What makes the Anthony Weiner story somewhat unique and thus worth discussing for a moment is that, as Hendrik Hertzberg points out, the pretense of substantive relevance (which, lame though it was in prior scandals, was at least maintained) has been more or less brazenly dispensed with here. This isn't a case of illegal sex activity or gross hypocrisy (i.e., David Vitter, Larry Craig, Mark Foley (who built their careers on Family Values) or Eliot Spitzer (who viciously prosecuted trivial prostitution cases)). There's no lying under oath (Clinton) or allegedly illegal payments (Ensign, Edwards). From what is known, none of the women claim harassment and Weiner didn't even have actual sex with any of them. This is just pure mucking around in the private, consensual, unquestionably legal private sexual affairs of someone for partisan gain, voyeuristic fun and the soothing fulfillment of judgmental condemnation. And in that regard, it sets a new standard: the private sexual activities of public figures -- down to the most intimate details -- are now inherently newsworthy, without the need for any pretense of other relevance.
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or url
1More
Mark Steel: If every Boston marathon runner had a gun, they'd be safe, right? - Comment... - 0 views
GUEST BLOG: Rex Widerstrom - Thirteen things you (probably) didn't know about... - 0 views
Mark Levin: Fiscal cliff? We're facing the COLLAPSE of our society and Republ... - 0 views
2More
Mark Green: 7 Days in America: Will McCain Put Reputation First at Wednesday's Debate? ... - 0 views
1More
Mark Kleiman: Changing the topic - Politics on The Huffington Post - 0 views
1More
Senators Pryor, Kerry Propose Equal Internet Access For Disabled - 0 views
1More
Young Protesters Revolt in Yemeni Capital - 0 views
1More