In April and May of 2013, Yale Law professor Dan Kahan — working with coauthors Ellen Peters, Erica Cantrell Dawson, and Paul Slovic — set out to test a question that continuously puzzles scientists: why isn’t good evidence more effective in resolving political debates? For instance, why doesn’t the mounting proof that climate change is a real threat persuade more skeptics?
1More
1More
Danish Radio Station Defends Host Who Clubbed Rabbit to Death During Animal Welfare Deb... - 0 views
1More
Pulchrinomics: Handsome C.E.O.s, Handsome Returns : The New Yorker - 0 views
2More
Ceres, Pluto, and the War Over Dwarf Planets - The New Yorker - 1 views
The 6 fundamental debates of ToK. | ToK Trump - 0 views
1More
Debate Persists Over Diagnosing Mental Health Disorders, Long After 'Sybil' - NYTimes.com - 0 views
1More