Skip to main content

Home/ Public Philosophy/ Group items tagged academic

Rss Feed Group items tagged

André de Avillez

Why Liberal Academics and Ivory Tower Radicals Make Poor Revolutionaries - Youngist - 1 views

  •  
    "Try reading any academic text from your local women's studies, ethnic studies, post-colonial studies, or anthropology department. The texts are almost always written so that only academics can understand. Some students and scholars call it "acadamese." It is writing that needs to be decoded before it can be understood. This is what inaccessible language looks like in academic texts written about oppressed groups, but not for them."
  •  
    This strikes me as the kind of article we ought to invite for commenting, review, and publication. If this could be improved without devolving into "academese" (as she calls it), it would be a great article.
André de Avillez

The Work of Public Work | Jacobin - 2 views

  • At the same time, I want to hold Robin accountable to his desire for a “materialist analysis of the relationship between politics, economics, and culture.”
  • I think he wrongly characterizes the conditions under which many of these young academics are writing
  • The risk of being a public intellectual, he posits, comes from the fact that these scholars are taking time away from their academic writing
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • The workload of academics has increased exponentially in recent years, as has been well-documented
  • I have found that writing for popular audiences is not solely an internal passion, but has actually become an external demand of young scholars, another metric by which their job application or tenure-file is evaluated.
  • The problem is that Robin goes on to romanticize the lives of young scholar-writers, saying that their work arises from intrinsic desires, whose realization is made possible by new technology:
  • Young scholars are compelled to transform themselves into academic entrepreneurs, creating a brand that they promote through their blogs, tweets, and online profiles.
  • The swelling workloads of academics are indicative of the micropolitics of neoliberalism
  • The mantra of “publishing early and often” has intensified, especially in a tight job market. As tenured horizons grow grimmer, new scholars must do anything they can to stand out above a crowd of over-achievers. Publish early, publish often — and now, publish online.
  • Consider the website Academia.edu
  • But the site also exemplifies the quantification of the productive self, with each profile displaying the number of views, article downloads, and followers for each academic.
  • It’s no wonder that I’ve also seen a growing number of colleagues (myself included) add a “Public Scholarship” section to their CVs
  • The labor of public intellectualism is more than a political project, or even a charitable effort of self-expression — it’s another manifestation of exploitation
  • As a result, young academics trying to keep up with new media are writing, reading blogs and engaging in Twitter wars during lunch breaks, between teaching commitments, and well into the night.
  • To meet the demands of academic capitalism, there’s now even less of a chance of ever clocking out.
  • Yes, let us praise the young writers whose voices are being seen and heard across the blogosphere, and luxuriate in the possibilities of transcending the borders of the Ivory Tower. But let us not forget that writing, even on the Internet, and even for the “public good,” is still work. And whenever we’re encouraged to do more work, we should be a bit wary.
  •  
    A response to Corey Robin's response to Kristof's article, raising troubling concerns regarding the commodification of public scholarship.  Seems worth amplifying, in conjunction with the critiques of Kristof's piece or on its own.
André de Avillez

Not the Answer - An Academic Carefully Assesses the Arguments for Open Access | The Sch... - 1 views

  • One of the forms of open access . . . consists in the creation and use of repositories for research writing: databases, typically run by university libraries, into which ‘pre-prints’ (basically, manuscripts) of journal articles may be uploaded for free download by anyone with access to the internet. This has recently become known as ‘green’ open access
    • André de Avillez
       
      definition of "Green OA"
  • gold’ open access, which keeps journals open by moving the burden of payment from the reader to the writer
  • ...8 more annotations...
  • t represents a further drain on university budgets (since repositories are not free to run)
    • André de Avillez
       
