Skip to main content

Home/ Technologies and the Future of Writing Spring 2008/ Group items tagged model

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Jemone Paul

Global Corona Virus Test Kits Market Dynamics, Drivers, Restraints and Opportunity 2020... - 0 views

www.mccourier.com/ints-and-opportunity-2020-2026

Global Corona Virus Test Kits 2020 2026 forecast stydy tools resources Technology Science Google marketing social media internet education NEWS blog size shares Price Demand Trends Revenue industry growth opportunities market research syndicatemarketresea

shared by Jemone Paul on 30 Nov 20 - No Cached
  • Jemone Paul on 30 Nov 20
     
    Syndicate Market Research's Latest Report 'Global Corona Virus Test Kits Market 2020' Analyses Research Methodology overview including Primary Research, Secondary Research, Company Share Analysis, Model ( including Demographic data, Macro-economic indicators, and Industry indicators: Expenditure, infrastructure, sector growth, and facilities ), Research Limitations and Revenue Based Modeling. Company share analysis is used to derive the size of the global market. As well as a study of revenues of companies for the last three to five years also provides the base for forecasting the market size (2020- 2026 ) and its growth rate. Key Competitors included are Qiagen (Germany), Roche (Switzerland), Seegene (South Korea), Solgent (South Korea), Curetis (Germany), Kurabo (Japan), Mologic (UK), Thermo Fischer (UK), MD Solutions, Mylab, Pishtaz Teb Zaman Diagnostics, Abbott, BioMednomics, Getein Biotech, GenMark Diagnostics
vanamb16

The CW Television Network, CWTV.com - Home of Gossip Girl, America's Next Top Model, On... - 0 views

www.cwtv.com

america's girl gossip hill model next one top tree

shared by vanamb16 on 27 Mar 08 - Cached
  • vanamb16 on 27 Mar 08
     
    Save Bookmark
Gail Ramsey

Wired 14.12: YouTube vs. Boob Tube - 0 views

www.wired.com/...youtube.html

shared by Gail Ramsey on 13 Feb 08 - Cached
  • As for Sacerdoti's so-called postroll ads, even the most self-satisfied marketer wants to know who in the world would stick around to watch – or, more to the point, who can prove that anyone did.
    • dracmere
      dracmere on 13 Feb 08
       
      This brings up a good point. I do not know of many people that would stick around for a commercial after the video. I usually am ready to click on the next video after the one I am watching is done.
  • Wait until their commercials make it onto YouTube and hope they go viral.
    • dracmere
      dracmere on 13 Feb 08
       
      This option seems to work. I have seen many Superbowl ads make it onto Youtube, which probably allows more people to see them then the Superbowl did.
    • goulds28 gould
      goulds28 gould on 14 Feb 08
       
      Because many people watch the Superbowl only to see the commericals uploading them onto youtube would increase even more the use of the internet instead of television cable.
    • kimmerzx0 C
      kimmerzx0 C on 12 Mar 08
       
      If the commerical is effective enough to capture its audience, then it should no doubt appear on youtube so that people can see it again and again.
    • anonymous
      anonymous on 17 Apr 08
       
      I think this is a good option.
    • coffma46
      coffma46 on 14 Feb 08
       
      When I am watching a video...I don't care for the advertisement even if it relates to the video I am looking at. I usually just want to watch what I have to and then close it out.
  • ...33 more annotations...
  • As for Sacerdoti's so-called postroll ads, even the most self-satisfied marketer > wants to know who in the world would stick around to watch – or, more to the > point, who can prove that anyone did. >
  • "They've got the audience,
    • sunflower123
      sunflower123 on 14 Feb 08
       
      An the audience today is mostly a younger crowd that is geared more towards technology and watching veidos on computers, what a difference in only five years.
  • YouTube actually encourages this – so long as the free posts are accompanied by paid versions.
    • sunflower123
      sunflower123 on 14 Feb 08
       
