or like to see. It does not do good to diversify people's mind as what internet should be doing. In the quote, Dan Wagner said: "you're a designer of reality", but I interpret this as we are the designer of our own reality. This will only isolate people from each other. Without living in the same reality, people won't have real communication, so I think this new design does have cons. --Sissi (3/14/2017)

I think it is very interesting than even those wearable designs can be related to neuroscience. They seem to me that the two subjects are very far away. Those designs are very interesting as it combine some idea in science with artistic designs. As we learned in English when we were having a speech project, power pose is a standing position that can strengthen our confidence and persuasiveness. By having those clothing specially designed, it can force us into such position. I think this is a very fantastic idea. I really like the changing height high heel. As a short person, I know how people feel when they have to raise their heads to talk to people. --Sissi (3/12/2017)

Although I agree with the author on his point that Internet does cut down our time spent in natural world and traditional socialization, I don't think this problem is serious or bad enough that Internet should be sensibly restricted in custom and in LAW. Internet is the product of the changing of the society. There is always losing coming with gain. I think what we gain from the Internet is greater than what we lose. We do need temperance for internet, but I think it's ones' personal right to decide whether to control himself or not. Internet is more life people's personal life style rather than something that need to be regulated. --Sissi (3/12/2017)

I think this is not that the editors in China are being unprofessional. It is just they are not used to the satire in America. The news style in different country is very different. It reminded me of an online course I took over the winter break about social media. The teacher in that course highlighted that the social media in western culture are not tightly controlled by the government so their language are more personal. The social media in China is tightly controlled by the government so the language it uses is usually very formal and serious. --Sissi (3/9/2017)

The author went depth into how people see happiness. It is very interesting to see that our happiness in life does not increase as our life quality. There are ,any other reasons why we don't feel as happy as we should. The author bring up a very interesting point that happiness is very blank and hard to define, but the pursuit of happiness is what feels real to us and important to us. I think we feel less happiness is because we become easier to get what we want. The process of pursuing the happiness is lightened. --Sissi (3/9/2017)

This is a very interesting cognitive bias. It shows that people are very self-center and easily offended. I think it can be explained by the logic of evolution because people need to have a strong feeling for what belongs to them, no matter it is an object or some kind of idea. However, when the thing becomes others', people tend to care less. That's why it is always really hard to convince others to listen to your idea. --Sissi (3/6/2017)

Company start to pay attention to the fake news on the social media. It reminded me of the government involvement in economics. Although internet should be a place free of speech, there are mounting amount of fake news and alternative facts now that the company need to regulate and make rules to restrict it. I think as long as there is human society, we need rule. In free markets, we also need government regulation to remain a balance. --Sissi (3/6/2017)

I think this is gender stereotyping. People tend to make the assumption that women are more limited than men because they appear so emotional and irrational. However, in brain science, there is no real difference between male and female. The logic fallacies and flaws in reasoning stay true for everybody, not a specific gender. We also tends to label things to simplify. However, there are always exceptions to labels, as we learned in science. Labeling may filter out some really good stuff just based on our imprecise impression. -Sissi (3/4/2017)

Overinterpretation is very tricky because we never know certain of what other people are trying to say. Especially when we are studying the words of people in the history. People are never consistent with themselves, and I think that's why life is so interesting. People love the coming of age stories because you never know where the character will go. The same with people in the history. They are not black or white. They are a mix. But our confirmation bias always make us unconsciously select the words from them that support our opinion. Although we always say we can learn from the history, what we actually are doing is just agreeing on stuff that we have already agreed with. This is not real learning. --Sissi (3/4/2017)

Sometimes, people are ashamed of their ambition. They are afraid to have a dream because they would not bear any failure. I think people don't dare to dream big now. I think it might be because of the concept of economics we have in the recent years. Most people follow the efficiency rule so nobody is willing to risk and make a revolution. Putting on big stake is not the most efficient choice in economics. Although it tells us it is okay to be greedy, but it limited us to the model and make us less willingly to make a breakthrough. --Sissi (3/2/2017)

This article reminded me of an article I read in my SAT reading section. Biomimicry is a very interesting subject because it learns from the nature. An example I have read about is the arrangement of the solar plants. Scientists arrange them like how seeds arranged in a sunflower to maximize the amount of solar energy absorbed. And now, scientists are using human technology to benefit nature. But somehow I think it is inefficient because if we have to spend money to make the environment we influenced to feel like natural, why don't we protect it and keep it natural at the first place? --Sissi (3/2/2017)

The freedom of press is one of the main principle of democracy. Although fake news and alternative facts are filled the social media, it is very irrational and inefficient to take out the press completely. Getting rid of the problem is not the right way to solve the problem, it is only escaping. I think the press now is indeed flawed, but the thing it really need is regulation and certain level of government involvement. I also think it is very ironic that the president is using twitter to declare the press "the enemy of the American people" because the internet is filled with more flawed information than the press. People have to think before they publish something on the press, but in Internet, people don't usually consider their responsibility to their words. --Sissi (3/1/2017)

As we learned in TOK, science is full of uncertainties. And in this article, the author suggests that even the publication of science paper is full of flaws. But the general population often cited science source that's in support of them. However, science findings are full of faults and the possibility is very high for the scientists to make a false claim. Sometimes, not the errors in experiments, but the fabrication of data lead to false scientific papers. And also, there are a lot of patterns behind the publication of false scientific papers.

People have been searching for more powerful and more efficient medicines. All sorts of weird ideas pop up as people try out different possibilities. Although people believe in science today, they are still willing to try out different things. Alternative medicine is where people like to spend their money on. When it comes to health, people are likely to be superstitious. Many people don't go to the doctors until the last minute. They tends to rely more on their own senses and perception when it comes to their life. I think it's because going to doctor is like trusting another person with your life, which is very hard for people. Seeking for alternative medicine give people a feeling that they can avoid the doctors. Like the medicine of eternity back in time, the alternative medicine today uses the same flaws in our reasoning. --Sissi (2/28/2017)

Corruption in government leads to Pareto inefficiency. I remember in a book about game theory, this is a malicious cycle in hiring government employees. For example, there are four people competing for the same position in government. One is lazy and stupid, One is hardworking but stupid. One is lazy but clever. The last one is hardworking and clever. The first one is obviously the first one to be eliminated. The leader of the government won't hire the last person because he is a potential threats to the leadership of the higher-up. The third one will often mess things up. So the only choice left for them is people who are lazy but clever. These people won't make any contribution to the government, but they occupy the money and regulation. This game theory behind hiring in government indirectly suggest the corruption in government is inevitable.