Skip to main content

Home/ T531 Summer 2012/ Group items tagged state

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Craig Willey

New Advocacy Groups Shaking Up Education Field - 1 views

  •  
    Their sway over policy and politics appears to be growing, especially at the state and local levels. A new generation of education advocacy groups has emerged to play a formidable political role in states and communities across the country.
  •  
    Interesting article! I think that advocacy groups pushing for the interests of CHILDREN is something that has been long overdue to the reformation of urban education. Also, I read about Rhee in a different article, for anyone that is interested and wants any more background knowledge. Link is below: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1862444-1,00.html
  •  
    I used the link to Indiana's Democrats for Education Reform and found information about a budget proposal for next year. They are discussing adding additional cost to states and districts that are already under economic stress! Democrats for Education Reform - Indiana: http://www.dfer.org/branches/in/
Randy Ebright

JACKSON: Tenure reform crucial to improving urban schools | The Asbury Park Press NJ | ... - 0 views

  • The Black Ministers’ Council has long supported, and continues to support, efforts like the Opportunity Scholarship Act for children in our lowest-performing urban schools.
  • a teacher’s ability to increase student achievement on standardized assessments tracks improved life outcomes for those students in critical areas,
  • Our urban students are more likely to be assigned an inexperienced teacher — which is bad for both the teacher and the student — more likely to have a substitute and more likely to have a teacher teaching out-of-subject specialization.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Given the premise that teachers are vital and that students’ ability to demonstrate their knowledge is equally important — which should seem obvious but is hotly contested — it only follows that the conference and acquisition of tenure should be linked in some manner to these factors.
  • We change how teachers are evaluated and how we reward them with the prestige of tenure.
  • What is true here is that the current system is utterly unfair to students
  • an excellent teacher and a quality education.
  •  
    This article discusses how many urban schools struggle with the plague of inexperienced and/or ineffective teachers because teachers with experience, as well as those who have proven to be effective, are often drawn away from urban schools and into suburban/private schools. Additionally, this article states the if the goal is to give each student an equal opportunity to succeed in the classroom and in life, then teachers need to be evaluated based on their students' scores and not on years of experience so that each school can have effective teachers. 
  •  
    It seems like most schools always want the teachers that have experience, but how are new teachers to gain experience if they are not given any opportunities? Schools need to work with new teachers that are unexperienced and help them gain the knowledge and insights they need to become a successful teacher in an urban school.
  •  
    I can't help but wonder why teachers are drawn away from urban schools to suburban/private schools. Why did they teach in urban schools in the first place? While there is surely a wide range of reasons, I am reminded of an article I recently read about the "missionary" mentality, where a sub-group of teachers (as the result of their lived experiences) naively think that Black and Brown students need to be saved from themselves and their communities. As you can see, this mindset is the product of deficit orientations to what students know and are able to do. I continue to want to know what solidarity looks like between students and teachers, and how to develop that. It should be noted, too, that this is not just a White teacher thing. Though less attention has been given to it, I have seen Black and Latina/o teachers "other" their students of color. I'll save my explanation for why I think this happens, but the point is that we grow up and are socialized to strive for and attain a certain standard, based on a certain value system. When this doesn't align with others' values, we tend to make judgements about what is "right" and "best". Obviously, this is bigger than teacher preparation programs, but teacher ed. programs can offer different kinds of experiences that afford candidates opportuntites to see students, families and communities in a different light. Same with practicing teachers - I'm reminded of the Funds of Knowledge work our of Tucson, AZ (Norma Gonzalez, Luis Moll et al.) Definitely raised some good points, Randy and Jordan.
Sarah Livengood

If Schools Are Broken, What Is the Solution? Answer: Urban School Reform-WRONG! - 18 views

"An urban portfolio of choices is sensible policy when you are uncertain which ways are best to get low-income children to learn and achieve in school." Deborah Meier would agree that choices are ...

