Skip to main content

Home/ New Media Ethics 2009 course/ Warning over 'surveillance state'
Paul Melissa

Warning over 'surveillance state' - 9 views

Privacy Surveillance

started by Paul Melissa on 08 Sep 09
  • Paul Melissa
     
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7872425.stm

    The article effectively speaks of how CCTV cameras and DNA database are threats to privacy. Though many states have reasoned them for being a 'vital' tool to fight crimes like terrorism, civil liberties campaigners said abuses of power mean "even the innocent have a lot to fear".

    Ethical questions:

    Where is the line to be drawn to strike a balance between fighting crimes to protect the public while ensuring there are effective safeguards and a solid legal framework to protect civil liberties.

    Should there be a new breed of 'checks and balances' third party group to prevent the state from over-stepping their boundaries?

    Do users have a right to privacy and confidentiality of their data communications that takes priority over the national security interests of a legitimate government?

To Top

Start a New Topic » « Back to the New Media Ethics 2009 course group