Skip to main content

Home/ Outcome Measures in Occupational Therapy/ Group items tagged (AMPS)

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Emma Ratcliff

EBSCOhost: The application of client-centred occupational therapy for Korean children ... - 0 views

  •  
    Although a small study, draws on AMPS and COPM The aim of this paper was to investigate the effectiveness of client-centred occupational therapy using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) and the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). Both the COPM and the AMPS change scores demonstrated statistically significant improvement (p < 0.01) in occupational performance. Significant correlations were found between COPM - Performance and AMPS - Motor skills (r(s) = 0.64, p < 0.05), and COPM - Satisfaction and AMPS - Process skills (r(s) = 0.62, p < 0.05) in a group positive towards client-centred occupational therapy. The COPM was a valuable tool in guiding and measuring the client-centred occupational therapy for children with developmental disabilities.
Chloe Todd

Comparing the responsiveness of the assessment of motor process skills and the function... - 3 views

In Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, (2012), 79(3), 167-174. Authors: Fioravanti, A. M., Bordignon, C. M., Pettit, S. M., Woodhouse, L. J., & Ansley, B. J. The purpose of the journal was t...

Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Program evaluation Rehabilitation Treatment outcome

started by Chloe Todd on 08 Aug 12 no follow-up yet
Linda Robertson

Individualized outcome measures: a review of the literature. Donnelly C, Carswell A. - 2 views

  •  
    The purpose of this paper is to review six individualized outcome measures that have been identified in the rehabilitation and psychology literature. The measures include: the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills, McMaster (MAC) Toronto Arthritis, Goal Attainment Scaling, Target Complaints and the Patient Specific Functional Scale. The reliability, validity, responsiveness and clinical utility of each outcome measure was examined and critiqued. Each tool, to a varying degree, met the description of a standardized, client-centred outcome measure. Members of NZAOT can access this journal.
1 - 3 of 3
Showing 20 items per page