Another clever Romanian - important figure to look into. Anticipation interesting in same way as futureful and other concepts from Jarno Kopenen - semiotic thread runs though Pierre Levy's work as well on IEML
The analogy here is with goods that any number of people can share or that only one person can have.
a single object/state can be shared with a relatively small number of users/particles
Preventing oversubscription ensures that the population of users sample a wider range of DVDs, which in turn provides a broader range of recommendations.
Retailers are not just interested in renting DVDs or selling books or whatever. They want to maximise profits.
via @changeist there are ethical issues around intent, but full intermediation has some benefits for value metrics, will be interesting to see how this gets balanced, perhaps the value equation is the layer of indirection needed
subjective well-being is taken to be:2Good mental states, including all of the various evaluations, positive and negative, that peoplemake of their lives, and the affective reactions of people to their experiences
“subjective well-being is an umbrella term for the different valuationspeople make regarding their lives, the events happening to them, their bodies and minds,and the circumstances in which they live”.
In measuring overall human well-being then, subjective well-being should be placedalongside measures of non-subjective outcomes, such as income, health, knowledge andskills, safety, environmental quality and social connections
Inparticular, a distinction is commonly made between life evaluations, which involve acognitive evaluation of the respondent’s life as a whole (or aspects of it), and measures ofaffect, which capture the feelings experienced by the respondent at a particular point in time(Diener, 1984; Kahneman et al., 1999
eudaimonic aspect ofsubjective well-being, reflecting people’s sense of purpose and engagement
The framework used here covers all three concepts of well-being:●Life evaluation.●Affect.●Eudaimonia (psychological “flourishing”)
the result of a judgement by the individual rather than thedescription of an emotional state.
Elements of subjective well-beingLife evaluation
making an evaluation of this sort as involving the individual constructing a “standard” thatthey perceive as appropriate for themselves, and then comparing the circumstances oftheir life to that standard
Life evaluations are based on how people remember their experiences (Kahneman et al.,1999) and can differ significantly from how they actually experienced things at the time
It is for this reason that life evaluations are sometimes characterised as measures of“decision utility” in contrast to “experienced utility”
One of the mostwell documented measures of life evaluation – thePersonal Wellbeing Index– consists of eightquestions, covering satisfactions with eight different aspects of life, which are summedusing equal weights to calculate an overall index (International Wellbeing Group, 2006)
(job satisfaction, financial satisfaction, house satisfaction, healthsatisfaction, leisure satisfaction and environmental satisfaction),
AffectAffect is the term psychologists use to describe a person’s feelings. Measures of affectcan be thought of as measures of particular feelings or emotional states, and they aretypically measured with reference to a particular point in time.
Such measures capturehow people experience life rather than how they remember it (Kahneman and Krueger,2006
While an overall evaluation of life can be captured in a single measure, affect has atleast two distinct hedonic dimensions: positive affect and negative affect (Kahneman et al.,1999; Diener et al., 1999
positive affect is thought to be largely uni-dimensional
GitHub has no managers among its 140 employees, for example. “Everyone has management interests,” he said. “People can work on things that are interesting to them. Companies should exist to optimize happiness, not money. Profits follow.” He does, however, retain his own title and decides things like salaries.
Another member of GitHub has posted a talk that stresses how companies flourish when people want to work on certain things, not because they are told to.
Asana bases work on a series of to-do lists that people assign one another. Inside Asana there are no formal titles, though like GitHub there are bosses at the top who make final decisions.
Mr. Preston-Werner thinks the way open source requires a high degree of trust and collaboration among relative equals (plus a few high-level managers who define the scope of a job and make final decisions) can be extended more broadly, even into government.
GitHub’s popularity has also made it an important way for companies to recruit engineers, because some of the best people in the business are showing their work or dissecting the work of others inside some of the public pull requests.
For all the happiness and sharing, real money is involved here. In July GitHub received $100 million from the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. This early in most software companies’ lives, $20 million would be a fortune.
“For now this is about code, but we can make the burden of decision-making into an opportunity,” he said. “It would be useful if you could capture the process of decision-making, and see who suggested the decisions that created a law or a bill.”
Can this really be extended across a large, complex organization, however?
As complex as an open-source project may be, it is also based on a single, well-defined outcome, and an engineering task that is generally free of concepts like fairness and justice, about which people can debate endlessly.
Google once prided itself on few managers and fast action, but has found that getting big can also involve lots more meetings.
