Skip to main content

Home/ Netpolitique/ Group items tagged post

Rss Feed Group items tagged

Rem Palpitt

Tweest by Le Post : des rivières de flux Twitter sélectionnés (par @eni_kao) - 0 views

  •  
    Le Post et la Netscouade présenteront ce soir à la Cantine un outil pour suivre les personnalités politiques françaises sur Twitter en un lieu unique et effectuer des tris par parti : Tweest. (NDLA : pour le moment pas encore ouvert).
Arnault Coulet

Le site web de la présidence sera opérationnel après les régionales (via @fon... - 0 views

  • Le site web de la présidence sera opérationnel après les régionales Nicolas Sarkozy, Franck Louvrier, Web, Politique Par pierre-alain le 06/03/2010 à 17:29, vu 1152 fois, 4  Franck Louvrier , conseiller en communication de Nicolas Sarkozy indique à l' Express.fr, que la nouvelle version du site de la présidence (elysee.fr) sera opérationnel au lendemain des élections régionales.Mais pourquoi cette date?Simplement "pour éviter une polémique", dixit le conseiller en communication.Pourtant, comme le rappelle le site, le chef de l'Etat doit donner une interview au Figaro magazine, le 13 mars prochain, soit la veille du premier tour...Et le lancement de cette formule de elysee.fr se fait vraiment désirer... Il a été repoussé à deux reprises, indique L'Express.fr... Suspense donc!
Arnault Coulet

Rebooting Sweden ? (@thieulin) Comment une jeune bloggeuse suédoise boulevers... - 0 views

  • Les "Swedish Netroots" - c'est ainsi qu'ils se baptisent eux-mêmes - sont très actifs mais ont souvent du mal à percer dans les autres médias. Il y a trois jours, un pallier a toutefois été franchi. Emilie, une jeune bloggeuse, a écrit un billet revenant sur la perte de l'assurance santé de sa mère. En Suède, l'Etat providence est fort et d'importants programmes nationaux couvrent les besoins des personnes ayant perdu leur emploi en raison d'un problème de santé.
  • Jusqu'à ces derniers jours, le blog d'Emilie ne provoquait pas l'attention particulière des internautes et plus généralement des Suédois. Mais quelques heures après ce billet intitulé Sveket (http://klamydiabrevet.blogspot.com/2010/09/sveket.html), tout a changé. En seulement une journée, il a été partagé 20 000 fois sur Facebook. Deux jours plus tard, les quotidiens du soir ont repris cette histoire dans leurs éditions, comme le relate sur dans son billet (http://www.americablog.com/2010/09/how-blog-post-is-changing-swedish.html), le célèbre blogueur américain, John Aravosis.
  • Hier matin, le plus grand titrage du pays, AftonBladet, plaçait cette histoire à la une de son édition.picture.Tout un dispositif digital s'est mis en place avec une page facebook dédiée et une vidéo virale sur Youtube relatant cette histoire.
stan mag

More on Twitter and protests in Tehran | Net Effect - 0 views

  • Overall, I am skeptical about the claims that Twitter has been instrumental in organizing the protests. I grant that it may have been very influential in publicizing them. But I'd like to see tangible evidence that 10 random Iranians found each other via Twitter and – communicating in Farsi –actually planned a rally. I think we are still short of this – most of the reports I've seen about the use of Twitter have focused mostly on the role it played in publicizing the violence or the already planned protests and rallies.
Rem Palpitt

Politics goes mobile | Pew Research - 1 views

  •  
    More than a quarter of American adults - 26% - used their cell phones to learn about or participate in the 2010 mid-term election campaign. In a post-election nationwide survey of adults, the Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project found that 82% of adults have cell phones. Of those cell owners, 71% use their phone for texting and 39% use the phone for accessing the internet. With that as context, the Pew Internet survey found that:
stan mag

L'observatoire hebdomadaire du web politique #14 : Spécial Tunisie | Facebook - 0 views

  •  
    "Les tenants de la Web révolution Nouvel Observateur, le Figaro, Le Monde : les plus ardents défenseurs d'un rôle décisif du web dans la révolution tunisienne sont, paradoxalement, les médias traditionnels. Le Web comme catalyseur de la « révolution » : le Nouvel Obs, par la voix de J-F Julliard, qualifie purement et simplement les événements actuels de « e-révolution », le mécontentement exprimé sur le Web ayant contribué à déloger le président tunisien. Le Monde, lui, publie une tribune d'un chercheur à l'IRIS, lequel affirme que le Web contribue à former des citoyens éclairés et politisés, donc rebelles. In fine, c'est donc bien le Web qui serait le catalyseur de la révolte. Enfin, certains médias algériens relaient par ailleurs la thèse selon laquelle Wikileaks et Facebook ont joué un rôle complémentaire dans le mécontentement : le premier en publiant certaines informations gênantes, l'autre en les popularisant. Le Web comme outil d'organisation : sur le Nouvel Obs, un article revient plus en détail sur l'organisation du mouvement via le Web, un Web devenu un « outil indispensable de l'opposant » en Tunisie. Numerama adopte le même ton : Internet aurait été en mesure de renverser le régime tunisien en raison de l'efficacité accrue de la mobilisation, une efficacité permise par le Web. Le Web comme transmetteur d'informations : par la voix de Pierre Haski (Rue89), l'AFP se range également dans le camp des tenants de la « Web révolution » : sans Internet, de telles émeutes ne seraient pas permises, notamment grâce la bonne circulation de l'information qui a rendu possible la diffusion de l'appel à la mobilisation. Les « pure players », incrédules À l'inverse, les sceptiques trouvent leur place au sein des pure-players et medias spécialisés. Les blogs comme Netpolitique, Meilcour ou Guy Birenbaum figurent parmi ces incrédules. Le Web ne fait que transmettre
Arnault Coulet

