Group items tagged

71% of senior-level execs were worried about risks associated with social media, with 13% saying they are “very concerned.”

listed the potential for negative comments about the company (36%), disclosure of proprietary information (32%), and out-of-date information (18%) as the most worrying. They were less worried about accidental exposure of personally identifiable information, fraud, and corporate executives (i.e., themselves) doing something embarrassing or incriminating on line.

Among public companies, the top concern was disclosure of proprietary information (50%), followed by negative comments, out-of-date information, and fraud, each at 17%.

The labor board’s rulings, which apply to virtually all private sector employers, generally tell companies that it is illegal to adopt broad social media policies — like bans on “disrespectful” comments or posts that criticize the employer — if those policies discourage workers from exercising their right to communicate with one another with the aim of improving wages, benefits or working conditions.

Employers often seek to discourage comments that paint them in a negative light. Don’t discuss company matters publicly, a typical social media policy will say, and don’t disparage managers, co-workers or the company itself. Violations can be a firing offense. But in a series of recent rulings and advisories, labor regulators have declared many such blanket restrictions illegal.

The National Labor Relations Board says workers have a right to discuss work conditions freely and without fear of retribution, whether the discussion takes place at the office or on Facebook.

So, how can brands ensure social media compliance? They need Social Compliance They need Social Listening They need Social Engagement

“This consumer complaint raises a number of concerns about Facebook’s privacy policies and practices,” the committee leaders wrote in the letter. “Facebook’s systems lack transparency as to how they are able to gather personal information and synthesize that information into suggestions of relevant medical condition support groups. Labeling these groups as closed or anonymous potentially misled Facebook users into joining these groups and revealing more personal information than they otherwise would have. And Facebook may have failed to properly notify group members that their personal health information may have been accessed by health insurance companies and online bullies, among others.”