Skip to main content

Home/ onlinelearning/ Group items tagged what

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Tesseract Learning

Microlearning: What is it not? - 0 views

  •  
    Many feel Microlearning is chunking large volumes of content to shorter pieces, while some opine that Microlearning is 5 minutes of video. Are these really Microlearning or is there more to Microlearning than what meets the eye? In this blog, I will share my understanding of what is not Microlearning and what makes for good Microlearning.
Tesseract Learning

Top 8 eLearning Trends For 2019 - 0 views

  •  
    The year 2018 has been quite hectic for eLearning with newer trends taking traction. What will unfold in 2019? What are the key trends to watch out for in the coming year? I will share my thoughts on the same in this article.
dominknow

What is an eLearning Authoring Tool? - 0 views

  •  
    Let's start with a simple definition: eLearning Authoring tools are used to create eLearning lessons. These tools have been around much longer than most people know. When asked, many guess that they started coming on the market recently or perhaps back in the 1990s. The truth is the National Science Foundation funded the first authoring tool, called PLATO, way back in 1960, and then another in 1967, called TICCIT. Both spawned many other authoring tools over the years.
Nathan Grimm

Twitter Teacher Conversation Aggregator - 3 views

  •  
    A widget that aggregates a bunch of different twitter conversations that teachers are having on twitter. It's a great way to display what your PLN is saying right from your blog.
Tesseract Learning

Striking a Nerve: The Benefits and Neurobiology of Story-Based Learning - 0 views

  •  
    Wanted to know what are the benefits of story-based-learning? Check the Striking a Nerve: The Benefits and Neurobiology of Story-Based Learning and be fully prepared for the year to come.
Tesseract Learning

The ARCS Model of Motivational Design - Tesseract Learning - 0 views

  •  
    When it comes to the efficacy of learning, other than course content and instructional design elements, what matters a lot is learner motivation. Well, you cannot control the learners' motivation but you can influence their levels of motivation for sure. You can either motivate the learners to learn or entirely kill their interest. As a learning experience designer, your influence is unlikely to be neutral. In this article, we will look at motivational design and specifically the ARCS model of motivational design.
Joh Fra03

Facebook as LMS? « Experiencing E-Learning - 0 views

  • I agree with Sarah that using social networking tools for a course increases the amount of interaction and probably encourages more assessment of how people interact together. I
  • I wonder for people who already use these tools if the community of a course would really feel any different than the community of their friends.
  • f we’re trying to create lifelong learners, then using social networking tools for learning might be more effective. It has a stronger intrinsic context for interacting with others than a more artificial classroom environment. Practice that is as close to real life as possible is more effective, so practicing using tools for learning in the real world should make it easier for students to transition out of the course and continue using the tools.
  • ...1 more annotation...
  • The field test for one of the courses I developed recently finished, and I got the initial feedback today. This is the first course where I have used blogs, wikis, and other tools. A lot of what students do for this course is outside of the LMS, but they also come back in for the discussion boards. One point in the feedback was that students had a hard time jumping back and forth between the blogs and the discussion boards. The conversations didn’t seem connected to each other, and the discussions “didn’t have a home.” It is one of the problems with all of these tools that everything is so scattered. RSS can aggregate a lot of content into one place, but you still have to be able to bounce back and forth between resources and connect it all. Using these tools creates a much less centralized experience than a traditional LMS.
Joh Fra03

On Open, distance, e-learning and other name confusion | Virtual Canuck - 0 views

  • Learner input into the place, strategies and content of the instructional program The system recognizes that its instructional program is not the same as the learnign that happens to the students no prerequisite learning requirements learners know and can influence the expected learning outcomes the system is scalable providing cost effective learning opportunity the system uses communications and information processing technologies effectively the system uses testing and evaluation to diagnose and help learners the system employs ‘distance’ in the positive development of learner autonomy the system works within the learners context and concentrates on enriching that context, not on bringing the student to specialized institutional learning contexts the system works with other community institutions and resources to enrich the “learning society”
  • access related criteria (finance,  age and prerequisite requirements etc) Place and pace of study Means - referring to choice of media to be used Structure of the program - defining learning objectives, what content to skip etc. Support services
Joh Fra03

Edublogers as a Network of Practice | Virtual Canuck - 0 views

  • Had a core group of either paid or highly motivated contributors • Members workplaces shared much common structural characteristics – similar job requirements, organization etc. • Strong norms of collective behaviour: Members shared common social codes and ‘best practices’ • Trust, affiliation and other affective characteristics were nourished • The network had means to collectively censure inappropriate behaviour • The NOP used an appropriate set of distributed tools to effectively accomplish these goals.
  • ou just start to blog, read blogs and comment on blogs with content related to education and/or learning. But it can be a lonely world if nobody reads your posts. Thus, an aspiring edublogger needs to develop the set of network relationships such that their posts are read and responded to – in essence becoming a full member of the NoP. This is perhaps best accomplished by reading the blogs of others, commenting on them, noting the Blog role listings of other edubloggers that favorite authors are following, reading and responding to and gradually moving into the existing flow. Then, through immersion into the network (caused mostly by allocating  time to read, and  talent to originate and respond) the Edublogger  learns what content is appreciated, commented on and that leads to ongoing discourse
Joh Fra03