Jenn Renner

Education Reform Consensus Grows on Fixing Urban Schools - US News and World Report - 4 views

  • In a land where education opportunity is supposed to be the great equalizer, the average black or Hispanic 12th grader in the United States today has the reading and math skills of a white eighth grader. White parents would be up in arms if their 17-yearold sons and daughters had the cognitive skills of 13-year-olds
  • Spellings and Duncan affirmed that they, too, believed closing the achievement gap was the nation's enduring civil rights challenge. Even in the face of poverty, great schools matter, Duncan suggested.
  • None of the speakers at the rally fell back on tired nostrums to excuse the poor performance of minority students or to justify the need for new spending. Not a single civil rights leader said that disadvantaged students are too burdened by poverty to perform well in school.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • They did not say that the solution to the achievement gap was to shower new money on urban schools.
  •  
    This article makes a great point about an achievement gap statistic. A black or Hispanic 12th grader has reading and math skills comparable to a white 8th grader. I appreciate this article because there are no excuses, just a desire to fix what is broken.
  • ...1 more comment...
  •  
    The quote that stood out to me was Mayor Booker, who said, "I am no longer concerned with right and left. I just want to go forward!" Until we can set politics aside and focus on what really causes students growth, it's going to be hard to make much progress. I know that in Indiana, at least, any votes on education reform seem to be pretty split down party lines. Are these decisions being driven by experts in education, or by politics and finances?
  •  
    I appreciate the reality of this article. Normally, I get upset when I read about educational reform; however, this article laid out a truth to reform. I agree that the decisions of our government went "the wrong way on education." But, I appreciate Booker's message: "I am no longer concerned with right and left. I just want to go forward!" This is what we all need to focus on. Our students. They need to be what we fight for.
  •  
    Yet another article about school reform that completely leaves the role of parents out. Until parents have the ability to support their children at home and set high, achievable expectations, true reform will never be possible. Unfortunately, this is one aspect of that administrators cannot control, no matter how many reform plans they invent or enact.
Lauren Dunlap

Urban Schools Need Better Teachers, Not Excuses, to Close the Education Gap - US News a... - 6 views

shared by Lauren Dunlap on 14 May 12 - No Cached
  •  
    No single impediment to closing the nation's shameful achievement gap looms larger than the culture of excuse that now permeates our schools. Too many educators today excuse teachers, principals, and school superintendents who fail to substantially raise the performance of low-income minority students by claiming that schools cannot really be held accountable for student achievement because disadvantaged students bear multiple burdens of poverty.
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    I thought the quote about how poverty will never change until urban schools are successful was powerful. The article plays off the one in our first module assignment. Students that are not successful in urban schools are looking at a bleak future in poverty.
  •  
    I also thought the comments regarding the correlation between fixing education and fixing poverty to be interesting. It would be simple say that we can't fix schools until we fix poverty, however, the author, in my opinion, makes a better argument that we can't fix poverty until we fix schools. We have to educate children, and at a very young age what life is going to be with or without an education. Like the article we read in the preparation section, the focus should be starting school at an earlier age and providing students with after school activities that keep them away from the streets.
  •  
    I think this article is a little scary in the fact that everyone is looking for someone to tell them that it's not their fault. I can see this article serving as a way for someone to say that "if my kid is failing a class it has to be the teacher's fault!" I know that we have some bad teachers and as a teacher myself I always put the blame on myself first when kids struggle, but I also know that when a kid skips 30 days of school a year, sleeps in class and does homework about once a month, they are to blame as well as the teacher for their lack of success.
  •  
    I agree 100%. I thought this article was extremely effective because it did not dismiss the impact a student's low socioeconomic background has on his/her education, but it did thoroughly explain and provide evidence for the understanding that teachers can be effective no matter what environment a student comes from if the teacher is motivated, competent, and creative. Some teachers I have had the "pleasure" of working with are quick to take credit for themselves when their students succeed, but are just as quick (sometimes quicker) to blame students' failures on their low socioeconomic backgrounds. Effective teachers are effective regardless of students' socioeconomic background though their socioeconomic background does factor in to the type of instructional and classroom management strategies a creative and innovative teacher should implement. One of the studies cited in the article explained that "The results suggest that the freedom conferred on charters to hire teachers and principals and to shape school culture made a huge difference in subsequent student performance." I see ineffective teachers in my building who the administrators are fearful to confront while younger teachers are putting in more work, time, and energy only to receive more tasks which other, more experienced teachers refuse to complete. Teachers should be evaluated solely on their effectiveness in the classroom, not their years of experience. When this is done, students in all classroom settings, including urban schools, will achieve higher success.
  •  
    I agree with Edward in that accountability should not be placed solely on the perceived effectiveness of the teacher. I work with a particular student who has missed almost 80 days of school this year due to illness. While most of her sick days were legitimate, there have been many other times where she should have been at school but was not (including a time period of nearly 2 weeks that she and her siblings missed because their mother had a miscarriage). Should the teacher be considered ineffective because this student did not pass the IREAD? I believe that we must also work with families to help encourage and foster a sense of the importance of education.
  •  
    I think a teacher's years of experience should matter because it carries over to how effective they are. A first year third grade teacher is not going to as effective as a ten-year third grade teacher.
  •  
    Very convincing and persuasive......because we all want to believe that it's that easy. If we are good teachers, all the education problems are solved. Poverty will be eliminated and suffering will cease because we, as teachers, have that power. After all, most of us probably went in to education to help others and be an instrument of change in the world. But I have a hard time believing that it's really that simple. I would like to dig a little deeper into the statistical improvements that the stated charter schools have made. I don't want to give off the impression that i don't think there is a solution to the problems of educating the economically challenged. I believe education is the answer to a better world. But I don't believe the answer education's woes is as simple as "no excuses".
Julie Chambers

