King Philip's War: Colonial Expansion, Native Resistance, and The End of Indian Sovereignty - 5 views

• 
  #1 jacksonm465 pds on 28 Apr 11

   

  "The two people also had very different contexts for and understandings of this agreement. The English saw it as a formal treaty that, as in the European tradition of diplomacy, bound by signatories, their successors, and their peoples in perpetuity. Massasoit did not speak English, and Native Americans had no experience with written treaties…" (David R. Mandell pg. 2)
  The John Hopkins University Press (2010)

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">"The two people also had very different contexts for and understandings of this agreement. The English saw it as a formal treaty that, as in the European tradition of diplomacy, bound by signatories, their successors, and their peoples in perpetuity. Massasoit did not speak English, and Native Americans had no experience with written treaties…" (David R. Mandell pg. 2) <br /> The John Hopkins University Press (2010)</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top