Rule 201. Judicial Notice of Adjudicative Facts
(a) Scope of rule.—This rule governs only judicial notice of adju-
dicative facts.
(b) Kinds of facts.—A judicially noticed fact must be one not
subject to reasonable dispute in that it is either (1) generally
known within the territorial jurisdiction of the trial court or (2
Group items matching
in title, tags, annotations or urlFEDERAL RULES EVIDENCE - 0 views
-
-
capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy cannot reasonably be questioned
Performance Measurement for Justice Information System Projects - 0 views
-
Congress enacted the GPRA in 1993 to make the managers of federal agencies accountable for the results of agency and program activities. The Act requires the establishment of measurable agency and program goals through the development of long-term strategic plans and annual per- formance plans and requires each agency to issue an Annual Performance Report detailing actual results compared to performance goals. To meet the requirements of GPRA, BJA must annually provide performance measures capturing the value of its funding programs to OMB.
Google - 0 views
-
C18 District Attorney-Victim Witness: Adopt a resolution which authorizes the District Attorney to continue as the agent for Shasta County to conduct negotiations, sign an agreement in the amount of $832,996, and submit to the State documents necessary for continuation of the Victim Witness Claims Unit for the period July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2009.
Oregon Judicial Department Appellate Court Opinions - 0 views
-
We pause to recall our standard of review. We review the denial of a motion to suppress for errors of law, deferring to the trial court's findings of historical fact when there is evidence in the record to support them. Ehly, 317 Or at 75.
University of Minnesota Human Rights Library - 0 views
-
3.3 Finally, counsel claims that the failure of the State party to ensure a prompt and impartial investigation of allegations of torture in connection with the death of Mr. Akhimien, as well as the failure to ensure that the family of the deceased received adequate compensation, constitute violations of articles 12, 13 and 14 of the Convention. http://209.85.173.132/u/uofmn?q=cache:-gvBJa5NKegJ:www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cat/decisions/67-1997.html+coroner+tort+cases&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8
257-266.pdf - Powered by Google Docs - 0 views
« First
‹ Previous
181 - 191 of 191
Showing 20▼ items per page