inner class Builder is in charge of creating Customer instances
mandatory fields – either primitive (e.g. id) or annotated with @NotNull (e.g. lastName) – are part of the builder's constructor
all optional fields setter methods on the builder are provided
newly created Customer instance is validated using the Validator#validate() method
impossible to retrieve an invalid Customer instance
extract the validation routine into a base class:
abstract class AbstractBuilder<T>
T build() throws ConstraintViolationException
protected abstract T buildInternal();
private static Validator validator
Concrete builder classes have to
extend AbstractBuilder
must implement the buildInternal() method:
Builder extends AbstractBuilder<Customer>
@Override
protected Customer buildInternal()
Implementing the Builder Pattern using the Bean Validation API
variation of the Builder design pattern for instantiating objects with multiple optional attributes.
this pattern frees you from providing multiple constructors with the different optional attributes as parameters (hard to maintain and hard to read for clients)
or providing setter methods for the optional attributes
(require objects to be mutable, can leave objects in inconsistent state)
but don’t know how those dependencies are instantiated
And you shouldn’t really care, all that is important is that UserService depends on dao and webservice object.
BDD template given-when-then) tests are easy to read
@Entity
public class User
calling new User(“someName”,”somePassowrd”, “someOtherName”, “someOtherPassword”) becomes hardly readable and maintainable
code duplication
Maintaining this code would turn into a nightmare in no time
running the code above will throw an exception by the JPA provider,
since not-nullable password field was never set.
Joshua Blooch gives fine example of builder pattern.
Instead of making the desired object directly, the client calls a constructor (or static factory) with all of the required parameters and gets a builder object. Then the client calls setter-like methods on the builder object to set each optional parameter of interest. Finally, the client calls a parameterless build method to generate the object, which is immutable. The builder is a static member class of the class it builds.
Coffee
public static class Builder
Builder(CoffeeType type, int cupSize)
Builder withMilk()
Coffee build()
Coffee(this)
private Coffee(Builder builder)
Coffee coffee = new Coffee.Builder(CoffeeType.Expresso, 3).withMilk().build();2}
especially if most of those parameters are optional.
For all entity attributes I create private fields
those that are obligatory become parameters for the public constructor
parameter-less constructor, I create one, but I give him