Skip to main content

Home/ Philosophy for teens/ Group items tagged animal

Rss Feed Group items tagged

steven bloom

Using Animals for Testing: Pro's Versus Con's - About Animal Testing (UK) - 1 views

  • ssible by
  • It is for this reason that animal testing is considered vital for improving human health and it is also why the scientific community a
  • nd many members of the public support its use. In fact, there are also individuals who are against animal testing
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • for cosmetics but still support animal testing for medicine and the development of new drugs for disease.
  • Another important aspect to note is that animal testing helps to ensure the safety of drugs and many other substances humans use or are exposed to regularly. Drugs in particular can carry significant dangers with their use but animal testing allows researchers to initially gauge the safety of drugs prior to commencing trials on humans. This means that human harm is reduced and human lives are saved - not simply from avoidance of the dangers of drugs but because the drugs themselves save lives as well as improve the quality of human life.
  • osest match and
  • best one with regards to applying this data to humans.
  •  
    Please add your sticky note summary.
  •  
    Thia website states the cons of animal testing. It says that when animals are finished being tested on they are usually killed. It also states that the cost of animal testing is through the roof and we can spend it on anything else. Lastly soem scientist still believe that it is unreliable to test animals and to think that the drug will work on humans.
Kelsey Adams

The Animal Rights View - 2 views

  • The capacity for suffering is a prerequisite for having interests at all, a condition that must be met before we can speak of rights.
  • In both the historic and modern views of animal rights, the key point is "sentience," or the capacity to experience pain or pleasur
  • In the animal rights view, if a being is capable of suffering, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • They don't have to speak a word. Screaming, writhing about, crying and other behavior tells us they are in pain. We see the same sort of behavior in animals.
  •  
    This website gives us the utilitarian point of view on how animal cruelty and their use as resource is continuously horrid. Jeremy Bentham said that as long as a being is capable of suffering, then there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. He said that the question is not can animals reason but do animals suffer?
  •  
    Highlight an important part(s) of the website for your team to read.
  •  
    What affects us the most in our society: Suffering of a infant or the suffering of an animal? Obviously, we would rather an animal suffer opposed to an infant. If someone has to suffer, it should be animals because it the extreme is outrageous.
Kelsey Adams

The Case for Animal Rights by Tom Regan - 2 views

  •  
    This is an actual case which demonstrated the various points as to why the use of animals as a resource is wrong. Tom Reagan explains that the people who are against the right of animals believe that their only purpose in our world is to be eaten, surgically manipulated and to be exploited for sport or money. It even sounds awful to say such a thing.
  • ...2 more comments...
  •  
    Where is this from? This is a file on the web but who publishes it and who is Tom Regan?
  •  
    Tom Regan is an American philosopher who specializes in animal rights theory. He teaches at North Carolina State University. He is the author of numerous books on the philosophy of animal rights, including The Case for Animal Rights. His studies, books and cases have significantly influenced the modern animal liberation movement.
  •  
    I was not able to sticky note the page but here are some parts i would have highlighted: Singer and Frey both offer arguments that are motivated by utilitarian concerns Regan offers his own Rights View as an adequate moral theory: to respect the rights of an individual is to treat that individual as if she was inherently valuable rather than merely useful (improvement on utilitarianism) Nothing less than the abolition of using animals as food, in science, and in industry is morally acceptable according to Regan
steven bloom

Why Animal Rights? | PETA.org - 1 views

  •  
    This website talks about why animals should have rights. The main idea is by the philosopher Jeremy Bentam who founded teh untilinariam school. He says when making a being right we do not consider if they can reason or talk we consider if they can sufffer. For animals the answer if yes thus we should have animal rights
  •  
    Please highlight relevant parts of the site.
Kelsey Adams

U.S. Animal Death Statistics (Farmed Animals) | HumaneSpot.org - 1 views

  • This report estimates that 10,378 million land animals will be killed for food in 2007, including 39 million cows, 121 million pigs, 4 million sheep and goats, 10 million rabbits, 317 million turkeys, 28 million ducks, 9 billion "broilers" chickens and 450 million "layer" hens
  •  
    This site gives us an approximation of how many farm animals are killed each year for food. According to the website (http://hubpages.com/hub/Fur-Farms-Torture-Chambers-and-Slaughter-Houses) over 31 million animals are killed each year in farm factories (abusive factories).
  •  
    This website has restricted access and I don't recommend it.
Matthew Schaffer

The ideas of Karma and Fate. A "free will inviolability" as a fundamental law of Creation - 0 views

  • mistakes a man has committed in his life may allegedly throw him back, and he may reincarnate as an animal.
    • Matthew Schaffer
       