      I like the idea that U-tube is welcoming to let others use their site to post commericals
  • A lot of those upload monkeys have a nasty habit of posting clips from TV shows or enhancing their clips by adding music tracks – which, of course, are somebody else's property.
    • willis02
      willis02 on 15 Feb 08
       
      I just finished reading the article assigned next week about plaigerism. It is true that many individuals think that just because it is on the internet and free access does not mean it is free to use. There are a lot of consequences that come along with stealing other peoples work.
    • vanamb16
      vanamb16 on 13 Mar 08
       
      wouldn't the artists be getting more publicity if people put their music/videos online? it's free exposure....
    • coffma46
      coffma46 on 15 Feb 08
       
      Even though these things (music and photos) arent of the person's creation it is something the person admires and they just want to promote it on his/her page.
  • YouTube refused to sell ads appended to either end of a video
    • willis02
      willis02 on 15 Feb 08
       
      I think a lot people come on youtube to watch highlights of their favorite show and not be distrubed by commercials. Everywhere we go we seem to see ads and this is the one place you wouldnt get any annoying breaks or pop ups. I think it would be stupid to start.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 13 Mar 08
       
      I agree, I think that youtube participation would downfall greatly if commercials were added to the videos.
  • #2 "They've got the audience
    • Elizabeth Somer
      Elizabeth Somer on 12 Mar 08
       
      Though younger crowds are generally geared towards new media, I think older crowds are catching on and are becoming crazed by it as well.
    • kimmerzx0 C
      kimmerzx0 C on 12 Mar 08
       
      As it said in our article about Facebook, the average age of the fastest growing users is over 35 years old.
    • vanamb16
      vanamb16 on 13 Mar 08
       
      they have such a broad audience...my dad is hooked and it seems as though everyday my mom is showing me a funny video that her sister sent her...my brother watches tv shows and my cousin posts videos. it is universal
  • So what about "Evolution of Dance," for instance? To put together this medley, did Laipply license 30 songs?
    • Elizabeth Somer
      Elizabeth Somer on 12 Mar 08
       
      The guy that created "Evolution of Dance" came to Rowan and spoke to us about this. He did have to receive copy right license I believe. The law is the law. The internet is not a "free for all"
    • needle10
      needle10 on 13 Apr 08
       
      What if someone else videotapped his performance and posted it on youtube, could he get in trouble for that if he didn't get permission to use those songs?
  • "I think its the beginning of the end of youtube as we know it," wrote a poster named SamHill24. Another, Link420, declared simply, "ITS OVER!!!! youtube is screwed."
    • zimmer67
      zimmer67 on 13 Mar 08
       
      This was interesting because as we have seen in the history of new technologies there are always many who are just not comfortable with change. As the past has shown, opposition does not always indicate whether something will succeed
    • anonymous
      anonymous on 17 Apr 08
       
      Even if YouTube is "screwed" there will be a replacement instantly.
  • In short, what if there were a missing link between the old model and the glittering new one? What would happen then?
    • butler09
      butler09 on 13 Mar 08
       
      I want to ask if this is even possible, but then again, look at where we are. Technology is never-ending, and there's no doubt that there will someday be a breakthrough. The question is only when.
  • AS SOMEBODY ONCE SAID, 100 million people can't be wrong. They can, however, be useless. It turns out that success is 1 percent inspiration, 99 percent monetization.
    • butler09
      butler09 on 13 Mar 08
       
      Media reflects the desires and whims of the audience. YouTube already has this, but when there's a sharing attitude prevalent that doesn't restrict the everyday, ordinary Joe Shmoe from posting, it's hard to come up with profitable ideas. No one wants to see commercials; that's why internet clips are so popular! People post what they want to see how they want to see it--and they don't stick in a 30-second add for cookies with it!
    • Jessica Bloom
      Jessica Bloom on 16 Apr 08
       
