In 1962, 77% of a Gallop Poll respondents said they had watched
television the day before; in 1988, 91% admitted doing so. Nowadays
"an average American spends at least three hours a day in
front of a television set" (Glenn 223). Considering the impact
of television on reading only in terms of time, conventional wisdom
has it that television has a detrimental influence on the development
of a person's literacy level simply because that people have allocated
less time on reading. Thus it is not surprising for the general
public to have the notion that Americans' reading habits are on
the decline. Such view is reinforced by the popularity of such
books as Jonathan Kozol's Illiterate America, in which Kozol states
that more than one-third of American adults cannot read successfully.
David Harman, the author of Illiteracy: A National Dilemma, observes
that "more and more working members of mainstream America
are found to be either totally illiterate or unable to read at
the level presumably required by their job or their position in
society."
B. Helen Liu - 1 views
-
-
Many educators, educational policymakers, and individuals with public influence have suggested that television watching has indeed lowered the academic performance of school children, both in reading and writing, and in mathematics. Support for such assertions frequently appears on television screens. Although children may learn the meaning of some words from watching television, television viewing presumably lessens the time they spend on homework, reading books, listening to adult conversation, and other activities with greater potential (than watching television) for the development of vocabulary, a major component of an individual's literacy proficiency. The increase in television watching by adults may also have adversely affected their development and retention of vocabulary by decreasing such activities as reading and conversing.
Is technology producing a decline in critical thinking and analysis? | UCLA - 0 views
-
Reading for pleasure, which has declined among young people in recent decades, enhances thinking and engages the imagination in a way that visual media such as video games and television do not, Greenfield said.
-
"No one medium is good for everything," Greenfield said. "If we want to develop a variety of skills, we need a balanced media diet. Each medium has costs and benefits in terms of what skills each develops."
-
"Studies show that reading develops imagination, induction, reflection and critical thinking, as well as vocabulary," Greenfield said. "Reading for pleasure is the key to developing these skills. Students today have more visual literacy and less print literacy. Many students do not read for pleasure and have not for decades."
Technology destroying literacy | renée a. schuls-jacobson - 0 views
-
The author points out, however, that this is not the way teens use the Internet technology that is available to them. Teens don’t independently look up information about history or art or follow politics or listen to any music except popular music. Young users have learned to upload and download, surf and chat, post and design, play games and buy things online, but they haven’t learned to analyze a complex text, store facts in their heads, comprehend foreign policy, take lessons from history, or spell correctly. They require teachers, parents, religious leaders and employers to teach to pull them from their adolescent ethos towards a more mature ethic which will expose them to the idea of serious work, civic duty, financial independence, personal and family responsibility.
-
I truly believe (and now have well researched and documented support, thanks to Bauerlein) that all this screen time is leading us down the path to a place of incivility that breeds incompetence in school and the workplace. I see people losing their ability to connect to each other. And, as a teacher and a writer, I want to be that bridge, so I have to work on being that bridge.
-
"The author points out, however, that this is not the way teens use the Internet technology that is available to them. Teens don't independently look up information about history or art or follow politics or listen to any music except popular music. Young users have learned to upload and download, surf and chat, post and design, play games and buy things online, but they haven't learned to analyze a complex text, store facts in their heads, comprehend foreign policy, take lessons from history, or spell correctly. They require teachers, parents, religious leaders and employers to teach to pull them from their adolescent ethos towards a more mature ethic which will expose them to the idea of serious work, civic duty, financial independence, personal and family responsibility."
On the box - is television good or bad for children? | National Literacy Trust - 0 views
"Technology through television has contributed to a increase in literacy skills." - 0 views
we must refute this. anyone who can please research in your spare time
State and County Literacy Estimates - State Estimates - 0 views
-
New York
Kids' TV time linked to school woes, bad habits - CNN.com - 0 views
-
Each additional hour of TV that toddlers watch per week translates into poorer classroom behavior, lower math scores, less physical activity, and more snacking at age 10, according to a new study in the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.
-
Another theory is that the act of watching television can harm developing brains. A child's brain triples in size within the first three years of life in response to external stimulation, says Dr. Dimitri Christakis, M.D., a professor of pediatrics at the University of Washington and the country's foremost expert on the health effects of TV in childhood.
-
"Early exposure to [television] can actually be over-stimulating for the developing brain, and that can lead to shorter attention spans [and] cognitive difficulties," says Christakis, the author of "The Elephant in the Living Room: Make Television Work for Your Kids."
1 - 9 of 9
Showing 20▼ items per page