      definition of "Gold OA"
  • OA advocates tend to conflate problems (e.g., library access with subscription prices with domain expertise with taxpayer status), which makes each problem harder to solve or address in a practical way
  • Gold OA will likely only work for academics at the richest institutions, creating closed access further upstream
  • Authors are not producing work for publishers, but for other academics;
  • ublishers are in fact paid labor for academics, who are the ultimate consumers
  • Careers in publishing are getting harder, especially in editorial roles, which is leading to fewer young professionals pursuing these paths, bad news for the future of high-quality scientific communication
  • the pay-to-say system was devised in order to permit elite academics to continue publishing in the manner to which they had become accustomed, they will be under no obligation to write in a manner more accessible to an audience of non-specialists, and their publishers will be paid in advance even if no-one ever so much as downloads the articles they turn out.
  •  
    A reply to Daniel Allington's concerns with open access, including a conversation with Allington in the comments section
André de Avillez

On "community" and "academic" | poke salad - 0 views

  •  
    Blog post on the potential difficulties of reconciling an academic identity with the concept of community
Mark Fisher

Risk and Ethics in Public Scholarship | Inside Higher Ed - 1 views

  • Doing academia in public view is both a powerful tool and a potentially powerful weapon.
  • There is no buffer in public writing.
  • And for many readers the allure of attacking the writer instead of the work is too seductive to deny. That can be a shock when you are accustomed to the civil discourse, no matter how thin or banal, that governs academic critique.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • While universities are quick to promote public scholarship they are loath to extend their responsibility to include refereeing the behavior of academics in the public sphere.
  • As my friend discovered, there is no ethic guiding public scholarship
  • The inequalities women and minorities face in traditional academic models only exacerbates the potential risks of contributing to public scholarship.
  • That is potentially devastating to those who would benefit most from the kind of visibility, credibility, and network building that public scholarship can provide.
  •  
    Description of some of the issues we need to address under the idea of a 'safe space'. Contrast between academia and publicness that is relevant to the normative policies of PSD 
André de Avillez

Professors, We Need You! - NYTimes.com - 1 views

  •  
    Op-ed on the disjunct between academics and their communities
André de Avillez

Look Who Nick Kristof's Saving Now | Corey Robin - 1 views

  • You begin to get a clue of what he’s really talking about, then, by noticing two of the people he approvingly cites and quotes in his critique of academia: Anne-Marie Slaughter and Jill Lepore.
  • The problem here is not that scholars don’t aspire to write for The New Yorker. It’s that it’s a rather selective place
  • He only reads The New Yorker, and then complains that everyone doesn’t write for The New Yorker
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • Nor does he see the gatekeepers—even in our new age of blogs and little magazines—that prevent supply from meeting demand.
  • The problem here isn’t that typically American conceit of “culture” v. nonconformist rebel. It’s the very material pressures and constraints young academics face, long before tenure. It’s the job market.  It’s the rise of adjuncts. It’s neoliberalism.
  • I had to smile at Kristof’s nod to publish or perish. Most working academics would give anything to be confronted with that dilemma. The vast majority can’t even think of publishing; they’re too busy teaching four, five, courses a semester
  •  
    A reply to Nicholas Kristof
Kris Klotz

The Point is Academic (Guest Post by Andrew Seal) | s-usih.org - 1 views

  •  
    Reply to Kristof
André de Avillez

Who's Afraid of Peer Review? - 2 views

  • Acceptance was the norm, not the exception
  • accepted by journals hosted by industry titans Sage and Elsevier
  • by journals published by prestigious academic institutions such as Kobe University in Japan.
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • by scholarly society journal
  • ven accepted by journals for which the paper's topic was utterly inappropriate,
  • Some open-access journals that have been criticized for poor quality control provided the most rigorous peer review of all.
  • Science. ISSN 0036-8075 (print), 1095-9203 (online)
  • The Who's Who of credible open-access journals is the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • There is another list—one that journals fear. It is curated by Jeffrey Beall, a library scientist at the University of Colorado, Denver. His list is a single page on the Internet that names and shames what he calls "predatory" publishers
  • one in five of Beall's "predatory" publishers had managed to get at least one of their journals into the DOAJ
  • Some say that the open-access model itself is not to blame for the poor quality control revealed by Science's investigation.
  • But open access has multiplied that underclass of journals, and the number of papers they publish. "Everyone agrees that open-access is a good thing," Roos says. "The question is how to achieve it."
  • The most basic obligation of a scientific journal is to perform peer review
Mark Fisher