      This statement kind of made me laugh. It is totally true. I guess if so many people are using Youtube, it obviously can not be wrong. Also, I think how they are called useless is funny. As long as people are enjoying the videos, then who cares if they are useless? In their own minds they are successfull and that's all that matters!
  • #11 A lot of those upload monkeys have a nasty habit of posting clips from TV shows or enhancing their clips by adding music tracks – which, of course, are somebody else's property.
    • butler09
      butler09 on 13 Mar 08
       
      This is a major problem. There is a code of ethics that needs to be followed, but a lot of people don't care about that. Maybe some don't realize what they're doing, but still, it's illegal. We inherently accept that lying is wrong, that stealing is wrong, that plagerism is wrong. What's the difference between that and breaking copyright laws? Is that some sort of "golden opportunity" that people can ignore? No! But maybe they just figure they won't get caught. Few others appear to.
    • haines64
      haines64 on 25 Mar 08
       
      I'm suprised YouTube users (and people in general) aren't against this. For that matter, maybe I should phrase it as more people not publically being against this. It seems very sneaky to me to encourage this behavior, especially considering the ethical implications.
  • YouTube refused to sell ads appended to either end of a video
    • richar19
      richar19 on 13 Mar 08
       
      I would think it would be smart of them to sell ads. A lot of people view things on youtube every day and they could make a lot of money
  • As for Sacerdoti's so-called postroll ads, even the most self-satisfied marketer wants to know who in the world would stick around to watch
    • daydreamr97
      daydreamr97 on 19 Mar 08
       
      It's true, most people probably won't watch ads after the vdeo. I can't speak for anyone else, but I usually wont even watch the credits. Maybe if video makers did what filmmakers do now, have a bonus scene after the credits. You would see a video, the credits, a short ad, and final a bonus scene. A lot of people still wouldn't watch, but it's a possibility.
  • Which may suit the users just fine. One of the biggest obstacles to advertising success is the damage that success could inflict on the YouTube experience, till now an oasis of relative noncommercialism in a world of brand inundation
    • daydreamr97
      daydreamr97 on 19 Mar 08
       
      It's a good point. A lot of YouTube videos make use of copyrighted material, and although they credit the original creators, users seem paranoid about what the companies will do to them. By opening the site up to advertisers, it becomes even more likely that the big companies will start censoring what users can post.
  • But speculation abounds that copyright holders have just been waiting for someone with deep pockets, such as Google, to acquire YouTube, whereupon the lawsuits will fly.
    • daydreamr97
      daydreamr97 on 19 Mar 08
       
      This is exactly the fear of users. They use songs and video clips, and even though they aren't making money for their videos and most of the users do credit the original artists, they know that big companies can come along and tear their work down. Which isn't fair, when you think about it. All art is influenced by other art. In previous generations, it was okay for kids who became artists to begin by tracing and kids who became writers to begin copying other writers' styles, and kids who became directors to use action figures and a script drawn from other scripts. It's how people grow and discover who they are and what they want to say.
  • one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues
  • Photobucket,
  • "we are at the very, very beginning of online video."
    • haines64
      haines64 on 13 Apr 08
       
      Yet Zuckerberg was at the beginning of the social networking when he started Facebook and now look at what has come from it. If anything, it is likely that YouTube had a more direct startup (its target audience was not initially as limited as Zuckerberg's). Despite being at the beginning of online video, YouTube is becoming a social norm.
  • fatally intrusive
    • haines64
      haines64 on 13 Apr 08
       
      One of the things I find most annoying with TV shows online is the pseudo-commercials they include while loading and throughout the programs. If YouTube started using pre-video commercials, I personally would probably use the site less.
    • Gail Ramsey
      Gail Ramsey on 17 Apr 08
       
