The Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) is addressing this problem with Mind’s Eye, a program aimed at developing a visual intelligence capability for unmanned systems.
Josh Harris' Wired City | Fast Company - 0 views
Palantir, the War on Terror's Secret Weapon - BusinessWeek - 0 views
CIA's 'Facebook' Program Dramatically Cut Agency's Costs | Onion News Network - 1 views
Being Human 2020 - 0 views
Facebook and facial recognition - you've been tagged - 0 views
-
Published: June 10, 2011 Facebook and facial recognition – you’ve been tagged Author David White Postdoctoral Research Fellow at University of New South Wales Disclosure Statement David White is employed on an ARC Linkage Grant in collaboration with Australia Passports. Our goal is to ensure the content is not compromised in any way. We therefore ask all authors to disclose any potential conflicts of interest before publication. Re-publish We licence our articles under Creative Commons — attribution, no derivatives. Anyone can re-publish our content provided they follow some simple guidelines. Your Facebook snaps now come with a hidden catch. rishibando Around 2 million photographs are uploaded to Facebook each day. As of this week, every new image will be processed by automatic face recognition software, designed to identify the people in the photographs.
-
2 million photographs are uploaded to Facebook each day. As of this week, every new image will be processed by automatic face recognition software, designed to identify the people in the photographs. It's not the addition of this new function that has caused the creeping sense of unease, but the covert manner with which it has been activated
Sarif Industries - 0 views
Reflections on Wikileaks, Spycatcher and Freedom of the Press - speech given to Sydney ... - 1 views
-
Malcolm Turbull on Wikileaks, "There will be a medium term impact on the candour with which people talk to American officials. Frankly if I were an American citizen I would be less outraged with Assange than I would be with a Government that can allow such a gigantic breach of security. The United States will need to demonstrate that it has changed its ways, and it is not that hard. Most large organisations will not permit downloading of material to an external medium without express authorisation as those of you who work for large firms should already know. And it goes without saying that if a young Private can copy so much classified material off his own volition, how vulnerable are US systems to more sophisticated operatives who have the backing and expertise provided by foreign intelligence agencies. We will remain forever, I imagine, rightly angry at the recklessness of receiving and publishing so much confidential material. So far it seems less harm has been done than might have been the case, but the risks are extraordinary and if only one life was lost, if only one sensitive operation was compromised then the heavy responsibility for that must lie with Assange. I would like to hope that in the future such revelations will be more discriminating, but it is hard to be confident. The lesson for Governments, apart from improving their security, is to assume that everything said or written will, sooner or later, see the light of day. That may not be a good thing, and it certainly doesn't make life easier, but it is, I fear, a reality. The Governments with most to fear from such disclosure are those whose public statements are at odds with their private opinions - and as I noted earlier so far it appears, to its credit, that the US State Department's private cables have been consistent with their public policy."
1 - 12 of 12
Showing 20▼ items per page