Skip to main content

Home/ SoftwareEngineering/ Group items tagged Java

Rss Feed Group items tagged

kuni katsuya

Chapter 12. ActionScript 3 Reflection API - 0 views

  •  ActionScript 3 Reflection API
  • describeType
  • method returns
  • ...5 more annotations...
  • XML data
    • kuni katsuya
       
      why gawd, whhhhhhhhhyyy...
  • describing its parameter object and is therefore not type-safe and its use is subject to many syntax errors.
  • GraniteDS provides a Java-like reflection API that encapsulates describeType calls and offers a type-safe, object-oriented, set of reflection classes and methods
  • caches its results for better performance
  • supports advanced features such as ApplicationDomain and namespaces
kuni katsuya

Mapping JPA Entities To SQL Views - It Works Even With Derby : Adam Bien's Weblog - 0 views

  • Mapping JPA Entities To SQL View
  • return a different “view” to the client
  • Especially in the context of pagination, where the data is mostly retrieved for read-only purposes, database views are the easier and more efficient alternative. Instead of implementing a lot of plumbing on the “Java-side” all the work could be easily done in the database
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • There is a drawback: not all views are updatable. Whether a view is updatable or not highly depends on the complexity and particular database
kuni katsuya

Comparing JSF Beans, CDI Beans and EJBs | Andy Gibson - 0 views

  • differences between CDI beans and EJBs is that EJBs are : Transactional Remote or local Able to passivate stateful beans freeing up resources Able to make use of timers Can be asynchronous
  • Stateless EJBs can be thought of as thread safe single-use beans that don’t maintain any state between two web requests
  • Stateful EJBs do hold state and can be created and sit around for as long as they are needed until they are disposed of
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Stateless beans must have a dependent scope while a stateful session bean can have any scope. By default they are transactional, but you can use the transaction attribute annotation.
  • CDI beans can be injected into EJBs and EJBs can be injected into CDI beans
  • When to use which bean How do you know when to use which bean? Simple.
  • In general, you should use CDI beans unless you need the advanced functionality available in the EJBs such as transactional functions. You can write your own interceptor to make CDI beans transactional, but for now, its simpler to use an EJB until CDI gets transactional CDI beans which is just around the corner
  • Comparing JSF Beans, CDI Beans and EJBs
  • JSF Managed Beans
  • In short, don’t use them if you are developing for Java EE 6 and using CDI. They provide a simple mechanism for dependency injection and defining backing beans for web pages, but they are far less powerful than CDI beans.
  • JSF beans cannot be mixed with other kinds of beans without some kind of manual coding.
  • CDI Beans
  • includes a complete, comprehensive managed bean facility
  • interceptors, conversation scope, Events, type safe injection, decorators, stereotypes and producer methods
  • JSF-like features, you can define the scope of the CDI bean using one of the scopes defined in the javax.enterprise.context package (namely, request, conversation, session and application scopes). If you want to use the CDI bean from a JSF page, you can give it a name using the javax.inject.Named annotation
  • Comparing JSF Beans, CDI Beans and EJBs
  • Comparing JSF Beans, CDI Beans and EJBs
  • JSF Managed Beans
kuni katsuya

Lean service architectures with Java EE 6 - JavaWorld - 0 views

  • Entity-Control-Boundary (ECB) architectural pattern matches perfectly with our pattern language
  • domain structure is an Entity, the Control is a service, and the Boundary is realized with a facade
  • In simpler cases the facade and service can collapse, and a service would be realized only as a facade's method in that case
kuni katsuya

Lean service architectures with Java EE 6 - JavaWorld - 0 views

  • DAOs aren't dead, but they cannot be considered as a general best practice any more. They should be created in a bottom-up, rather than a top-down, fashion. If you discover data-access code duplication in your service layer, just factor it out to a dedicated DAO and reuse it. Otherwise it is just fine to delegate to an EntityManager from a service. The enforcement of an empty DAO layer is even more harmful, because it requires you to write dumb code for even simple use cases. The more code is produced, the more time you must spend to write tests and to maintain it.
  • With JDK 1.5 and the advent of generics, it is possible to build and deploy a generic, convenient, and typesafe DAO once and reuse it from variety of services
  •  
    DAOs aren't dead, but they cannot be considered as a general best practice any more. They should be created in a bottom-up, rather than a top-down, fashion. If you discover data-access code duplication in your service layer, just factor it out to a dedicated DAO and reuse it. Otherwise it is just fine to delegate to an EntityManager from a service. The enforcement of an empty DAO layer is even more harmful, because it requires you to write dumb code for even simple use cases. The more code is produced, the more time you must spend to write tests and to maintain it.
kuni katsuya

Lean service architectures with Java EE 6 - JavaWorld - 0 views

  • key ingredients of a service-oriented component: Facade: Provides simplified, centralized access to the component and decouples the client from the concrete services. It is the network and transaction boundary. Service: The actual implementation of business logic. Domain structure: This is a structure rather than an object. It implements the component's persistence and exposes all of its state to the services, without encapsulation.
  • This convention not only standardizes the structure and improves maintainability, but also allows automatic dependency validation with frameworks like JDepend, Checkstyle,  Dependometer, SonarJ, or XRadar. You can even perform the validation at build time. If you do, the continuous build would break on violation of defined dependencies. The rules are clearly defined with strict layering: a facade may access a service, and the service a domain object, but not vice versa
kuni katsuya

InfoQ: Dan Allen on Arquillian Testing Framework - 0 views

  • Arquillian Testing Framework
  • Arquillian is an integration and functional testing platform that can be used for Java middleware testing. With the main goal of making integration (and functional) tests as simple to write as unit tests, it brings the tests to the runtime environment, freeing developers from managing the runtime from within the test.
« First ‹ Previous 341 - 360 of 421 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page