      If they have to run an ad, I think it should be done at the end or at least have the option to skip it. I think having it at the beginning sometimes hurts things in the end because people are impatient and they may just skip to another video or site else that does not have the ad first.
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      This is rather true. Sure, Google is a billion dollar company now, but what will happen five years from now? We live in a world where everything is constanly changing. Technologies are being upgraded and replaced. New companies are putting old ones out of business in a matter of months. No one can predicat anything in the digital revolution.
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      This is rather true. Sure, Google is a billion dollar company now, but what will happen five years from now? We live in a world where everything is constanly changing. Technologies are being upgraded and replaced. New companies are putting old ones out of business in a matter of months. No one can predicat anything in the digital revolution.
  • But even 100 million daily streams and $1.65 billion into the evolution of this species, how it will actually thrive is a mystery. "If anybody tries to answer that question
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      This is rather true. Sure, Google is a billion dollar company now, but what will happen five years from now? We live in a world where everything is constanly changing. Technologies are being upgraded and replaced. New companies are putting old ones out of business in a matter of months. No one can predicat anything in the digital revolution.
  • It, too, was a peer-to-peer revolutionary – one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues .
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      I have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
  • . It, too, was a peer-to-peer revolutionary – one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues .
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
  • It, too, was a peer-to-peer revolutionary – one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues .
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      I have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
  • It, too, was a peer-to-peer revolutionary – one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues .
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      I have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
  • It, too, was a peer-to-peer revolutionary – one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues .
    • mccrar25
      mccrar25 on 13 Apr 08
       
      I have never thought about this before. This YouTube revolution is very similar to the Napster craze. People who use YouTube post television shows, music videos, songs, and commercials for anyone to access. This really isn't much different from the concept of Napster's music sharing. In fact, YouTube can probably bring up more infringement issues, because it crosses over a wider range of genres.
  • The second big issue is the nightmare of protecting intellectual property. As eager as Madison Avenue is to push stacks of chips online, in the back of its mind is Napster. It, too, was a peer-to-peer revolutionary – one killed aborning by copyright infringement issues . Nobody wants to invest only to see the fledgling industry paralyzed with litigation, regulation, or legislation. And it is not an idle fear.
    • anonymous
      anonymous on 14 Apr 08
       
      I think that protecting intellectuall property is important, very imporatnt.I feel in a way that youtube is like limewire because you get to go on there and look up msuic for free; in the porcess, msuicians and artist alike aren't paid and the rights to their music are completely dimissed.
  • Actually, that's an easy one: Procter & Gamble would be ecstatic
    • anita sipala
      anita sipala on 17 Apr 08
       
      Procter&Gamble is probably the biggest distributor of products, from household products to prescription drugs. This fact makes it a highly advertised company. I guess this would make them very ecstatic.
    • Bianca Pieloch
      Bianca Pieloch on 17 Apr 08
       
      Putting a commercial in the beginning of the video may discourage the viewer from watching it. Is there some way the commercial can come in the middle? Or is that technically impossible? Maybe force the viewer to watch it?
    • Melissa Foster
      Melissa Foster on 17 Apr 08
       
      The idea of intellectual property and copyrighting is something that we discussed in our other two modules, so I found it intriguing that it continues to be such a sticky area. Also, the concept behind lawsuits being driven by the amount of money the company running the site has shows how it may all just be about wealth.
Jen Fitzgerald

Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business - 0 views

www.wired.com/...ff_free

shared by Jen Fitzgerald on 26 Mar 08 - Cached
  • he was creating demand for disposable blades.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 26 Mar 08
       
      this makes sense. i always find myself questioning which would last longer, disposable razors or replacable. his idea was smart.
  • the original "free lunch" was a gratis meal for anyone who ordered at least one beer
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 26 Mar 08
       