      Believing that if we do bad things in our life may make us re-birth as an animal is very interesting? I don't see here why to them being an animal is so bad. What does the animal symbolize to them?
  • If something is going on in this world, it means that some system stands necessarily behind this,
    • Matthew Schaffer
       
      Here they are saying, in simpler terms, that everything has a force. Everything that happens in the world is made by some "system" which is behind it. So, this is saying that things can and will happen no matter what, confirming their belief in fate. 
  • a man has to know his mistakes for himself
    • Matthew Schaffer
       
      It begins to talk about Karma here, however this was not the assignment it is still interesting. What they say about Karma is that man needs to be aware of the mistakes that they have made and try to fix it, and then move on. 
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • The fate is a possibility to choose freely your own Past and your own Future.
    • Matthew Schaffer
       
      The Easterners definition of Fate is the possibility to choose your own past, and your own future. This meaning that in a way, man can choose and create their own fate. I agree with this, because after what they said about Karma, it is clear to me that they believe that everything is because of man. 
  • a possibility of this free choice of his own fate is not always available because of karma of all the civilization.
    • Matthew Schaffer
       
      Here they say that Fate may not always be possible. I think because someone may want a certain fate, but because of their strong belief in Karma, Karma will get in the way of their Fate
Kelsey Adams

Visual of how many animals are killed per year under cruel measures - 1 views

  •  
    This website gives an amazing visual as to how many animals are killed per year using awful and inhumane measures.
  •  
    Stay away from the sensational, as tempting as it seems, and build RATIONAL arguments.
  •  
    Why do you want or even need visual? That will not help build any rational arugment.
vince chatigny-barbosa

Animals lack free moral judgment - 1 views

  •  
    This is a website basically supporting the argument that animals lack the free moral judgment and basically cannot exercise any rights.
  •  
    "However closely humans and lower animals resemble each other, human beings alone possess the capacity for free choice and the responsibility to act ethically." This is a quote from the site you bookmarked that I find is part of a good point and a good argument. You really chose a good site because it holds philosophical points instead of only opinions and facts. It doesn't really leave much room for argument, but you might want to watch out for your opponents saying things like, "Who's to say they don't have ratinoal thought?" It's sure to help you out in your debate, though.
anonymous

Can Testing Animals Be Justified? - 1 views

  •  
    Points on For vs. Against testing animals.
  •  
    This site is better than the last one but you need to highlight the important parts. Just bookmarking is not enough.
vince chatigny-barbosa

Why animals have no rights - 0 views

  •  
    Great video with a strong argument on why animals have no rights.
vince chatigny-barbosa

Why animals have no rights - 0 views

  •  
    This text ultimately boils down to the fact that animals have no capacity of free moral judgement. Therefore, they exercise no rights.
anonymous

Animal Abuse. Utilitarianism Point Of View - 1 views

  •  
    Interesting philosophical study on Animals Don't Have Rights.
  •  
    Please give more information in your summary. This is a 15page PDF file. You need to give your team some help on what to read; otherwise, don't post files like this.
Daryl Bambic

Aristotle and the Good Life - 0 views

  • But it doesn’t follow that since his ideas on some things were silly, his ideas on all things were silly
  • reason a central place in human life
  • Money is clearly only a means to an end, therefore it can’t be the main good
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • But what really determines the quality of our lives is not our circumstances themselves but what we make of them
  • Success (or honour) can’t be the main good either, since (a) it’s too dependent on other people and the whims of fortune,
  • Pleasure is certainly not the main good,
  • lives that are fit only for cattle
  • He recognises three types of relationships: the useful, the pleasant and the ones based on mutual admiration.
  • main good for a human being is reason, since it is the characteristic human capacity, the one we don’t share with other animals.
  • theoretical (concerning the contemplation of unchangeable truths)
  • ractical
  • intellectual virtues
  • virtues of character
  • Excess and deficiency
  • unction argument
  • erything in the universe had a purpose
  • essential nature of a thing or creature: just like the purpose of an acorn was to develop into an oak tree, that of human beings was to develop their unique human capacities, the most important of which was the ability to reason
  • in true Aristotelian spirit, is a mean between ‘anything goes’ and a totally prescriptiv
Daryl Bambic

The Art Instinct : The Frontal Cortex - 0 views

    • Daryl Bambic
       
      art (beauty) has an evolutionary role
  • n each case, people craved a painting that featured a large body of blue water, some open grass, a human figure and a few animals.
  • the survey results reveal our hard-wired preferences, which developed when we were Pleistocene hunter-gatherers roaming the African savannah. The landscapes we find most beautiful are simply those from which we evolved. If we like paintings with a foreground of short grasses, it's because that habitat contains more protein per square mile than any other, which is a crucial perk for a meat-eating primate.
Kelsey Adams

