I will be honest that not being biased in this case is a hard thing to accomplish. I feel very strongly towards team "B's" opinion, however Team "A" had an incredibly compelling argument and I agree they information was given outright, numerical data was presented in a more functional way, and cited well with a works cited page as well. After forming an opinion on which had proposed a better argument I began to look into team "A's" resources. I did not love the idea of using "Blogspot" as a resource in a research paper, though in this case I have to say it is pretty acceptable the gentleman whom is the author of the blog, Friedrich Huebler has been a researcher on numerous projects posted by valid organizations. Laura Clark has written an estimated 1,200 articles for Dailymail.co.uk, also the information she has posted about research from the National Literacy trust is valid, one can simply go to their page, click research and a large list of surveys are available, the information that Ms. Clark provided is all readily at hand.Truly I can't think technology is the downfall of our children/ future children, though acronyms don't seem to be helping much, there are always bumps in the road to progress. Team "A's" argument seems to encompass that one has to conquer minor evils for a greater good.
David D. Connell

If I am not mistaken, everyone whom has participated thus far has read and agreed that team "A" had the better argument so a convergent statement from all of us, our names, and the sources team "A" provided is all we need for this assignment. If everyone could just re-read the directions for me and tell me if I am missing anything I would greatly appreciate it. Also tomorrow after finishing the document i will email all of you first to make sure you are ok with the final document. Sound good?

Hey Deon, I don't have your email to send the document to. Everyone else the email has been sent.