For your information, the Westminster Assembly condemned those who understood the Song of Songs as “a hot carnal pamphlet formed by some loose Apollo or Cupid”. Moreover, John Wesley found the literal reading repulsive. And, after reading Longman’s commentary on the Song of Songs, I felt like it was a complete waste of time. Indeed, some of his own interpretations seemed to me to be far more “allegorical” than the stuff I’ve read from Beza and the Puritans!