Protocol for Implementing Open Access Data - 0 views
-
information for the Internet community
- ...69 more annotations...
-
Science Commons’ experience in distributing a database licensing Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) file
-
reducing or eliminating the need to make the distinction between copyrightable and non-copyrightable elements
-
Requesting behavior, such as citation, through norms rather than as a legal requirement based on copyright or contracts, allows for different scientific disciplines to develop different norms for citation.
-
any obligations on the user of the data or database such as “copyleft” or “share alike”, or even the legal requirement to provide attribution
-
interoperation with databases and data not available under the Science Commons Open Access Data Protocol through metadata
-
owner provides metadata (as data) under this protocol so that the existence of the non-open access data is discoverable
-
“Licensing” a database typically means that the “copyrightable elements” of a database are made available under a copyright license
-
share-alike license on the copyrightable elements may be falsely assumed to operate on the factual contents of a database
-
query across tens of thousands of data records across the web might return a result which itself populates a new database
-
selective waiving of intellectual property rights fail to provide a high degree of legal certainty and ease of use
-
apply a “copyleft” term to the copyrightable elements of a database, in hopes that those elements result in additional open access database elements coming online
-
Would a scientist need to attribute 40,000 data depositors in the event of a query across 40,000 data sets?