Reports and References - Public Scholarship Committee, - 1 views

  • Defining Public Scholarship Any definition of public scholarship must balance both the Universitys obligation to establish and maintain reciprocal relations with communities, service providing agencies, industries, and civic organizations in Minnesota and the world with the Universitys core commitments to academic freedom and basic research and cutting-edge scholarship and creation.
  • Defining Public Scholarship. At the level of the institution, public scholarship means optimizing the extent to which University research informs and is informed by the public good, maximizes the generation and transfer of knowledge and technology, educates the public about what research the University does, and listens to the public about what research needs to be done. This scholarship contributes to the intellectual and social capital of the University and the State (and larger regions), and includes (but is not limited to) the transfer of knowledge and technology that contributes to improved quality of life for significant portions of the populous.
  •  
    Defining Public Scholarship
Mark Fisher

Journal of Public Scholarship in Higher Education - Missouri State University - 2 views

  • While there is variation in current terminology (public scholarship, scholarship of engagement, community-engaged scholarship), engaged scholarship is defined by the collaboration between academics and individuals outside the academy - knowledge professionals and the lay public (local, regional/state, national, global) - for the mutually beneficial exchange of knowledge and resources in a context of partnership and reciprocity.                                                                                                                                            (NERCHE, n.d.)
  • The Journal of Public Scholarship in Higher Education aims to advance the status and prospects for publicly engaged teaching and research in the academy by showcasing the new disciplinary and/or pedagogical knowledge generated by engagement with the community.
  •  
    Another articulation of Public Scholarship Journal to look at List of potential allies of PPJ in Editorial Board
Mark Fisher

Public Scholarship: An Academic Definition - Engaged Public Scholarship - 1 views

  • My conception of public scholarship is rooted in critical and culturally responsive pedagogy, which is embodied in my manuscript on “Hip-Hop Epistemology and Culturally Responsive Science Teaching”.   I want to engage publics in critical thinking and the active critique of what is popular and what is powerful. 
  •  
    Maurice E. Dolberry Conception of Public Scholarship
André de Avillez

Art and Truth after Plato // Reviews // Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews // University ... - 4 views

  • The purpose of this book, we are told right at the start, is to address anew 'the old question, often neglected in contemporary aesthetic debates, about art and truth, or art and cognition' (p. 1)
  • His purpose is to survey these varied responses, trace their development and adjudicate among them
  • very widely, and considers many writers who get scant attention nowadays
  • ...23 more annotations...
  • His opening chapter sets out Plato's contentions about art and truth
    • Chris Long
       
      Summary points here seem fair.
  • In any event, though the chapter on 'Christian Platonic and Anti-Platonic Art' is not noticeably shorter than the others, it does not have a key role in the philosophical trajectory that Rockmore is tracing.
    • Chris Long
       
      Critical comment, but fairly stated, not harsh, matter of fact.
  • very widely, and considers many writers who get scant attention nowadays
    • Chris Long
       
      Not clear if these are positive or negative points, but the focus on those who receive scant attention point seems positive.
    • Chris Long
       
      Identifies aims - good, but relies on direct quotation - bad.
  • rather long and unusual excursion through Marxist aesthetics.
    • Chris Long
       
      There is implicit judgement here, and no imagination about why Rockmore might be taking this approach. More generosity needed here.
  • This is a hugely ambitious book, and the range of reading that has gone into its making cannot but be impressive, though the steady flow of many lengthy summaries and brief references to a huge number of writers makes for rather heavy going on the part of the reader.
    • Chris Long
       