Turkeys: Factory-Farmed Torture on the Holiday Table | PETA.org - 1 views

  • More than 273 million turkeys are raised for food every year in the U.S.; about 79 million of them are slaughtered and eaten for Thanksgiving, Christmas, and Easter.(8,9) Before ending up as holiday centerpieces, these gentle birds spend five to six months on factory farms, where thousands of turkeys are packed into dark sheds with no more than 3.5 square feet of space per bird.(10) To keep the extremely crowded birds from scratching and pecking each other to death, workers cut off portions of the birds’ toes and upper beaks with hot blades and desnood the males (the snood is the flap of skin that runs from the beak to the chest).(11) No painkillers are used during these procedures.
  • Genetic manipulation and antibiotics enable farmers to produce heavily muscled birds who can weigh 35 pounds in as little as five months, and “their internal organs are noticeably crammed together in the little bit of space remaining for the body cavity,
  • a stress-induced condition that causes young birds to simply stop eating.
  •  
    This website explains how turkeys are tortured in small dark factories until they are all stuffed up and prepared to be slaughtered.
  •  
    Highlight the important parts.
steven bloom

Animal Rights Uncompromised: Caged Birds | PETA.org - 1 views

  •  
    This website talks about how we kill birds for no point. For examples when birds are smuggled into the Usa they have their wings clipped and their beaks shut so we can cram them in tight. Then the 20 percent of birds who survive and are over 8 weeks old are put in a cage for eternity. They have no contact and die alone. Can you imagine having no contact after eight weeks of birth to me that sounds like torture. All the information was provided by the Los Angeles times a notable newspaper.
  •  
    This is the same site.
steven bloom

Animals share everything with us why not rights - 2 views

  •  
    This website just talks our two main principle life and liberty. This website also says that since we have been sharing the earth with all these creatures over many years then they have the right to live also. This is actually an argumentitive essay and if you sign up to the website you will bbe able to see teh whole essay and all his points
  •  
    This website's credibility is questionable. Please don't put too much stock in this.
  •  
    What the website fails to mention is that nature is composed of food chains. The top of the food chain are smart/stronger and therefore are superior. We are also part of a food chain. Thanks to our superior intelligence and technology, we are therefore superior.
Daryl Bambic

Philosophy of Love [Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] - 0 views

shared by Daryl Bambic on 29 Jan 14 - No Cached
  • the contemplation of beauty in itself.
  • eros is that ideal beauty,
  • interchangeable across people and things, ideas, and art:
  • ...10 more annotations...
  • Physical desire, they note, is held in common with the animal kingdom. Hence, it is of a lower order of reaction and stimulus than a rationally induced love-
  • fondness and appreciation of the other
  • friendship, but also loyalties to family and polis-one's political community, job, or discipline.
  • uggesting that the proper basis for philia is objective: those who share our dispositions, who bear no grudges, who seek what we do, who are temperate, and just, who admire us appropriately as we admire them, and so on.
  • Friendships of a lesser quality may also be based on the pleasure or utility that is derived from another's company.
  • The first condition for the highest form of Aristotelian love is that a man loves himself.
  • reflection of his pursuit of the noble and virtuous, which culminate in the pursuit of the reflective life
  • Agape refers to the paternal love
  • brotherly love for all humanity.
  • logic of mutual reciprocity
Daryl Bambic

The Psychology and Philosophy of Wonder | Outre monde - 1 views

  • By drawing us out of ourselves, wonder does make us feel small and insignificant, but it also gives us right perspective by reconnecting us with something much greater and vaster and higher and better than our daily struggles. Wonder is the ultimate homecoming, returning us to the world that we came from and were in danger of losing.
    • Daryl Bambic
       
      Does this sound like the world of Forms?
  • Socratic wonder is not so much wonder in the sense of awe, but, as hinted by Aristotle, wonder in the sense of puzzlement or perplexity: wonder that arises from contradictions in thought and language, and gives rise to a desire to resolve or at least understand these contradictions.
  • Socrates himself only turned to philosophy after being puzzled by the Delphic Oracle, which, though he believed himself to be ignorant, pronounced him to be the wisest of all men.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • “I am likely to be wiser than he to this small extent, that I do not think I know what I do not know.”
  • Wonder is a universal experience, found also in children and perhaps even in higher-order primates and other animals
  • of wonder share a concern for what is in some sense beyond us, or beyond our grasp.
  • and the end of wonder is wisdom, which is the state of perpetual wonder.
    • Daryl Bambic
       
      The most lovely definition of wisdom I have seen: a perpetual state of wonder.
1 - 20 of 22 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page