Group items tagged

"The Indian Army will start DNA profiling of its soldiers this year for their identification in case of mutilation of bodies during an operation, attack or any kind of mishap. "We will begin DNA profiling of soldiers from this year as the profiling centre and data bank are almost ready," Lieutenant General Naresh Kumar, Commandant of Army Hospital Research and Referral, told PTI. Being set up at the Department of Forensic Medicine in Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, the centre will collect the blood samples of the troops who are involved in hazardous tasks, including fighting militancy, and store them in a DNA data bank. The DNA profiling centre is being established to help in identification of bodies mutilated beyond recognition. "Now that this centre and DNA data bank are almost ready to take off, we will be able to easily recognise the mutilated dead bodies that we get during war time, from an episode of avalanches or from blast sites." "

In a setback to veteran Congress leader and former governor of Andhra Pradesh N D Tiwari, the Supreme Court on Monday held that he has to undergo DNA test in a paternity case. However, it maintained that the test findings would not be made public until it is required to do so. A Bench comprising Justices Aftab Alam and R M Lodha refused to stay the Delhi High Court order asking the 85-year-old leader to undergo DNA test and directed him to suggest by Friday the procedure preferred by him for the DNA test. Tiwari who has held the post of chief minister of undivided Uttar Pradesh and later of Uttarakhand contended that it would be a violation of his Right to Privacy and would cause him public humiliation if he is directed to undergo the DNA test.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday made it clear that it cannot give direction to make DNA profiling mandatory in the country, for unidentified bodies. Instead it left the issue to the Centre, observing that it is for the government to explore whether magistrates can be empowered to order DNA profiling. The bench comprising Chief Justice S H Kapadia and Justices K S Radhakrishnan and Swatanter Kumar said it cannot give any direction but asked the government to consider the issue if there's any possibility of asking magistrate courts to order such profiling, which will help families to claim unidentified bodies. "You file an affidavit whether a circular can be issued to state governments for asking magistrates to order DNA profiling of unidentified bodies," the Bench said as it asked Additional Solicitor General P P Malhotra to inform the court within four weeks. In an earlier hearing, on November 16, 2009, the bench was not keen on issuing notice to the Centre on a PIL filed by a Haryana-based doctor Shamsher Malik, who sought a direction to the government for making DNA profiling of unidentified bodies mandatory.

The packed courtroom waited, but N.D. Tiwari didn't come. Despite a high court order, the Congress veteran didn't turn up to give his blood sample for a DNA test to ascertain whether Rohit Shekhar, a 31-year-old lawyer, is his biological son. Rohit and his mother Ujjawala were present in court today with a doctor who had come to take Tiwari's blood sample. Tiwari's lawyer Bahar Barqui moved an application before joint registrar Deepak Garg, saying Indian and international laws were clear that no individual could be "forced" to give DNA sample.

The law ministry is working on a proposal to make right to privacy a fundamental right in the Indian Constitution. The right to privacy would include the right to confidentiality of communication, confidentiality of private or family life, protection of his honour and good name, protection from search, detention or exposure of lawful communication between individuals, privacy from surveillance, confidentiality of banking, financial, medical and legal information, protection from identity theft of various kinds, protection of use of a person's photographs, fingerprints, DNA samples and other samples taken at police stations and other places and protection of data relating to individual.

The Supreme Court today said it will hold final hearing on a day-to-day basis from April 19 on Tata Group chairman Ratan Tata's plea to bar online portals and electronic media from airing his phone conversation with corporate lobbyist Nira Radia tapped by the income tax department. A bench of Justice GS Singhvi and Justice AK Ganguly will examine the issues raised by Tata including the questions of right to privacy and right to freedom of speech and expression as envisaged under the Constitution.

"But an interaction on Friday between the city's top cops and citizens of Jayanagar, JP Nagar, Basavanagudi, Subramanyapura, Chamarajpet, Banashankari, Girinagar, KS Layout and adjoining areas in South Division police jurisdiction saw police commissioner, BG Jyothi Prakash Mirji, appealing to the residents to appoint watchmen and set up CCTVs to increase vigil on the streets - which is otherwise a policeman's role. And all this, through expenses borne by the residents who anyway pay taxes expecting those very policing services for their protection in return. "If people do this, and join hands with the police to decrease crime, then we can achieve it," Mirji said."