      Praise, tempered by a sort of critique here. As if a simply positive remark can't stand on its own. Also, the vocabulary is one of coercion "cannot but be impressive."
  • more importantly flawed, and in a number of critical ways
    • Chris Long
       
      OK, but is this the best way to say this?
  • No real evidence is offered of this neglect, and indeed the book is remarkable for making virtually no reference to contemporary work in aesthetics.
    • Chris Long
       
      Fair point about references, but fine. Then belittling language "even the briefest survey would show..." - shame tactic.
  • Rockmore might object
    • Chris Long
       
      Indication that the reviewer is imagining his way into the mind of the author - imagine a response. Good.
  • Viewed in this light, however, it does not come out very well.
    • Chris Long
       
      So simple positive comments are avoided, but simple negative ones are not. Then ...  "conspicuous failures."
  • (to my mind)
    • Chris Long
       
      Recognizes own position might be limited.
  • serious methodological weaknesses that undermine some of its claims.
    • Chris Long
       
      Negative comment, not nasty, but not nicely put.
  • what most people recognize to be a caricature
    • Chris Long
       
      Appeal to "most people" is a failure to take ownership of own critique.
  • It is no pleasure to give a serious and substantial philosophical work such a low rating. So on the positive side I think it can safely be said that readers will undoubtedly benefit from Rockmore's range of reference.
    • Chris Long
       
      Begrudging critique, but limited praise.
    • André de Avillez
       
      Overview of target project.  Seems like one the author would endorse, but it's impossible to know without asking the author, and difficult to guess without having read the work being reviewed.
  • hat 'long ago'
    • André de Avillez
       
      Derisive tone
  • story
    • André de Avillez
       
      Referring to the content of the book as a story rather than as a historical overview implies that the work lacks academic legitimacy
  • 'Middle Ages'
    • André de Avillez
       
      The use of scare quotes here, and the qualifiers that follow, imply a veiled criticism. It seems that criticisms must be open in order to be collegial, for otherwise they imply that the target's author is too dimwitted to grasp a meaning which is plainly grasped by the reviewer and the audience.
  • even the briefest survey would show, I think, that 'aesthetic cognitivism', as it is increasingly referred to, is not only widely discussed, but alive and wel
    • André de Avillez
       
      Very critical language, framing a serious critique.  Yet it seems that the obvious has not been stated: the author was too focused on the continental tradition, and the reviewer was largely unfamiliar with that tradition (so much so that he saw the "excursion" into marxist aesthetics as unusual)
  • For example, he uses the expressions 'art and truth' and 'art and cognition' more or less interchangeably. But the conflation of 'truth' and 'cognition' confounds many of the issues he want to discuss, because there are important dimensions to cognition other than truth
    • André de Avillez
       
      Criticism of the target, attempted at the target's own terms.
  • with which contemporary aesthetics is concerned.
    • André de Avillez
       
      One has to worry here of how the discipline is being defined.  Does analytic philosophy have dominance over the field?
  • In doing so he ranges very widely, and considers many writers who get scant attention nowadays, devoting a whole chapter to 'Marx, Marxism, and Aesthetic Realism', for instance.
    • André de Avillez
       
      Praise for target of review
  • n any event, though the chapter on 'Christian Platonic and Anti-Platonic Art' is not noticeably shorter than the others, it does not have a key role in the philosophical trajectory that Rockmore is tracing.
    • André de Avillez
       
      Implies that the chapter is unnecessary, and does not attempt to see why it would have been left in.  Even if a philosophical aesthetics is not present in this long period, the author may have chosen to discuss it for the sake of completeness, and to show to what extent a philosophy of art/ aesthetics existed in the middle ages.
  •  
    A negative review which labors to see the merits in the target
1 - 15 of 15
Showing 20 items per page