Skip to main content

Home/ Politically Minded/ Group items tagged epa

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Joe La Fleur

Greenpeace Goes After Apple Over 'Dirty Coal' | EPA Abuse - 0 views

  •  
    Their figures do not include the co2 that people and other anamals breath out..IE: They are lieing, a progressives favorite pass time. Don't these guys have jobs? Actually they are living off of government grants....ain't that a hoot?
Joe La Fleur

The Big Flush (In Wisconsin) | EPA Abuse - 0 views

  •  
    DEMOCRATS AGAINST MINING AND JOBS
Joe La Fleur

EPA to kill new coal-fired plants through first-ever greenhouse-gas regulatio... - 0 views

  •  
    OBAMAS WAR ON ENERGY, DRIVING UP COSTS ON PURPOSE
Joe La Fleur

A Refresher on ClimateGate | EPA Abuse - 0 views

  •  
    ON THEIR OWN WORDS, LIES ABOUT CLIMATE CHANGE
rich hilts

First the FCC, Now the EPA Overreaches - 1 views

  •  
    ou guessed it. We've been waiting for this. Here comes King Kamehobama, down from his throne to bestow his munificence upon his subjects. He knows better. He knows the globe is warming with record cooling - it's a gut feeling you see.
Skeptical Debunker

NYT: Many polluters escape prosecution - The New York Times- msnbc.com - 0 views

  • Thousands of the nation’s largest water polluters are outside the Clean Water Act’s reach because the Supreme Court has left uncertain which waterways are protected by that law, according to interviews with regulators. As a result, some businesses are declaring that the law no longer applies to them. And pollution rates are rising. Companies that have spilled oil, carcinogens and dangerous bacteria into lakes, rivers and other waters are not being prosecuted, according to Environmental Protection Agency regulators working on those cases, who estimate that more than 1,500 major pollution investigations have been discontinued or shelved in the last four years. Story continues below ↓advertisement | your ad heredap('&PG=NBCMSN&AP=1089','300','250');The Clean Water Act was intended to end dangerous water pollution by regulating every major polluter. But today, regulators may be unable to prosecute as many as half of the nation’s largest known polluters because officials lack jurisdiction or because proving jurisdiction would be overwhelmingly difficult or time consuming, according to midlevel officials.
  •  
    The best "justice" money can buy via packing the Supreme Court with "conservatives" is bearing smelly, polluted fruit. Specifically, those "conservatives" are showing themselves to be "activist judges" in "watering down" conservation and public safety laws passed by Congress. Polluting "business" entities are apparently NOT to be considered to be within the oft-quoted and loved "conservative" limitation of the purview of the federal government to merely protect the populace from "enemies foreign and domestic". That this pollution kills and injures thousands (and poisons the environment for the countless of the "unborn") apparently doesn't matter (but if Al Qaeda was doing it, then complete suspension of all domestic rights would be justified to "fight" that!). Pictured: In 2007, a pipe maker was fined millions of dollars for dumping oil, lead and zinc into Avondale Creek in Alabama. A court ruled the waterway was exempt from the Clean Water Act. The firm eventually settled by agreeing to pay a smaller amount and submit to probation.
thinkahol *

A GOP assault on environmental regulations - latimes.com - 0 views

  •  
    Republicans, though correct that environmental regulations cost money, are oblivious to the public health consequences of pollution and the economic costs of inaction.
‹ Previous 21 - 36 of 36
Showing 20 items per page