      how annoying are offers like that. i wanted the victoria's secret promotional giftbag and my mom had to buy $30 of merchandise to get it. it's very frustrating!
  • Thanks to Gillette, the idea that you can make money by giving something away is no longer radical.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • The Web has become the land of the free.
  • He sold razors in bulk to banks so they could give them away with new deposits ("shave and save" campaigns).
  • Milton Friedman himself reminded us time and time again that "there's no such thing as a free lunch. "But Friedman was wrong in two ways. First, a free lunch doesn't necessarily mean the food is being given away or that you'll pay for it later — it could just mean someone else is picking up the tab. Second, in the digital realm, as we've seen, the main feedstocks of the information economy — storage, processing power, and bandwidth — are getting cheaper by the day. Two of the main scarcity functions of traditional economics — the marginal costs of manufacturing and distribution — are rushing headlong to zip. It's as if the restaurant suddenly didn't have to pay any food or labor costs for that lunch. Surely economics has something to say about that?
  • Chris Anderson (canderson@wired.com) is the editor in chief of Wired and author of The Long Tail. His next book, FREE, will be published in 2009 by Hyperion.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 26 Mar 08
       
      i thought that was funny!
  • Virtually everything Google does is free to consumers, from Gmail to Picasa to GOOG-411.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 26 Mar 08
       
      i agree, i use google several times a day and i know friends who depend on it!
  • But tell that to the poor CIO who just shelled out six figures to buy another rack of servers. Technology sure doesn't feel free when you're buying it by the gross. Yet if you look at it from the other side of the fat pipe, the economics change. That expensive bank of hard drives (fixed costs) can serve tens of thousands of users (marginal costs). The Web is all about scale, finding ways to attract the most users for centralized resources, spreading those costs over larger and larger audiences as the technology gets more and more capable. It's not about the cost of the equipment in the racks at the data center; it's about what that equipment can do. And every year, like some sort of magic clockwork, it does more and more for less and less, bringing the marginal costs of technology in the units that we individuals consume closer to zero.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 29 Mar 08
       
      I agree...no matter how many times i re-read this, i fail to comprehend what is going on.
  • From the consumer's perspective, though, there is a huge difference between cheap and free. Give a product away and it can go viral. Charge a single cent for it and you're in an entirely different business, one of clawing and scratching for every customer. The psychology of "free" is powerful indeed, as any marketer will tell you.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 29 Mar 08
       
      nothing may be free, but they do a great job of convincing us it is. by having us believe and buy into their ploys they make more money and their bussiness grows.
  • this business model is now the foundation of entire industries: Give away the cell phone, sell the monthly plan; make the videogame console cheap and sell expensive games; install fancy coffeemakers in offices at no charge so you can sell managers expensive coffee sachets.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 29 Mar 08
       
      i can completely relate to that! consumers are willing to pay whatever they have to so they could have state of the art merchandise, when it required a fraction of the cost to produce it!
  • Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business
  • As much as we complain about how expensive things are getting, we're surrounded by forces that are making them cheaper.
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 29 Mar 08
       
      i found that ironically valid as well!
  • What does this mean for the notion of free?
    • kaeanne
      kaeanne on 29 Mar 08
       
      the notion of free is different to everyone. however everyone shares the same "i want it, and i want it now" attitude. having it for free is icing on the cake
  • kaeanne on 26 Mar 08
     
    Save Bookmark
  • Jen Fitzgerald on 27 Mar 08
     
    This is an article we read in class about the price of web services and the how business is changing
kristen peraset

UGG Classic, Classic Tall Boots, Classic Sheepskin Boots - Complimentary domestic groun... - 0 views

www.uggaustralia.com/ProductDetails.aspx

shared by kristen peraset on 16 Apr 08 - Cached
  • craftsmanship is evident in the Classic Tall's reinforced heel and raw seams. Wrapped in a taller upper for supreme comfort, it can be worn folded down for a different look and accent.
    • kristen peraset
      kristen peraset on 16 Apr 08
       
      .......
Jennifer Dougherty

Pediatricians promote literacy - Nightly News with Brian Williams- msnbc.com - 0 views

www.msnbc.msn.com/17580491

improving income literacy low peditrician reading

shared by Jennifer Dougherty on 22 Apr 08 - Cached
  • Jennifer Dougherty on 22 Apr 08
     
    This article is about a peditrician who started giving books to his patients with each well visit. He modeled to the parents how to read with their children. Over a nearly twenty year span, it has been discovered that overall literacy has improved.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20▼ items per page