Ethical Issues - 0 views

• 
  #1 Song Hagan on 08 Dec 13

   

  What is right and what's wrong? Who determines what is morally appropriate? How does one work so that one does not repent afterwards? This ethical problem has-been the subject of conversation since ages and most of us run into crossroads in our life when we're unable to decide regarding the morally appropriate action. I want to discuss this with a hypothetical example.
  
  In my case, I have a couple of deeply in-love with one another. The husband is very protective and can't bear some one also considering his wife. The wife is an ignorant lady with no understanding of any trade. Both love each other very deeply. One terrible day, the husband is diagnosed with cancer and may die or even treated instantly. The family has no savings and the husband loses his job as a result of his illness. The wife is hopeless and doesn't know very well what to do? For her the near future means watching her husband die slowly and surely.
  
  One fine morning, the wife announces that she has got some sort of night job, that'll pay for the treatments. She provides rough description of the money and job begins to arrive. The drugs get purchased and hope returns again about the life of the husband. My father found out about http://blog.savemarriagecentral.com/my-wife-doesnt-love-me-so-is-your-marriage-really-worth-it by searching newspapers. As headed, the man comes to know that the wife was prostituting her body to get money to save him. H-e confronts the wife and she confesses and raises the question - I'd two choices. Often to hold back and watch you dying or sell myself but save you. The husband is hurt beyond measure and really wants to know if she was privy to his protective nature? The wife says that she hates himself more everyday and understands everything. Requires shower hundreds of times to cleanse herself, but cannot wash the mutilation her human anatomy goes through. But that is better than your death, says the wife. 1 day after that, the man commits suicide after the wife leaves home. After her get back, she also commits suicide.
  
  Who had been morally right? Or both were right? Or both were wrong? Would it not have been safer to commit suicide after realizing that there were no options right initially? We are able to think about all the different options and may possibly never reach a conclusion of that which was morally right? Or all of us can reach his/her own conclusion dependant on one's thought about what's moral and what's wrong.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">What is right and what's wrong? Who determines what is morally appropriate? How does one work so that one does not repent afterwards? This ethical problem has-been the subject of conversation since ages and most of us run into crossroads in our life when we're unable to decide regarding the morally appropriate action. I want to discuss this with a hypothetical example. <br /> <br /> In my case, I have a couple of deeply in-love with one another. The husband is very protective and can't bear some one also considering his wife. The wife is an ignorant lady with no understanding of any trade. Both love each other very deeply. One terrible day, the husband is diagnosed with cancer and may die or even treated instantly. The family has no savings and the husband loses his job as a result of his illness. The wife is hopeless and doesn't know very well what to do? For her the near future means watching her husband die slowly and surely. <br /> <br /> One fine morning, the wife announces that she has got some sort of night job, that'll pay for the treatments. She provides rough description of the money and job begins to arrive. The drugs get purchased and hope returns again about the life of the husband. My father found out about <a href="http://blog.savemarriagecentral.com/my-wife-doesnt-love-me-so-is-your-marriage-really-worth-it/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.savemarriagecentral.com/my-wife-doesnt-love-me-so-is-your-marriage-really-worth-it</a> by searching newspapers. As headed, the man comes to know that the wife was prostituting her body to get money to save him. H-e confronts the wife and she confesses and raises the question - I'd two choices. Often to hold back and watch you dying or sell myself but save you. The husband is hurt beyond measure and really wants to know if she was privy to his protective nature? The wife says that she hates himself more everyday and understands everything. Requires shower hundreds of times to cleanse herself, but cannot wash the mutilation her human anatomy goes through. But that is better than your death, says the wife. 1 day after that, the man commits suicide after the wife leaves home. After her get back, she also commits suicide. <br /> <br /> Who had been morally right? Or both were right? Or both were wrong? Would it not have been safer to commit suicide after realizing that there were no options right initially? We are able to think about all the different options and may possibly never reach a conclusion of that which was morally right? Or all of us can reach his/her own conclusion dependant on one's thought about what's moral and what's wrong.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top