Skip to main content

Home/ ODI Data Infrastructure, Institutions & Data Access Initiatives/ Group items tagged Diversity

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Ben Snaith

Diamond_theFirstCut_pdf.pdf - 0 views

  • Currently, we are also unable to ascertain the extent to which our data sample is representative of the workforce it is trying to capture. Although we are reporting on 80,804 contributions from 5,904 contributors, the response rate is relatively low (24.3% of those invited to submit data). The low response rate and self-selecting nature of Diamond means there is the possibility of bias in the data we present here. We are taking this into account and will consider it as we undertake an equality analysis 1 of the system one year on.
  • Diamond collects: • Actual diversity data (across six protected characteristic groups) from individuals (contributors) who have a role in making television, whether on- or off-screen; and • Perceived diversity data (across the six protected characteristics) of the on-screen contributors (i.e. diversity characteristics as viewers might perceive them).
  • Diamond is collecting: • Actual diversity data (from those making and appearing on television, including freelancers) and Perceived diversity data (how the viewer might perceive those they see on television) • Data across six protected characteristic groups: gender, gender identity, age, ethnicity, sexual orientation, and disability 2 • Data from those making a significant contribution to a programme • Data from original programmes only, commissioned by the current five Diamond broadcasters for UK transmission • Data from programmes across all genres (although we do not currently report on news and sport) broadcast on a total of 30 channels across the five Diamond broadcasters.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • Diamond diversity data is collected via the online platform Silvermouse, which is already used by many broadcasters and production companies to collect and manage other kinds of information about the programmes they make.
  • Diamond does not collect: • Data from programmes which have not been commissioned by the five Diamond broadcasters • Data on people working across broadcasting more generally, outside of production (in other words, our data are not overall workforce statistics ) • Data where it is impractical to do so and where relevant privacy notices cannot be given. (Diamond does not collect data from every person appearing on television as part of a crowd scene, for example.)
  •  
    This report provides an initial view of the data that has been collected and made available to CDN since Diamond went live on 15 August 2016.
Ben Snaith

TheDiamondReport_TheSecondCut_2018-FINAL.pdf - 0 views

  • CDN will seek partnership with others in the immediate sector and beyond who have an interest in, and access to, other relevant data sets, so that we might collaborate and find ways to integrate data, to build a bigger picture about diversity in the industry.
jeni10

UK Research and Development Roadmap - GOV.UK - 0 views

  • Another underutilised lever is procurement, in which government and public service providers can act as an early adopter and first customer for new technologies and ways of working.
  • Build on our innovation enabling infrastructure Innovation happens throughout the UK, but access to the right support and facilities is not consistently available. Wherever we have high-quality R&D infrastructure we need to take full advantage of this, by encouraging the creation of new innovation zones and clusters of innovative firms around existing infrastructure around the UK. We will consider the full range of levers in doing so, from direct funding, to business support, to government’s ability to convene different actors and promote new opportunities. We want to build on our Catapult Network’s existing performance, boosting the benefits the network brings to local economies and addressing major challenges such as net zero carbon emissions. We will review whether they should all continue in their current form, exploring the potential to seize new opportunities. We will consider the opportunities provided by PSREs and other publicly funded research institutes, including establishing how government can best drive innovation through these organisations, for example through proof of concept for innovations and better sharing of ideas. To support publicly funded research infrastructures to make the most of their innovations, we will establish a fund to invest in innovative public sector ideas and a new unit to scout for and develop these opportunities.
  • Taking forward our National Data Strategy, we will improve the access to trusted data resources at local and regional levels to improve the availability of evidence at those levels to give local leaders what they need to build robust R&D ecosystems.
  • ...4 more annotations...
  • Data that could drive new discoveries or innovation is not always as available as it could be.
  • make the most of PSREs, which have the potential to deliver broad public policy objectives and help innovation translation enable work across institutions to solve the grand challenges of our time make the most of our institutions, to use research to improve both UK and devolved policy outcomes and to measure and refine programme performance
  • Crucially, we must embrace the potential of open research practices. First, we will require that research outputs funded by the UK government are freely available to the taxpayer who funds research. Such open publication will also ensure that UK research is cited and built on all over the world. We will mandate open publication and strongly incentivise open data sharing where appropriate, so that reproducibility is enabled, and knowledge is shared and spread collaboratively. Second, we will ensure that more modern research outputs are recognised and rewarded. For example, we will ensure that digital software and datasets are properly recognised as research outputs, so that we can minimise efforts spent translating digital outputs into more traditional formats. Third, we will consider the case for new infrastructure to enable more effective sharing of knowledge between researchers and with industry to accelerate open innovation where possible.
  • PSREs and other publicly funded research institutes Public sector research establishments (PSREs) and other publicly funded institutes – including UKRI-funded institutes and institutes funded by the devolved administrations, are a diverse collection of bodies carrying out research. This research supports government objectives, including informing policy-making, statutory and regulatory functions and providing a national strategic resource in key areas of research. They can also provide emergency response services. They interact with businesses around a wide array of innovation-related functions. We want to get the most value out of the whole range of PSREs and publicly funded institutes, laboratories and campuses. The current PSRE and institute landscape is complex. There is an opportunity to raise awareness and support development of strategic national laboratory capability, develop closer relationships across the network of PSREs and institutes to address cross-cutting priorities and develop more consistent and co-ordinated, accessible funding for PSREs. Most programmes do not include funding for the full costs of overheads – this sometimes prevents our national laboratories from participating in UK government priority programmes without making a loss. A more flexible approach and funding a higher proportion of the economic costs would increase spending efficiency and encourage more effective investments and maximise their benefits. Building on the 2019 Science Capability Review, we will: champion the development of a truly strategic, national laboratory capability and identify opportunities to strengthen their capabilities and ability to collaborate, especially with the private sector, devolved administrations and local civic authorities work to understand current capacity and capability, including spare capability, and to ensure that national labs, PSREs and other publicly funded institutes are working together as part of business as usual rather than only in times of crisis explore the potential for all PSREs to have access to more funding opportunities from UKRI so that PSREs are viewed as national assets rather than the property of UK government departments
Ben Snaith

AnnualReport2018LandPortal.pdf - 0 views

shared by Ben Snaith on 01 Jun 20 - No Cached
  • We are proud to say that the Land Portal has become far and wide the world’s leading source of data and information on land, with more than 30,000 visits a month, a majority of which are from the Global South. The Land Portal now counts more than 760 land-related indicators from 45 datasets aggregated from trusted sources around the world. This great diversity of information feeds into a dozen thematic portfolios and more than 60 country portfolios that combine data with the latest news, relevant publications, organizations and more.
  • Land Portal is leading the way on the adoption of open data and making land governance information more accessible. We brought together the land governance community for the Partnership for Action workshop to set the stage for building an information ecosystem on land governance, resulting in an action plan on data collection, management and dissemination. The Land Portal’s approach to capacity building was further refined at a workshop in Pretoria, South Africa, which created a great deal of momentum to adopt open data practices in this country
  • We are grateful for the United Kingdom’s Department for International Development (DFID) steadfast support, as well as the support of the Omidyar Network. We are also thankful for the support of Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), GIZ - German Cooperation and the collaboration of all of our partners, without which our work would not be possible
1 - 4 of 4
Showing 20 items per page