Still, these fast-rising successes may be on to something more than simply universalizing the means of their own good fortune. An early guru of the Information Age, Peter Drucker, wrote often in the latter part of his career of the need for managers to define tasks, and for workers to seek fulfillment before profits.
the development of marketing is sensible to its environment and is hence already self-limiting itself according to the previously mentioned legal and social framework
neuromarketing
explore new inner dynamics of marketing, new directions in the field of possibilities offered by the current organology and its articulations between techniques and social organization in order to influence and shape marketing as an associative force – in opposition to its current dissociative force – in the larger psychic, social and technic organology
Fighting the attention and desire resource shortage: stoping to use advertisement?
The question is rather here to think the moderation of the psychopower
empower transindividuation, i.e. to make sure that an economic activity creates more possibilities of individuation than it tend to destroy by attempting to capture attention and canalize motivation in a funnel. Empower transindividuation would imply to empowering actors of their own lifestyle, winning back the savoir-vivre prescribing production
Should marketing stop using psychopower?
marketing ethics guidelines
transactions are more likely to be morally defensible if both parties enter it freely and fully informed
the goal of marketing should be to increase the likelihood and frequency of free and informed transactions in the marketplace
putting freedom as a criteria of morality
the industrial use of pycho- and neuropower tend to fall under the category of barriers to freedom
neurotechniques – to capture the attention
psychotechniques – to attempt to create motivation
Most people think commercials are a small price to pay for these benefits
advertising
denying the schemes of addiction and the fact that we are becoming through the objects of attentions
right to avoid attention capture by advertising
progress made in cognitive sciences proving that
reward system being abnormally stimulated
Advertisements exploit
vulnerability and reinforce their overconsumption behaviors
“if food advertising on TV were banned, significant reductions in the prevalence of childhood obesity are possible.” (Veerman et al. 2009)
What is at stake falls to be much more complex than the sole Freedom of Speech invoked for the advertiser
liberty of non-reception
would mean to guaranty every citizen the right to choose where and when he wants to access the advertising information
Change in the industrial and commercial paradigm
Economy of contribution and peer production
An economy of contribution means that users of a service are contributing to the production of these services.
example
is open-source software that are contributively build by potentially hundreds of developers organized in communities
minimize the gap between the producer and consumer
blur the frontier between professionals and amateurs
The Copernican revolution of the Vendor Relationship Management paradigm
change in the commercial paradigm, described as an Intention Economy i.e. the opposite of the Attention Economy
consumers are charged to express and discuss their intention
with businesses rather than the usual paradigm in which businesses where fighting for a piece of canalized motivation
Implementing such a system would nevertheless imply that marketing departments dispose of a system in which they could value their supplies and where they could be easily found by customers. Doc Searls promotes his answer to this issue: the Vendor Relationship Management system.
the belief that free customers are more valuable than captive ones — to themselves, to vendors, and to the larger economy.
To be free
1. Customers must enter relationships with vendors as independent actors.
2. Customers must be the points of integration for their own data.
3. Customers must have control of data they generate and gather. This means they must be able to share data selectively and voluntarily.
4. Customers must be able to assert their own terms of engagement.
5. Customers must be free to express their demands and intentions outside of any one company’s control.
This is a profoundly game-changing approach
big data that is the rush for consumers’ information potentially leading to the same dead-end of attention destruction and affective saturation than the former offline paradigm
VRM system working as a marketplace
the goal of marketing should be to increase the likelihood and frequency of free and informed transactions in the marketplace
less imperfect and less biased information in a cultural context overvaluing transparency, and a bigger atomicity due to the hereafter introduced trend for re-localized peer production.
3.2.2.3 VRM and externalization of the socialization process
Promoting the end of advertisement
means to find a new way to make the information circulate, what was the primary goal of advertisement
Until there is no alternative to massive advertisement campaign for the information circulation, it is indeed hard to ask entrepreneurs and managers to get rid of those successors of propaganda: such a transition process necessarily imply adaptation costs from the producer and the consumer side, and possible competitive disadvantage against competitors still maximizing profit through advertisement means
But the internet transformation of the general organology offers new way to think information circuits and potentially constitute an opportunity to externalize the socialization process of products that is to empower citizen-consumers organized in communities
Empowering groups of citizen doesn’t annihilate the risks of mis-use or counterproductive interest-taker behaviors but a well-designed system of trust between peers could minimize this risk by creating a dependency to what social capital other peers give you, as it is happening in the sharing economy: the credibility of a contributive peer would be guaranteed through what the P2P Foundation calls Feedback systems and peer-police
a strong structuration of products characteristics, allowing customers to personalize their choices according to their desire and constraints: such a “VRM+” system
Marketing would then be the art of being as high as possible in this ranking, as it is happening in SEO for search engines, but in this context of criteria explosion, marketing would then be the disciple of listening to customers’ wishes and aspiration needing an attention, in order to kick in the production or to adapt the following series.
