Is it surprising that this is going on (and has been for some time)? Is it constitutional to consider internet activity beyond the reaches of reasonable suspicion rules?
Was the Washington Post right to publish this story given the quote they included that called the releasing of this information "reprehensible" and a threat to US security?
Is it surprising that this is going on (and has been for some time)? Is it constitutional to consider internet activity beyond the reaches of reasonable suspicion rules?
Was the Washington Post right to publish this story given the quote they included that called the releasing of this information "reprehensible" and a threat to US security?
To Top