Facebook 2.0 | EDUCAUSE CONNECT - 0 views

  • If nothing else, these reactions by users should end the notions, first, that there is no privacy on the Internet and, second, that youth have no interest in it. What remains fascinating is our ability to observe the re-creation of cultural norms whose existence in the physical world is largely assumed, repressed, or forgotten.
  • et’s “face” it: Facebook has built the site, and students use it; we in higher education should come to recognize that this universal commercial site is here to stay.
  • those of us in higher education should be thoughtful about the degree to which outsourcing restricts our control over our products and services in higher education. IT professionals—vice presidents and chief information officers especially—have a responsibility to raise critical questions and perhaps even to teach or coach their administrations about the long-term, and possibly unintended, deleterious consequences of decisions that seem so obvious from a business and financial perspective today. Surrounded by commercialism and its almost irresistible temptations, we must be careful not to sell our souls.
Joh Fra03

Interaction in Learner-Paced Learning - CIDER - 0 views

  • 63.6% for the 2002-2003 period. Completion rates for the same courses offered in seminar format (either through synchronous technologies or face-to-face) averaged 86.9% over the same period (Athabasca University, 2003, p.12).
  • Nor do we know how to create and structure collaborative activities within independent study courses so that desirable characteristics of both collaboration and learner pacing can be retained. Further, we know little about demographics, learning styles, attitudes, or lifestyles of students who are more likely to appreciate and participate in collaborative activities at a distance.
  • Face-to-face interviews
  • ...29 more annotations...
  • We also posted invitations on 17 applicable listservs for non-AU faculty to participate in telephone interviews about the topic.
  • Twenty-nine respondents were interviewed by telephone, two sent their replies via email, and one participated through an online audio conference with the help of a translator. 
  • students who are most motivated are also more likely to participate in collaborative activities and finish the course in quicker times. 
    • Joh Fra03
       
      students most motivated more participation
  • effective, collaborative and interactive activities must be designed and integrated
    • Joh Fra03
       
      collaborative and interactive activities added to the class
  • efforts must be expended by institutional staff to promote, monitor, coordinate, and assess these activities
    • Joh Fra03
       
      instructor interaction is needed
  • Requiring participation only makes sense if the learning outcomes that result are sufficient to justify the reduction in learner control and flexibility that accompanies such prescribed activities
    • Joh Fra03
       
      interaction must be justified in order for the learner to loose control
  • cooperative learning, which is somewhere in between, in the spectrum of learning, individual and collaborative learning. Cooperative learning, in my opinion, is to work with others, but you are not really dependent upon their input to complete your assignment or to progress in your studies. You cooperate with other students when they are there, and they can have some input into what you are learning, but you are not really dependent upon them.
    • Joh Fra03
       
      cooperative learning, not dependent upon other students in order to complete the assignment
  • I could do that in three ways: as individual, cooperative or collaborative learning
    • Joh Fra03
       
      implementation
  • I would write the task in slightly different ways. In individual learning, I would say, ‘Write down your thoughts on this and submit it to your teacher as an email.’ If I wrote it as a cooperative assignment, I would say something like this, ‘Discuss this with a colleague or a peer student. Using this discussion as a background, you should submit your assignment as an email to your teacher.’ If I should write it as the third alternative, collaborative learning, I would say something like this, ‘Contact a peer student and write the assignment together, and submit it as something you have written together to your teacher in an email.’
    • Joh Fra03
       
      differing forms of implementation
  • The respondent suggested that interaction need not be student-to-student within a particular course to be beneficial, but could consist of employee-employee or employee-employer interaction. Another respondent noted that a community necessary for lifelong learning has to exist outside of a single structure, stating: “Why should people want to be part of a community? I am not sure that course-based learning, unpaced or paced, is compelling enough to engage the learner in that context because the course is not the thing they are there for - the community is bigger than that. It is something that has drawn them into this
    • Joh Fra03
       
      student choise in community and collaboration
  • noting that is unlikely that sufficient numbers of students will be registered in low-enrollment courses and be at approximately the same place to make collaborative activities possible. One respondent argued that this activity therefore should be used only in large-enrolment courses, commenting: “A learning community is feasible with undergrad
    • Joh Fra03
       
      low enrollment andon participati
  • Students may choose to participate in online group activities instead of completing individual, written assignments. If they choose online activity, their participation is marked. Besides engaging in asynchronous discussions, these students are required to evaluate and critique a submission from one peer. Students can self-register in the discussions.
    • Joh Fra03
       
