The difficulty of knowing other people’s intent is a classic philosophical problem. It is epistemological in that it involves the limits of our knowledge. We can’t really know what anyone else hopes to do, and sometimes, because of the subconscious and self-deception, we don’t ever know what our own true intent is. It is also an example of the problem of other minds. We can never really enter into the perspective of any other person nor can we ever really know what they think (or even if they think). We are discrete individuals and communication is unreliable.
My point: the political and economic realities of running from gun activists is, yet again, founded on classic philosophical issues, and when we take positions on issues of the day, we are really taking positions philosophically. The gun-rights activists think that their intent is obvious and that everyone knows what they hope to do. They believe their minds are transparent. But this is because they are all extreme narcissists. It baffles them that we don’t all know exactly what they are thinking. It shocks them that we don’t know that Jim is a good guy, and that Sally would never murder anyone. But they are wrong. We don’t know them and we don’t know how they think. The only thing that makes us notice them at all is that they have guns and truthfully, that’s why they carry them in the first place. They want to be celebrities, heroes, and the centers of attention.
1More
1More
Guns are now killing as many people as cars in the U.S. - The Washington Post - 0 views
1More
Current Affairs | Culture & Politics - 0 views
1More
A Mass Shooting in Texas and False Arguments Against Gun Control | The New Yorker - 1 views
4More
What Do You Say to a Roanoke Truther? - The Daily Beast - 0 views
2More
Corrupting the Chinese Language - NYTimes.com - 0 views
5More
How a Gay-Marriage Study Went Wrong - The New Yorker - 1 views
1 - 13 of 13
Showing 20▼ items per page