Skip to main content

Home/ Semantic Search Engines/ Group items tagged questions

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Filter: All | Bookmarks | Topics Simple Middle
Janos Haits

The START Natural Language Question Answering System - 1 views

start.csail.mit.edu

MIT NLP language tools ai search engine searchengine web3.0 semantic web semanticweb reference semantic search web 3.0 technology research

shared by Janos Haits on 17 Apr 11 - Cached
  • Janos Haits on 17 Apr 11
     
    START, the world's first Web-based question answering system, has been on-line and continuously operating since December, 1993. It has been developed by Boris Katz and his associates of the InfoLab Group at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory. Unlike information retrieval systems (e.g., search engines), START aims to supply users with "just the right information," instead of merely providing a list of hits. Currently, the system can answer millions of English questions about places (e.g., cities, countries, lakes, coordinates, weather, maps, demographics, political and economic systems), movies (e.g., titles, actors, directors), people (e.g., birth dates, biographies), dictionary definitions, and much, much more. Below is a list of some of the things START knows about, with example questions. You can type your question above or select from the following examples.
Janos Haits

Andi - Search for the next generation - 0 views

andisearch.com

control reference search searchengine metasearch tools search engine artificial intelligence com generation engine research Information online ai web3.0 Semantic Web semanticweb semantic

shared by Janos Haits on 20 Feb 23 - No Cached
  • Janos Haits on 20 Feb 23
     
    "Hello! I'm Andi, your smart search assistant. The more detailed your question, the better I can help
Seçkin Anıl Ünlü

Semantic Search: The Myth and Reality - ReadWriteWeb - 0 views

www.readwriteweb.com/...earch_the_myth_and_reality.php

semantic search readwriteweb web web3.0 comparison

shared by Seçkin Anıl Ünlü on 02 Nov 08 - Cached
  • Any technology that stands a chance to dethrone Google is of great interest to all of us, particularly one that takes advantage of long-awaited and much-hyped semantic technologies. But no matter how much progress has been made, most of us are still underwhelmed by the results. In head-to-head comparisons with Google, the results have not come out much different.
  • We all know that semantic technologies are powerful, but how and why?
  • The mistake is that semantic search engines present us with Google-like search box and allow us to enter free form queries. So we type the things that we are used to asking - primitive queries.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • The situation is made more difficult by the fact that right now there is only a thin range of problems where semantic search can clearly do better. This range is complex queries involving inferencing and reasoning over a complex data set.
  • Sadly, natural language processing gives little advantage when it comes to this category of problems.
  • Before looking at the problems that are perfect for semantic search, lets look at the hardest problems. These are computationally challenging problems that really have nothing to do with understanding semantics.
  • There are fundamental limits to what we can compute, and a class of problems that have an exponential number of possible solutions is not going to be magically solved because we represent data as RDF.
  • The good news is that there is a set of problems that are great for semantic search. These are the problems we have been solving so wonderfully with relational database.
  • At its most structured extreme we find Freebase - the semantic database of everything. Freebase is accessible via free text search, but more importantly via MQL (Metaweb Query Language).
  • Companies like Hakia and Powerset are probably working the hardest. These companies are trying to simultaneously build Freebase-like structures on the fly and then do natural language queries on top of them. The difference is that Hakia is using (likely similar) technology to query over the entire web, while Powerset has (probably shrewdly) chosen to restrict the search to Wikipedia.
  • Here is the problem - the natural language interface has nothing to do with the underlying data representation.
  • Fundamentally, Hakia, Powerset, and Freebase are databases. Fundamentally, all of them have some kind of Natural Language Processing that translates the question into a canonical query over the database.
  • Having a simplistic search interface hurts Powerset and Hakia, and to a lesser extent Freebase, which is not positioning itself as generic search.
  • Instead, the expectation should really be to solve the problems that can not be solved by Google today.
1 - 6 of 6
Showing 20▼ items per page