      choice of particiption in group activities
  •  About 40% of students choose the online discussion option in the current version of the course, compared to about 5% in the prior version, when facilitators were not used.
    • Joh Fra03
       
      more participation when moderator / instructor
  • The respondents in general were experienced online and distance learners. The average number of online courses completed by each student was 2.1 with a range from 0 to 19. The number of courses that were based on self-study (that included older print-based correspondence model courses) was only slightly lower (m=1.9 range from 0-29).
    • Joh Fra03
       
      variable how seasoned as online distance learners , or online courses in general
  • 24% reported working with friends, family, or co-workers. The majority of student respondents (71%) chose not to participate in the interactive components of their courses, which consisted mostly of online discussion groups. Of the respondents who did participate in asynchronous conferences, 24% read or posted responses daily, 53% participated once or twice per week; and the rest only a few times during the course. Most respondents (79%) contributed 4-5 postings in each course.
    • Joh Fra03
       
      results
  • Eighteen percent felt that participation would take too much time. A further 17% were not aware that discussion forums were available, 14% thought that participation would not significantly increase their learning, and 10% indicated that they felt they had nothing to contribute. About 10% of respondents cited a lack of recent posti
  • 78% of respondents either agreed or strongly agreed that they would interact with other students as long as they were able to proceed through the course at their own pace. When queried how they would like to interact, 70% preferred asynchronous media like email and computer conferencing, 27% preferred a combination of synchronous and asynchronous technologies, and only 3% preferred synchronous interaction alone (for example, audio conferences or face-to-face interaction).
  • 95% of student respondents reported a desire to access the work of students either currently or previously enrolled in the courses. About 77% of respondents indicated an interest in accessing animated student-content interaction devices such as a “ChatBot.” Only 25% of students felt that participation should be graded.
  • 49% indicated they would not; 29% indicated they would; and 22% were unsure. When queried for the reasons that they did not wish to engage in collaborative activities, 58% said they preferred to learn on their own. About 25% indicated that they have a strong support group at work or at home, and 17% provided a variety of other reasons.
  • student survey results indicate that peer collaboration in general, at least in the form of asynchronous discussion groups, is not perceived as an important part of the learning experience within Athabasca University undergraduate individualized study courses
  • significantly increase faculty and administrative costs to the institution
  • The ability of students in each course to “see” when other students are online, and engage each other in online chats
  • student assessment incentives
  • communicate with other students in their courses at learner-determined times, and with a degree of social presence that meets their individual needs
  • designed to allow students to work with other students enrolled in the course as well as other non-registered members within and outside of the learning community. Where required, systems should be designed to permit spontaneous formation of groups of 4-5 students at a particular point in a course to perform a specified group task, after which the group would dissolve. 
  • Students can locate learning partners and participate in a variety of informal discussion groups. Some of these may be directly related to course content, others to more general socializing, informal learning, employment and family concerns
  • “Study Buddy”
  • Anderson, T. (2003a). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research on Open and Distance Learning 4 (2). Retrieved September 2004 from: http://www.irrodl.org/content/v4.2/anderson.html
  • Hislop, G. (2000.) Working professionals as part-time online learners. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks 4 (2). Retrieved April 2003 from: http://www.aln.org/publications/jaln/v4n2/pdf/v4n2_hislop.pdf
  •  
    Good research on self-paced constructivism courses. Primary research
Joh Fra03

Democracy Now! | Toll From Deadly, Coordinated Mumbai Attacks Tops 170, Two Top Indian ... - 0 views

  • ARUN JAITLEY: We must follow the example of what United States did after 9/11. We are more vulnerable them and we must be a tough state and not a soft state. Out intelligence network, our security response, our legal framework all need an overhaul and all need a strengthening. When all of them see the political establishment is weak on terrorism, each one of them collapses. That’s where the basic change is required.
  • Right when this was occurring, the relationship between 9/11 and Mumbai began to be made by the media.
  • It means the state has to then follow the playbook laid out by the Bush Administration right after it experienced of course its 9/11. Which is to say you then go and start a war against an adversary that you claim did the attack and simultaneously, you begin to create a security apparatus inside your state to restrict the civil liberties of all people who live within that country.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • war against your own population. Where you start to restrict civil liberties far in excess of anything necessary
  • not trying to forecast the safety of the population into the near future
  • precisely because most of those attacks the have taken place in areas which afflicted the working poor, working-class, and middle-class people. This attack, for the first time, targeted places of the top elite.
  •  
    Scary b/c of our model
Joh Fra03

Peepel - More what does Peepel look like? - Online Office - 0 views

  •  
    Collaborative in real time, writing space
1 - 20 of 26 Next ›
Showing 20 items per page