Islamic Intolerance - 0 views

• 
  #1 McCullough Lunde on 05 Jul 13

   

  Islamic apologists keep telling us the religion of Islam is a kind, tolerante and peaceful religion. Every time a girl is stoned or somebody is beheaded or a killing bomber blows up a coach or restaurant filled with innocent people, we're told that it's the task of Islamic fanatics and that genuine followers of Islam don't agree with these issues.
  
  Today we learn that in Afganistan, a place that's 99-year Muslim, a person has been attempted under Sharia (Islamic law) for apostasy, and if convicted, will experience the death penalty.
  
  What did this person do that was so terrible, so from the Islamic religion? He changed into Christianity, that is the horrible thing that he did. This is apparently one of the worst things a Muslim may do. He decided to stop trying the Islamic faith and for that reason is really evil that he deserves to be put to death. He might be spared, however, if he wants to become a Muslim again.
  
  The Hadith (which is considered the human body of quotes related to Muhammad), Sahih Bukhari Vol. 9, book 84, number 57, is interpreted as expressing 'Kill whoever changes his religion', hence the Sharia court judge is proposing to complete that.
  
  The Torah in Deuteronomy 13:6-10 continues to be interpreted as saying about apostastics 'But thou shalt certainly eliminate him; thine hand shall be first upon him to place him to death, and after ward the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the home of bondage.' yet I don't think that any Israeli judge would ever even consider trying to hand down any sort of criminal sentence for apostasy.
  
  If the Islamic faith is so kind, tolerant and peaceful, why are it is laws interpreted in such a barbaric and intolerant way by so many readers. I recognize that not all Muslim nations follow Sharia law and that of the that do, not all are so fanatical. But, many Muslim countries do still training amputation of one/both hand( s) for theft, stoning for adultery, and execution for apostasy. Other nations, including Iraq, that did not, in the past, follow Sharia law are now referring to setting up Sharia courts.
  
  I also recognize that not all Muslims interpret Islamic law exactly the same way. Islamic law-like any other human body of laws is at the mercy of interpretation and consequently could be interpreted liberally, averagely or fundamentally. Get supplementary resources on a related site by navigating to buy twitter folllowers. The problem is that while some Muslims interpret Islamic law liberally or averagely, it seems that a sizable majority of the Muslims in the Arabic world interpret the law fundamentally (at the very least as it concerns women and non believers).
  
  Afganistan's constitution guarentees freedom of religion, but, in an meeting, Afganistan's Foreign Minister explained that the government had 'nothing to accomplish' with all the court case. If you think you know anything at all, you will seemingly desire to research about consumers. He further said that he thought there would be a 'satisfactory result' to the case. In my experience, this seems that he was saying that the Sharia court isn't bound by Afgani law and can do as it pleases, thus making the Afgani structure worthless. It further contributes to the fact Afganistan is a democracy in writing only and is obviously dominated by Islamic fundamentalists. These fundamentalists might not be as bad while the Taliban but, thus far, they don't appear to be much better.
  
  There are numerous religious groups that think that apostasy is inappropriate and that their religion is the only true religion. But, I am aware of no nation, in this day and age, apart from a person that would be sentenced by certain Muslim countries, to death for changing his / her religious beliefs. My family friend discovered instagram followrrs by browsing newspapers. Such things did happen before, go through the Spanish inquisition, but are actually considered repugnant. To get other interpretations, people might need to have a glance at: buy more followers.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">Islamic apologists keep telling us the religion of Islam is a kind, tolerante and peaceful religion. Every time a girl is stoned or somebody is beheaded or a killing bomber blows up a coach or restaurant filled with innocent people, we're told that it's the task of Islamic fanatics and that genuine followers of Islam don't agree with these issues. <br /> <br /> Today we learn that in Afganistan, a place that's 99-year Muslim, a person has been attempted under Sharia (Islamic law) for apostasy, and if convicted, will experience the death penalty. <br /> <br /> What did this person do that was so terrible, so from the Islamic religion? He changed into Christianity, that is the horrible thing that he did. This is apparently one of the worst things a Muslim may do. He decided to stop trying the Islamic faith and for that reason is really evil that he deserves to be put to death. He might be spared, however, if he wants to become a Muslim again. <br /> <br /> The Hadith (which is considered the human body of quotes related to Muhammad), Sahih Bukhari Vol. 9, book 84, number 57, is interpreted as expressing 'Kill whoever changes his religion', hence the Sharia court judge is proposing to complete that. <br /> <br /> The Torah in Deuteronomy 13:6-10 continues to be interpreted as saying about apostastics 'But thou shalt certainly eliminate him; thine hand shall be first upon him to place him to death, and after ward the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to thrust thee away from the LORD thy God, which brought thee out of the land of Egypt, from the home of bondage.' yet I don't think that any Israeli judge would ever even consider trying to hand down any sort of criminal sentence for apostasy. <br /> <br /> If the Islamic faith is so kind, tolerant and peaceful, why are it is laws interpreted in such a barbaric and intolerant way by so many readers. I recognize that not all Muslim nations follow Sharia law and that of the that do, not all are so fanatical. But, many Muslim countries do still training amputation of one/both hand( s) for theft, stoning for adultery, and execution for apostasy. Other nations, including Iraq, that did not, in the past, follow Sharia law are now referring to setting up Sharia courts. <br /> <br /> I also recognize that not all Muslims interpret Islamic law exactly the same way. Islamic law-like any other human body of laws is at the mercy of interpretation and consequently could be interpreted liberally, averagely or fundamentally. Get supplementary resources on a related site by navigating to <a rel="nofollow" href="http://hottwitterfollowers.com/">buy twitter folllowers</a>. The problem is that while some Muslims interpret Islamic law liberally or averagely, it seems that a sizable majority of the Muslims in the Arabic world interpret the law fundamentally (at the very least as it concerns women and non believers). <br /> <br /> Afganistan's constitution guarentees freedom of religion, but, in an meeting, Afganistan's Foreign Minister explained that the government had 'nothing to accomplish' with all the court case. If you think you know anything at all, you will seemingly desire to research about <a rel="nofollow" href="http://hottwitterfollowers.com/">consumers</a>. He further said that he thought there would be a 'satisfactory result' to the case. In my experience, this seems that he was saying that the Sharia court isn't bound by Afgani law and can do as it pleases, thus making the Afgani structure worthless. It further contributes to the fact Afganistan is a democracy in writing only and is obviously dominated by Islamic fundamentalists. These fundamentalists might not be as bad while the Taliban but, thus far, they don't appear to be much better. <br /> <br /> There are numerous religious groups that think that apostasy is inappropriate and that their religion is the only true religion. But, I am aware of no nation, in this day and age, apart from a person that would be sentenced by certain Muslim countries, to death for changing his / her religious beliefs. My family friend discovered <a rel="nofollow" href="http://hottwitterfollowers.com/">instagram followrrs</a> by browsing newspapers. Such things did happen before, go through the Spanish inquisition, but are actually considered repugnant. To get other interpretations, people might need to have a glance at: <a rel="nofollow" href="http://hottwitterfollowers.com/">buy more followers</a>.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top