this article is from the British Journal of Occupational Therapy. This article is an opiion piece written to discuss inconsistencies in the practice and theory of supervision and in provision of training. The article states that OT has endorsed the practice of clinical supervision to promote high quality services and professional accountability however, would suggest the profession should adopt a theoretical framework for supervision, make their expectations explicit, and build an infrastructure including training and audit to demonstrate the effectiveness of supervision in improving patient care as well as supporting staff growth.
Brayman, S. J., Clark, G. F., DeLany, J. V., Garza, E. R., Radomski, M. V., Ramsey, R., ... & Lieberman, D. (2003). Guidelines for supervision, roles, and responsibilities during the delivery of occupational therapy services (2004). The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 58(6), 663-667.
started by courtneycoe on 07 Aug 15
Brayman, S. J., Clark, G. F., DeLany, J. V., Garza, E. R., Radomski, M. V., Ramsey, R., ... & Lieberman, D. (2003). Guidelines for supervision, roles, and responsibilities during the delivery of occupational therapy services (2004). The American journal of occupational therapy: official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association, 58(6), 663-667.