Skip to main content

Home/ SHU17/ Group items tagged sat

Rss Feed Group items tagged

John Chandler

Study: High school grades best predictor of college success - not SAT/ACT scores - 0 views

  •  
    Study: High school grades best predictor of college success - not SAT/ACT scores
  •  
    One of my favorite topics to discuss. And why do we think the SAT is going to be redesigned for Class of 2016? Clearly because we need to align it to the Common Core. More info to come on this....what do you think John?
Tobi Knehr

Great Opinion Piece in NY Times: "Save Us from the SAT" | Diane Ravitch's blog - 1 views

    • Tobi Knehr
       
      Interesting read.
  • A wonderful article appeared in today’s New York Times about the SAT.
Alisha Trusty

The SAT Impact - Leadership 360 - Education Week - 0 views

  •  
    The SAT Impact
  •  
    And the SAT redesign....
Lois Whipple

College Board SAT Partnership | Khan Academy - 0 views

  •  
    The partnership between Khan Academy and the College Board directly addresses one of the greatest inequities around college entrance exams: the culture of high-priced test preparation. Now, for the first time, all students have the opportunity to practice for the SAT with completely free, best-in-class materials
John Chandler

The Story Behind the SAT Overhaul - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    Does the SAT have real value?
Kelly OLeary

Should More Low-Income Students Apply to Highly Selective Colleges? - 0 views

  •  
    Conceptual and Methodological Problems in Research on College Undermatch "Access to the nation's most selective colleges remains starkly unequal, with students in the lowest income quartile constituting less than 4% of enrollment," say Michael Bastedo and Allyson Flaster (University of Michigan/Ann Arbor) in this article in Educational Researcher. "Students in the top SES quartile comprise 69% of enrollment at institutions that admit fewer than a third of their applicants…" One increasingly popular explanation for this enrollment gap is undermatching - academically able low-income students not applying to selective colleges for which they are qualified, settling instead for lower-tier institutions. Bastedo and Flaster are skeptical about this theory for three reasons First, they don't believe there is good evidence about the life benefits of attending different tiers of college, and most measures of college "quality" are quite unscientific. Life advantages might accrue at the extremes - going to a highly selective college versus a low-quality community college - but the evidence about the whole middle range is "quite muddy," say Bastedo and Flaster. Among the factors that need to be looked at more carefully are a college's graduation rate, students' debt burden, placement in graduate or professional schools, and post-graduate earnings. Second, the authors question whether it's possible for researchers to predict which low-income students will get into selective colleges to which they haven't yet applied. Competition for seats in these colleges has become much more intense in recent years, and extra-curricular activities, alumni parents, athletic prowess, and other intangibles play an increasingly important part. In many of these areas, higher-SES students have great advantages. Third, even if we look only at SAT scores and GPAs, high-achieving disadvantaged students are still not as competitive as the undermatching advocate
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20 items per page