Suburban Schools Are Getting the Urban Experience - Finding Common Ground - Education Week - 7 views

  • Students walk in shaped by their parents' ideas and school is a place where those ideas converge. Given the right circumstances, schools can be a great experience for students.
  • Many would agree that schools need to change, but the present situation is forcing schools to change for the worse, not the better. Public schools are in the midst of a perfect storm.
  • During a time when one big initiative would be a lot for schools, many are the middle of three. Those three are adopting the Common Core State Standards, teacher and administrator evaluation and budget cuts. All three together could have devastating effects on the public school system and we seem to be surrounded by people who really don't care.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • As the political game is controlling the education students receive, it is time for suburban, urban and rural teachers, parents and administrators to show that they are the true lobbyists for children.
  •  
    This article highlights some of the changes that suburban schools are just now facing, that urban schools have been facing for years. 
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    It's interesting to see how these suburban schools are handling what urban schools have been dealing with for many years. Residency has always been a huge issue where I teach. Students who live in the district move out, and continue to attend the same school without any type of notification to the teacher or school. In so many cases it is not discovered until there is a problem with a student's attendance.
  •  
    Interesting article. It's a good debate. It is frustrating to see schools who have everything: 4 star rating, award winning sports, academics, and music teams, and all the best equipment, while others have holes in the ceiling and technology that is severly outdated. Is it fair, however, to take some of these things away from them in order to level the playing field? To stop having great and less than great schools and make them all equally mediocre.
  •  
    The first paragraph in this article touches on "teachable moments". This was a key point that I disagreed with in Kennedy's book. She wrote so much about how distractions in the school setting take away from their learning time. That the time we have students should be focused completely on the academic content. Her stance doesn't take in account the valuable "teachable moment" times-sometimes the content instruction needs to stop in order to address an issue that just pops up. Our students are still learning from these moments, even though they are not tested over them.
  •  
    "If you ever take the time to get on Twitter and see some of the comments going back and forth between educators, consultants and educational historians, you will notice that they are at their breaking point, which if done right can lead to a better place." In my most optimistic moments, I like to believe that all the chaos and change in education will eventually work out for the best. I like to believe that even though I disagree with most of the political discourse, there are too many good people in and around schools working too hard for us not to eventually be in "a better place".
  •  
    Brain, I wish I could "like" your comment! I have the same thought and hope for education as well. So many people want to make schools better for students and are working towards that goal; unfortunately, it seems like most of them are working against each other (reformers, government, teachers, administration, etc.). I just have to think that everyone will eventually figure out what is best for the students and start working together...
  •  
    I thought the first section you highlighted about kids and their parents perceptions is valuable. It is a 2 way street between home and school and it has to be united for student success. If parents are not supportive and can not help their students, clearly there is going to be decrease in student performance. I think families are the most important relationship to establish. There are so many different groups that need to come together in order to fix this crisis...the thought seems difficult...almost impossible.
  •  
    One point that I thought Kennedy left out of her arguments was parent support. Oftentimes, students are coming to schools with their parents' view of school, both positive and negative. If parents had trouble in school or have negative feelings toward schooling, they are less likely to be positive about it with their kids. The amount of support at home can make or break a student. Furthermore, reforms can come and go, but parent support is often the determining factor of success. This trend may begin to exemplify that notion as both urban and suburban schools face the same issues. I will be interested to see if the parents of the students in suburban schools are much more supportive and the difference that will make when the playing field is evened.
Jenn Renner

