I felt that team A was not as knowledgeable about their subject compared to team B. I used this list of categories to rate their performances:
Professionalism/Professional Speaking: 8/10 Knowledgeability: 6/10 because they read every slide and didn't add anything that wasn't scripted on the screen Research/Citations: 8/10 because there were many citations, but they were almost too small to read Slide Quality: 8/10 because it was prepared with a generic Prezi guide Verbatim Reading of Slides: 1/10 because they READ EVERY WORD ON THE SCREEN Unique Aspect to the presentation: 3/10 because there was no personal touch to the presentation, but it was neat and orderly Overall Score: 35/60
I felt the only convincing part of their presentation was the bit about Afghanistan using texting to teach girls to read. That, to me at this point, seems to be the only bit of info that can be proved or disproved with research.
I agree with you Janelle. I do feel that Team A fell short of Team B. Although they did have some great information, like you said they were very stuck to their slides and did not really research deeper into their subject which I oticed when asking my questions.
Professionalism/Professional Speaking: 8/10
Knowledgeability: 6/10 because they read every slide and didn't add anything that wasn't scripted on the screen
Research/Citations: 8/10 because there were many citations, but they were almost too small to read
Slide Quality: 8/10 because it was prepared with a generic Prezi guide
Verbatim Reading of Slides: 1/10 because they READ EVERY WORD ON THE SCREEN
Unique Aspect to the presentation: 3/10 because there was no personal touch to the presentation, but it was neat and orderly
Overall Score: 35/60
I felt the only convincing part of their presentation was the bit about Afghanistan using texting to teach girls to read. That, to me at this point, seems to be the only bit of info that can be proved or disproved with research.
To Top