Group items tagged

Hezaveh et al simulate ALMA cycle 1 (ie 0.16" resolution) observations of Herschel/SPT sub mm lensed galaxies, and claim that the magnification is high enough, and the sources likely to be complex enough, to enable the detection of at least one DM subhalo of mass 10^8 or greater *in every system*

Epic paper by Sluse et al, on high precision astrometry in lensed quasar systems. Attention optical astronomers! They deconvolve their images! And get very small error bars as a result. Interesting claim about being able to quantify the lens environment (the dreaded "external covergence"). This is the biggest systematic error in H0/w determination - great if we can reduce it further through improved lens modelling.

A good overview of the current status of weak lensing shape measurement software.

Intended for the next lensing lunch by the way.

"Observations of lensing of the 21-cm background from the dark ages will be capable of detecting M>~10^12 Msun/h mass halos, but will require futuristic experiments to overcome the contaminating sources."

Combining galaxy distribution / clustering measurements with weak lensing shear measurements is a hot topic at the moment and this is the latest attempt to use both to reconstruct the COSMOS density field.

From N-body simulation, the authors find that concentration-mass relation displays a turnover for group scale dark matter haloes, for the case of WDM particles with masses of the order ~0.25 keV. This may be interpreted as a hint for top-down structure formation on small scales. Is there any reionization mechanism in this scenario?

1)Because the size of the simulated boxes were ten times smaller in previous studies. 2)Weak lensing at scale below ~1arcsec could work. Their results might be helpful for estimating non-linear power spectrum based on a certain halo model.

Cooool. Was Malin there this morning? This could be right up her street, with her flexion stuff! Also, weak lensing at < 1" sounds a bit like strong lensing to me - I'll read the paper in detail and see if there's anything we can already say from our (admittedly modest) SDSS samples. Thanks!

The current upper limit on the tensor-to-scalar ratio r is ~0.2, and should improve by an order of magnitude with future experiments. These authors claim that measuring the curl component of the lensing power spectrum of 21cm emission could yield incredible constraints r~10^(-9) (though this headline figure corresponds to their most optimistic case). The angular resolution of our planned 21cm telescopes is the crucial quantity in determining these constraints.

This is a very thought-provoking paper. At z=50 - the redshifted wavelength of HI is 21 cm * 51 which is 21m [about the length of a cricket wicket]. To image fluctuations you would need to space antennae by about half a wavelength, or by ~10 m. So far, so good, LOFAR is trying this already, filling many cricket pitches worth of land with antennae in Northern Holland. The UK even has its own little version at Chilbolton near Winchester. So far, so good. However, to get to r~10^-9 you need (apparently) to get to l_ max ~ 10^7, or an angular resolution of about 0.01 arcsec (Better than Hubble Space Telescope resolution). This means that, according to lambda/D, the total size of your 21-cm instrument has to have a diameter of ~ [21 m] / (10^-7), or ~10-times larger than the Earth. Of course, the atmosphere is getting close to opaque at these wavelengths, and the radio frequency interference is so bad that you'd want to put such an instrument on the back side of the moon. Unfortunately, the moon isn't large enough either, so you'd have to launch (or remotely deploy) something ~10-times the size of the Earth into deep space. This might be quite expensive, but in the SKA project we have most of the machinery to simulate such an instrument if any of you theorists out there are interested in collaboration.

There's been quite a bit of discussion about this issue this summer, it came up at the Bologna dark matter meeting as well as the Aosta strong lensing workshop. Basically, in strong lens systems we infer *more* subhalos/satellites than CDM predicts for massive lens galaxies (the satellites cause "millilensing", where the quasar/radio source image fluxes are affected by the small amounts of additional magnification and demagnification). One suggested resolution to this problem is to include all the subhalos along the line of sight - Metcalf (2008) claimed this was the answer, and now Dan Dan Xu has tested this claim using the Millenium Simulation, and various assumptions for the satellite subhalo density profile.

This looks like it might be interesting - new optical spectra and Spitzer IR data for 4 galaxies at z=2 show that the dust in these systems is rather different than in the local universe. The high magnification provided gravitational lenses arranged in front of them helped a lot!

Well, alright it just looks like SMC dust instead of MW dust but still, cool that we can measure it in galaxies at z=2!

Valkenburg et al look at the way inhomogeneities in the universe introduce apparent uncertainty in dark energy measurements, if one assumes a homogeneous world model when interpreting distance measurements. They also point out that cosmic variance will lead to bias in w(a). Modeling the structure in the universe is important! My question: is weak lensing immune from these worries, since it involves treatment of all the inhomogeneities?

SPT lensing paper

Maybe an ACT insider could tell us more...

Suyu et al combine strong gravitational lensing and stellar kinematics data for a spiral galaxy to measure the mass of both the disk and the dark matter halo. The constraints are very strong - they find an oblate, flattened halo, and get a disk stellar mass with small uncertainty (0.1dex); when they compare this with the stellar mass from the disk colours and K-band magnitude they find that stellar population models with Chabrier IMF work, and Salpeter does not - the opposite to the case of massive elliptical galaxies.

Perhaps an ACT team member could give us a verdict on this?

Abstract: In the standard cosmological framework, the Hubble diagram is interpreted by assuming that the light emitted by standard candles propagates in a spatially homogeneous and isotropic spacetime. However, the light from "point sources" -- such as supernovae -- probes the universe on scales where the homogeneity principle is no longer valid.

The first detection of a filament.

Very nice. I'm a little surprised that it's the first detection - I swear some people working on this a few years ago. But maybe their detection wasn't significant enough. At least, they didn't get a Nature paper out of it!