Formula for Management - How to Become a Better Leader - 0 views

• 
  #1 Lanier Gardner on 23 Sep 13

   

  If you were to create a house, you'd start with a formula. This system proves of good use since it contains more than guidelines on the best way to create a house. In addition it describes the finished house. If you think anything, you will possibly want to check up about michael singleton leadership.
  
  Therefore, what does this have regarding leadership?
  
  Last month I asked an audience of leaders to share with me the characteristics of a great leader. Their responses were (in-the order gathered ):
  
  An excellent listener, commitment, love, shows understanding, a visionary, part product, trusting, strength, organized, knowledgeable, reliability, convincing, charisma, team-building, clarity of purpose, problem solver, attitude of service, leads by example, persistence, willing to act without full understanding, recognizes readers, regular, enables others, and adjusts to change. If you think you know anything at all, you will probably fancy to discover about www.mlsingleton.com/.
  
  I'll add that this is actually the same list when I ask this question that I get from other followers. From this comes some useful observations.
  
  1) Notice what the record includes. Most of these characteristics relate to the human side of authority. Get more on our favorite partner wiki by clicking http://www.mlsingleton.com/ discussion. That's interesting because I usually hear people minimize this side of authority with terms like 'gentle' o-r 'touchy feely.' Really, using these traits requires more strength than not.
  
  2) Notice what the list excludes. Missing from this record (and all lists from other programs) are features such as firm, mean, significant, small tempered, vindictive, hard, angry, tough, punitive, handling, severe, o-r questionable. And that's interesting since several popular representations of leadership emphasize a minumum of one of the 'difficult' features. Actually, these traits are the refuge of people who lack the strength (or the abilities) to apply the human side of control.
  
  3) How about you? How would you rate yourself as a leader set alongside the listing of positive traits? If you were to study the people who report to you, how would they describe your management? Could they list characteristics from the 'smooth' list or from the 'hard' list? Would you be efficient by improving upon the 'smooth' characteristics? And what about another leaders in your organization? Do they truly maximize human potential?
  
  Individuals want leaders who treat them with real compassion, courtesy, and respect. They want leaders who help them be effective. They want leaders who inspire them with a vision for a better world and show them how to get there. Get more about wholesale michael singleton by going to our splendid wiki.

   

  <div class="cArrow"> </div><div class="cContentInner">If you were to create a house, you'd start with a formula. This system proves of good use since it contains more than guidelines on the best way to create a house. In addition it describes the finished house. If you think anything, you will possibly want to check up about <a href="http://www.mlsingleton.com/" rel="nofollow">michael singleton leadership</a>. <br /> <br /> Therefore, what does this have regarding leadership? <br /> <br /> Last month I asked an audience of leaders to share with me the characteristics of a great leader. Their responses were (in-the order gathered ): <br /> <br /> An excellent listener, commitment, love, shows understanding, a visionary, part product, trusting, strength, organized, knowledgeable, reliability, convincing, charisma, team-building, clarity of purpose, problem solver, attitude of service, leads by example, persistence, willing to act without full understanding, recognizes readers, regular, enables others, and adjusts to change. If you think you know anything at all, you will probably fancy to discover about <a href="http://www.mlsingleton.com/" rel="nofollow">www.mlsingleton.com/</a>. <br /> <br /> I'll add that this is actually the same list when I ask this question that I get from other followers. From this comes some useful observations. <br /> <br /> 1) Notice what the record includes. Most of these characteristics relate to the human side of authority. Get more on our favorite partner wiki by clicking <a href="http://www.mlsingleton.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mlsingleton.com/ discussion</a>. That's interesting because I usually hear people minimize this side of authority with terms like 'gentle' o-r 'touchy feely.' Really, using these traits requires more strength than not. <br /> <br /> 2) Notice what the list excludes. Missing from this record (and all lists from other programs) are features such as firm, mean, significant, small tempered, vindictive, hard, angry, tough, punitive, handling, severe, o-r questionable. And that's interesting since several popular representations of leadership emphasize a minumum of one of the 'difficult' features. Actually, these traits are the refuge of people who lack the strength (or the abilities) to apply the human side of control. <br /> <br /> 3) How about you? How would you rate yourself as a leader set alongside the listing of positive traits? If you were to study the people who report to you, how would they describe your management? Could they list characteristics from the 'smooth' list or from the 'hard' list? Would you be efficient by improving upon the 'smooth' characteristics? And what about another leaders in your organization? Do they truly maximize human potential? <br /> <br /> Individuals want leaders who treat them with real compassion, courtesy, and respect. They want leaders who help them be effective. They want leaders who inspire them with a vision for a better world and show them how to get there. Get more about <a href="http://www.mlsingleton.com/" rel="nofollow">wholesale michael singleton</a> by going to our splendid wiki.</div>

  ...

  Cancel

To Top