Group items tagged

Based out of Sydney, Australia, Exigo Tech is in the business of helping companies create robust IT infrastructure, develop intuitive applications, automate business processes and add value to their clients with digital transformation and business consulting. As a solution provider, Exigo Tech enables businesses to achieve high operational efficiency and enhanced productivity with their range of services in project management, cognitive solutions, Microsoft Dynamics and more. Exigo Tech is also recognised as one of the leading cloud service providers offering private cloud, public cloud and hybrid cloud solutions. Exigo Tech offers added agility to their customers via perfectly tailored disaster recovery solutions which is inclusive of managed services, backup, recovery and other security services. Exigo Tech provides app or application development services which augments the digital transformation journey for many of their clients.

Let's face it - with the proliferation of company "microsites," it's awfully hard to find an unbiased review of a product or service these days. The same goes for home security systems, as most of them are run by the alarm companies themselves. If you search for "best home security system" how do you know half the results aren't run by a giant alarm company (hint: they are)? Here at A Secure Life, it all began when our analyst's neighbor's house was broken into. Their neighborhood had become increasingly insecure, so we began our search for a solid alarm system provider. http://www.asecurelife.com/best-home-alarm-system

All S.W.S security systems are installed to insurance and police standard. We offer both wire free and hard wired systems will have the capability of being expanded should you extend or remote your premises, If you move premises we can move your existing alarm system also.

A great place to find Adware removal software

A coalition of security experts from more than 30 organizations is urging enterprises to exert more pressure on software vendors to ensure that they use secure code development practices. The group, led by the SANS Institute and Mitre Corp., offered enterprises recent hacks of Google draft contract language that would require vendors to adhere to a strict set of security standards for software development. In essence, the terms would make vendors liable for software defects that lead to security breaches. "Nearly every attack is enabled by [programming] mistakes that provide a handhold for attackers," said Alan Paller, director of research at SANS, a security training and certification group.

Of course, a more general way to address this and other "business" generated problems / abuses (like expensive required "arbitration" by companies owned and in bed with the companies requiring the arbitration!), is to FORBID contract elements that effectively strip any party of certain "rights" (like the right to sue for defectives; the right to freedom of speech; the right to warranty protections; the right to hold either party to public or published promises / representations, etc.). Basically, by making LYING and DECEIT and NEGLIGENCE liability and culpability unrestricted. Or will we hear / be told that being honest and producing a quality product is "anti-business"? What!? Is this like, if I can't lie and cheat being in business isn't worth it!? If that is true, then those parties and businesses could just as well "go away"! Just as "conservatives" say other criminals like that should. One may have argued that the software industry would never have "gotten off the ground" (at least, as fast as it did) if such strict liability had been enforced (as say, was eventually and is more often applied to physical building and their defects / collapses). That is, that the EULAs and contracts typically accompanying software ("not represented as fit for any purpose" more or less!) had been restricted. On the other hand, we might have gotten software somewhat slower but BETTER - NOT being associated with or causing the BILLIONS of dollars in losses due to bugs, security holes, etc. Others will rail that this will merely "make lawyers richer". So what if it will? As long as government isn't primarily "on the side" of the majority of the people (you know, like a "democracy" should be), then being able to get a individual "hired gun" is one of the only ways for the "little guy" to effectively defend themselves from corporate criminals and other "special interest" elites.