3.2.2.4 Toward a possible equi-power
Such a system would tremendously re-configure the balance of power and tend toward a form of equi-power i.e. a social organization in which abuses of a “big” would be the potential object of a ranking sanction by the peers
self-regulative function
a form of economic Darwinism would let to conscious organization the right to curve their path toward a durable configuration in accordance with the social ecosystem.
the idea of equi-power is a form of homogenization of the social matter, in which the distortions in the balance of power would be compensated by the gathering of small forces sharing a common interest
Such a sanction systems, if successfully implemented, would make value-destructing businesses progressively decline and hopefully bankrupt,
long-term valuable strategic choice
long term satisfyingly high ranking
It would be utopic to think that the “being cool” marketing
would disappear, but marketers would have to make those two objectives compose together.
This social capital contagion is nevertheless a tool that would need to be controlled in its form of violence by extensive testings and iterations with forms of protections for the smallest peers, that is to say to keep this form of social violence to institutionalized, classic forms of businesses, clearly beyond the line of what should be acceptable in the global village.
the goal is here to create an artificial form of majority that is a self-censuring responsible behavior of corporations
an ontology designer makes these decisions based on the structural properties of a class.
an ontology is a
formal explicit description of concepts in a domain of discourse (classes (sometimes called concepts)), properties of each concept describing
various features and attributes of the concept (slots
(sometimes called roles or properties)), and restrictions on slots (facets (sometimes called role restrictions)). An ontology together with a
set of individual instances of classes
constitutes a knowledge base. In reality, there
is a fine line where the ontology ends and the knowledge base begins.
A class can have subclasses that
represent concepts that are more specific than the superclass.
Here we discuss general issues to consider and offer one
possible process for developing an ontology. We describe an iterative approach to ontology
development: we start with a rough first pass at the ontology. We then revise and refine
the evolving ontology and fill in the details. Along the way, we discuss the modeling
decisions that a designer needs to make, as well as the pros, cons, and implications of
different solutions.
In practical terms, developing an
ontology includes:
�
defining classes in the ontology,
�
arranging the classes in a taxonomic (subclass–superclass) hierarchy,
�
defining slots and describing allowed values for these slots,
�
filling in the values for slots for instances.
We can then create a knowledge base by
defining individual instances of these classes filling in specific slot value information
and additional slot restrictions.
Slots describe properties of classes and instances:
some
fundamental rules in ontology design
There
is no one correct way to model a domain— there are always viable alternatives. The
best solution almost always depends on the application that you have in mind and the
extensions that you anticipate.
2) Ontology
development is necessarily an iterative process.
3) Concepts
in the ontology should be close to objects (physical or logical) and relationships in your
domain of interest. These are most likely to be nouns (objects) or verbs (relationships)
in sentences that describe your domain.
how
detailed or general the ontology is going to be
what we are going to use the ontology for
concepts in the ontology must reflect this reality
We suggest starting the development of an ontology by defining its domain
and scope. That is, answer several basic questions:
�
What is the domain that the ontology will cover?
�
For what we are going to use
the ontology?
�
For what types of questions the information in the ontology should provide
answers?
�
Who will use and maintain the ontology?
plan to use
domain
If the people who will maintain
the ontology describe the domain in a language that is different from the language of the
ontology users, we may need to provide the mapping between the languages.
One of the ways to determine the scope of the ontology is to sketch a list
of questions that a knowledge base based on the ontology should be able to answer, competency questions
These competency questions are just a
sketch and do not need to be exhaustive.
Jonathan met them at Sensors Expo in Chicago. They have some interesting chemical sensors that can be used in agriculture and other applications. Jonathan was interested in them for lab-on-a-chip.
Sensorica mentioned at about 55 minutes mark (just after) - note that while many presenters not that interesting, Leif and Cliff at the beginning and again Leif and Cliff at the end made some interesting points, and in particular Leif Edvinsson very much in line with value networks thinking and alternative value flows - I think a fruitful interaction with Leif could result from inviting him into Sensorica