The Limits of School Reform - NYTimes.com - 10 views

  • Going back to the famous Coleman report in the 1960s, social scientists have contended — and unquestionably proved — that students’ socioeconomic backgrounds vastly outweigh what goes on in the school as factors in determining how much they learn.
  • Yet the reformers act as if a student’s home life is irrelevant. “There is no question that family engagement can matter,” said Klein when I spoke to him. “But they seem to be saying that poverty is destiny, so let’s go home.
  • Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive.
  •  
    The article, by Jonathan Mahler, was about the heroic efforts of Ramón González, the principal of M.S. 223, a public middle school in the South Bronx, to make his school a place where his young charges can get a decent education and thus, perhaps, a better life.
  • ...5 more comments...
  •  
    Before reading this article, I did not realize that reformers tend to avoid the issue of students' home lives when considering reform--now I understand why Kennedy only focuses on teachers and the classroom environment when discussing reform. However, with all of the research done that tells us how much impact a child's home life can play in their education, why isn't there more focus on this issue? I can only assume it is because it is easier to reach schools and teachers rather than the communities and families, but this method does not seem to be working, in my opinion.
  •  
    "Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive." I think this is a good point. Although good teaching is the most essential part of school reform, it's not the only factor that makes children successful. Like Gonzalez, there have been times that I have really worked with a particular student and gotten them started toward success, only to have them move back into a bad situation, drop out of school to work, or some similar situation that is largely beyond my control. I'm not trying to make excuses, but just as I get frustrated when a student does poorly on one test and is judged by a single measure, it can be frustrating as a teacher when one or two statistics are used to judge your entire career.
  •  
    Jenn and Jill, I made a sticky note of the same quote: "Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive." I think it is important for schools and reformers to see that school reform is all encompassing with many counterparts and players. I also liked how the article ended with that reform should be handled with a "dose of humility". Fingers shouldn't be pointed when school reform needs to be analyzed by what it has and doesn't have. Thanks for sharing this NYT article - I really enjoyed it.
  •  
    I think this also brings up a good point about exactly where reform efforts can be best put to good use. It's obviously not intended to simply write off students given their socio-economic background or home life. Yet as Joe Nocera highlights from the article that affected him, a single teacher working closely with a student begins to yield results. It would be interesting to see if it's just considered to be from the academic-related help his teacher is giving him, or from the other support - mainly that there is now an adult taking interest in what he does with his life (texts in the mornings to encourage him to attend class, taking the time to show that he has someone to emotionally support him while his mother "comes across as indifferent to his schooling") that he is being shown. It is likely a tremendous combination of both the emotional and academic support, which I think would help to shed light on some ways that reform efforts would be most effective. This piece indicates that a positive influence providing stability could bring just as much (or more) results than anything done to renovate efforts in front of a class of students (which, as Kennedy pointed out, frequently don't get implemented as reformers envision).
  •  
    I think Nocera has some very valid points about why present-day school reform doesn't lead to more immediate changes. It seems as though reformers have been focused on important issues, but ones that are not attacking the problem. While socioeconomic status has been proven capable of overcoming obstacles, it does play a huge factor in the success of students. With that being said, simply attacking the teachers or the instruction isn't the answer either. As Nocera states, "Demonizing teachers for the failures of poor students, and pretending that reforming the schools is all that is needed, as the reformers tend to do, is both misguided and counterproductive." I absolutely agree.
  •  
    Educational reforms are rarely about students and while they typically boast the mission of "student success" the majority of teachers and educators I have come into contact with feel a great disconnect between those enacting reforms and the needs they have in the classroom. One of Abraham Lincoln's strongest leadership principles was to "ciculate among the troops" however, it is a very rare event for central office leaders in a school district and the legislators that pass reforms actually set foot in a school much less engage with the teachers who are "on the front lines" in order to learn what the struggles are in today's educational environments.
  •  
    I think while us (teachers) are wanting reformers to take a "walk in our shoes" with what goes on a day-to-day basis, we teachers have to stop and think no matter what we judge, or want to believe, we have no idea what goes on from the time our students leave in the afternoon until the time they come back the next day. This article goes to show that "yes," 80% of a student's learning comes from school, but then there is that 20% that needs to come from the home.
1 - 7 of 7
Showing 20 items per page