@digiactive what do you think about @evgenymorozov blog post "From slacktivism to activ... - 0 views

  • I've grown increasingly skeptical of numerous digital activism campaigns that attempt to change the world through Facebook and Twitter.
  • He started a Facebook group, which implied – but never stated so explicitly – that the city authorities were planning to dismantle the fountain, which of course was NEVER the case. He seeded the group to 125 friends who joined in a matter of hours; then it started spreading virally. In the first few days, it immediately went to a 1000 members and then it started growing more aggressively. After 3 days, it began to grow with over 2 new members each minute in the day time. When the group reached 27.500 members, Jørgensen decided to end the experiment. So there you have it: almost 28,000 people joined a cause that didn't really exist!
  • "just like we need stuff to furnish our homes to show who we are, on Facebook we need cultural objects that put together a version of me that I would like to present to the public."
  • ...13 more annotations...
  • acebook users shape their online identity implicitly rather than explicitly
  • This shopping binge in an online identity supermarket has led to the proliferation of what I call “slacktivism”, where our digital effort make us feel very useful and important but have zero social impact
  • In a perfect world, this shouldn't even be considered a problem: better donate a penny than not to donate at all. The problem, however, is that the granularity of contemporary digital activism provides too many easy way-outs: too many people decide to donate a penny where they may otherwise want to donate a dollar
  • The problem is that most of these campaigns do not have clear goals or agenda items beyond awareness-raising.
  • Asking for money could also undermine one's efforts to engage groups members in more meaningful real-life activities: the fact that they have already donated some money, no matter how little, makes them feel as if they have already done their bit and should be left alone
  • Some grassroots campaigns are beginning to realize it: for example, the web-site of "Free Monem", a 2007 pan-Arab initiative to free an Egyptian blogger from jail carried a sign that said “DON'T DONATE; Take action” and had logos of Visa and MasterCard in a crossed red circle in the background
  • his was a way to show that their campaign needed more than money as well as to shame numerous local and international NGOs that like to raise money to “release bloggers from jail”, without having any meaningful impact on the situation on the ground.
  • Psychologists offer an interesting explanation as to why a million people working together may be less effective than one person working alone. They call this phenomenon “social loafing”.
  • Reading about Ringelmann's experiments, I realized that the same problem plagues much of today's “Facebook” activism:
  • For example, FreeRice, a web-site affiliated with the UN Food Program
  • This is a brilliant approach: millions of people rely on the Internet to study English anyway and most of them wouldn't mind being exposed to online advertising in exchange for a useful service. Both sides benefit, with no high words exchanged. Those who participate in the effort are not driven by helping the world and have a very selfish motivation; yet, they probably generate more good than thousands of people who are “fighting” hunger via Facebook. While this model may not be applicable to every situation, it's by finding practical hybrid models like FreeRice's that we could convert immense and undeniable collective energy of Internet users into tangible social change.
  • on't give people their identity trophies until they have proved their worth
    • Arnault Coulet
       
      clé
  • create diverse, distinctive, and non-trivial tasks; your supporters can do more than just click “send to all” button” all day.
    • Arnault Coulet
       
      second point
Arnault Coulet

Obama's Facebook "Townhall": What Exactly Was That? | - 0 views

  • If this was meant to be a public conversation, why take so few questions from the web? Was the point here to give Facebook employees a chance to interact with the president, while we watch? Did it really make sense to have Zuckerberg, the owner of the platform, ask the questions (and, it seems, possibly pick them)? For all those people newly paying attention, you have to wonder whether they were encouraged to come back and do it again. In a bit of bad timing for both the White House and Facebook, this happened to be the day that all over the news were comments of a Facebook staffer suggesting that perhaps they had been allowing "too much, maybe, free speech" in countries not accustomed to the free flow of information we enjoy here in the States.
stan mag

voter et faire voter via les réseaux - - 0 views

  •  
    US campaign: "one in five people contacted by a Facebook friend acted on a get out the vote request because they were contacted by someone they knew."
1 - 20 of 47 Next › Last »
Showing 20 items per page