Critical thinking skills are among the most important and most difficult skills to develop for student success. Here's an example of how Web 2.0, VLE and PBL come together in a singularity. How could this use of technology benefit your students?

I agree that access for grade school students can be limited and probably should be limited. But consider the possibilities if we use this technology in the classroom in collaborative efforts where we connect with other classes studying the same information. What might happen if we were able to connect students from one classroom with students in another classroom in different part of the country or even another country? We could potentially create VLE experiences where the access was limited to those participating in the learning experience and incorporate problem based learning across the internet. What would a class like that look like? What could we expect for outcomes? Is it possible that we might be surprised by the results?

Interesting that an article about Web 2.0 Technologies that suggests that copyrights might be going the way of the dinosaur will not allow you to capture or highlight using a tool like Diigo.

The social media site doesn't "own" the content, what you are agreeing to is a license for them to use the content. The ownership stays with the creator. I find the contention by some that copyrights are no longer a valid way to handle content to be more troubling than Facebook or Twitter's licensing agreement. Just stay away from posting things to Twitter and Facebook or other social media site that you don't want other to have control over and your problem is solved. However, if we give in to the idea that copyright laws are outdated and that since it no longer is cost prohibitive to produce content we should just give up copyrights then we have a new and different issue. What happens to print, music, art, video and other media once it has been produced without copyright laws? Is there a better way to define copyrights that would be more in line with how content is shared and distributed today? Should we just bring an end to copyrights? Should we go the other way and try to rigidly enforce copyright law? Is that even possible in the social media world we live in?

Olivia and Ibanuelos make good points here even though they are on opposite sides. How do we protect those that do not want their songs uploaded on YouTube? Clearly as Olivia concedes there must be at least a "few artists" that don't want their music uploaded. It seems that most are probably happy with the licensing arrangement that YouTube has in place. The question remains though is copyrighting an archaic system that has not kept up with the innovations of technology? It is clearly very easy to get around a copyright and use the material in almost any way you choose with little or no consequences in the vast majority of cases. Would removing copyright restrictions on content produced using Web 2.0 Technology foster creativity?