Justia.com Opinion Summary: Plaintiffs alleged that they purchased billions of dollars worth of mobile handsets containing defendants' LCD panels and that the prices they paid for those handsets were artificially inflated because defendants had orchestrated a global conspiracy to fix the prices of LCD panels. The district court certified to the court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) "the question whether the application of California antitrust law to claims against defendants based on purchases that occurred outside California would violate the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution." Because the underlying conduct in this case involved not just the indirect purchase of price-fixed goods, but also the conspiratorial conduct that led to the sale of those goods, the court answered in the negative. To the extent a defendant's conspiratorial conduct was sufficiently connected to California, and was not "slight and casual," the application of California law to that conduct was "neither arbitrary nor fundamentally unfair," and the application of California law did not violate that defendant's rights under the Due Process Clause. Therefore, the court reversed the district court's order dismissing plaintiffs' California law claims and remanded for further proceedings.
1More
2More
Steve Ballmer: Consumers Are Our Number One Thing - Business Insider - 3 views
1More
Furious Over End Of Google Reader - Business Insider - 1 views
1More
Hubspot Presentation On Company Culture - Business Insider - 0 views
Ad industry threatens Firefox users with more ads if Mozilla moves on tracking plans | ... - 0 views
1More
Nebula Builds a Cloud Computer for the Masses - Businessweek - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
721 - 740
Next ›
Last »
Showing 20▼ items per page