Skip to main content

Home/ TEMS520/ Journal #2 Words Made Flesh: Fusing Imagery and Language in a Polymorphic Literacy
Anthony Stewart

Journal #2 Words Made Flesh: Fusing Imagery and Language in a Polymorphic Literacy - 5 views

TEMS520 reading literacy

started by Anthony Stewart on 13 Feb 12
  • Anthony Stewart
     
    Fleckstein, K.S. (2004). Words Made Flesh: Fusing Imagery and Language in a Polymorphic Literacy, College English, 66, pp.612-631
  • Anthony Stewart
     
    This article was a very interesting read and it highlighted some of the weaknesses of our "language-centric" approach to education. The author, Kristie Fleckstein, advocates for a "polymorphic" approach to literacy which relies on the use of mental (including imagination and kinesthetic awareness of place), graphic, and verbal imagery in our instruction and student compositions. The author offers that the use of analogical or imagistic thinking allows students to make connections that transfer what information they know into situations that are new and require learning. Due to a historical bias, written language has dominated academia in Western Civilization. For this reason the author contends that students deal with a variety of image based constructs that we seldom utilize to promote literacy. This in turn makes students feel displaced and discouraged. The author believes that by promoting multi-literacies or polymorphic literacy in our methodology, we can increase the effectiveness and depth of literacy in our students.

    In our modern "image-dominated" world it is increasingly important that we diversify our approach to literacy. Students are taking in information in a variety of contexts and environments. Using some of the ideas that Fleckstein describes seems like a great way to help our students become better readers and writers, by allowing them to conceptualize their understanding in a variety of ways. In directing a reading comprehension group last year, I was given a several strategies to work with that included "making connections" or "using imagery". These strategies are useful, and I think they will work even better given a classroom environment and pedagogy that embraces polymorphic literacy. The author quotes a resource at one point that suggests we change the current terminology of "writing across curriculum" to "composing across curriculum", where "composing could include the production and interpretation of images as well as words"

    As a future visual arts teacher, I am very interested in the use of imagery in promoting student literacy. This article helped me place some ideas for instruction in a context that allows me to realize where some of the strategies I have used in the past came from. The use of situational contexts has always dominated how I instruct students. The use of cathartic actions (acting it out) and employing empathy (put yourself in this position) in understanding has always helped me to better reach students. I am very interested in the use of what the author calls "design portfolios". These portfolios help to orientate students with the school setting in a way that activates the use of visual and linguistic representation. These places could be from home life, from a story they read, or from a different class in school. When students present the various environments that they encounter in a "polymorphic journal" it allows them to represent themselves in various contexts, and develops their sense of belonging. This practice seems like it would enrich learning by helping students to envision multiple perspectives. This could also help students experiencing cultural and social disparities between school and home to find their center.

    Overall I think that promoting this type of literacy is important, but I would like to see if it would lend itself to greater language based literacy. I know that using film or poetry can allow students to have a point of access that reading doesn't always produce. Some students would rather present a Powerpoint than write an essay. I understand that this is important for learning, because it allows the students to experience success. The end result should aim to increase language literacy. I know that being able to write poetry for extra credit or creating art as part of a presentation were two ways I first became interested in educating myself. I didn't realize it then, but that "point-of-access" meant everything. When I found out that I could go to college for art, all the rest of the learning I did became less difficult, because I had "my literacy". My thoughts and ideas suddenly mattered. I obtained brief glimpses of this in high school, but if I hadn't had a chance to take a few art classes to "get my feet wet" in college, I never would have pursued higher education. I can't really explain how this led to me becoming a better writer. I know writing poetry helped, but I am really interested in how self-efficacy and having a community (other art students) contributed to my success. I do know my ability to imagine and understand analogies always made me a better reader. This article may not provide a lot of concrete strategies, but it has definitely given me some things to think about.
  • Linda Clinton
     
    Another fascinating article. I appreciate how you share your thinking about your own literacy experiences, and what you hope to bring to students.

To Top

Start a New Topic » « Back to the TEMS520 group