Skip to main content

Home/ Ms. Thornborrow4thHourComposition/ Contents contributed and discussions participated by samantha maciej

Contents contributed and discussions participated by samantha maciej

samantha maciej

2012 London Olympics: Economic Benefits Not What You Think - 0 views

  • Instead of luring money to the city, it actually drives out the usual spenders and decreases tourism, drastically reducing revenue for local businesses. That means host cities hardly ever recoup the costs it takes to prepare for holding the Olympic Games. 
  • Montreal, which hosted the 1976 Olympics, is the best example of the negative economic side effects of the Olympics. 
  • 58% said the Games would have no impact on business,
  • ...15 more annotations...
  • Mismanagement and unexpected costs left the city's citizens with a $1.5 billion debt that took three decades to erase. The final payment on the debt was made in 2006.
    • samantha maciej
       
      read here
  • Not only is a tourism decline hurting the city's revenue; London is already in debt because the cost of Olympics hosting starts with the bidding process.
  • "Our business is down by about 20-40 percent depending on the time of day," Steve McNamara, general secretary of the Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, told the AFP. "Normally about 90 percent of our customers are Londoners but they've all left the city and haven't been replaced by tourists.
  • This process is driven by private interest groups supporting construction, architecture, bankers and lawyers who care little for London's fiscal well-being and more for their own pockets. That means they pressure the city to overbid.
  • host cities tend to be captured by private interests who end up promising much more than the city can afford." 
  • Chicago, during its three-year bid process, spent $100 million on advertising, preparing venues for inspection, and promotions
  • The British government has raised its 2012 London Olympics budget estimate to nearly $15 billion - almost four times the initial amount of $4 billion.
  • And each year, the cost of hosting gets higher.
  • It is a common trend for host cities to understate budgets.
  • Atlanta spent $2.4 billion in 1996. Sydney spent $6.8 billion in 2000 and is still trying to fill the rooms it built. Athens, which spent $16 billion in 2004, has venues that are in disrepair because it cost hundreds of millions to maintain them. 
  • Then there's always the fear the exposure will cast an unappealing light on the city, driving away future tourists.
  • "Should the Games be plagued by disorganization (e.g., the current security snafu in London), the pervasive pollution of Beijing, the violence of Munich, Mexico City or Atlanta, or the corruption scandals of Salt Lake City and Nagano, then the PR effect might be negative," said Zimbalist.
  • Bottom Line: "I think the Olympics is and should be a great sporting event, but it is not and should not be considered a major economic event," said University of Michigan's Szymanski.  "It's a lot like having a party. It's a good time but it doesn't make you rich."
  • The only instances of success have been Barcelona, which did enjoy a significant tourism boom following the 1992 games, and Los Angeles, which hosted the 1984 games and already had the infrastructure and venues needed. But two examples of success are hardly anything to brag about.
samantha maciej

Do the Olympics Boost the Economy? Studies Show the Impact is Likely Negative - The Dai... - 0 views

  • Twenty-one out of 22 of the stadiums, arenas, sports halls and swimming pools built for the Games are either derelict, in a state of disrepair, boarded up or unable to find a buyer and underused.
  • Athens faced a bill estimated at $784 million simply to maintain this ghost town of Olympian extravagance
  • “Immediately following the Games, the positive employment effect moved into reverse. In the three months after the Games, September–November 2004, Greek industry lost 70,000 jobs, the majority in construction.
  • ...11 more annotations...
  • A Lasting Legacy for London? Assessing the Legacy of the Olympic and Paralympic Games,
  • “In terms of purely measurable economic variables the Sydney Olympics had a negative effect on New South Wales and Australia as a whole.” According to Giesecke and Madde
  • “Diverting scarce capital and other resources from more productive uses to the Olympics very likely translates into slower rates of economic growth than that which could be realized in the absence of hosting the Olympic Games.” 
  • There appears to be little evidence of any benefit to tourism of hosting an Olympic Games, and considerable evidence of damage
  • But except for a dedicated few, there will be little desire to visit them subsequently. Instead, within a few months, all eyes will be on Rio de Janeiro, host of the 2016 Games
  • In 1996 in Georgia, home state of host city Atlanta, hotel occupancy rates fell from 73 percent in the previous year to 68 percent.
  • Sydney 2000 saw hotel occupancy fall steadily as the Games approached, from 83 percent in March to 68 percent in July and August, before a modest recovery to 80 percent during the Games themselves
  • “Olympic visitors effectively scare other visitors away. Regular tourists assume that congestion and increased prices are a feature of Mega-Events.”
  • “During the Olympic period, the entire bed-stock of a destination is devoted to the travelling officials, the press and spectators. These visitors are unlike “regular” tourists, having different spending and behavior patterns. They are not interested in “tourism”—they are interested in sport. They tend not to spend money on leisure and entertainment, and when not in the stadia they watch events on TV rather than engaging in other activities.”
  • Any financial benefit from Olympic tourism is almost exclusively short-term and hotel-specific, jacking up the room prices for a few weeks for a clientele who are unlikely ever to visit again, as they move on to the next major sporting event.
  • Spend billions that should go to schools, roads and other infrastructure?
samantha maciej

Nadzeya Ostapchuk of Belarus Stripped of Olympic Gold Medal for Doping - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • Nadzeya Ostapchuk of Belarus was stripped of her gold medal in the shot-put Monday morning for testing positive for an anabolic steroid
  • Ostapchuk was competing in her third Olympics; she finished fourth in Athens in 2004 and got a bronze in Beijing in 2008
  • Ghfran Almouhamad, a female hurdler from Syria who tested positive for a banned stimulant; and the American judo fighter Nick Delpopolo, who tested positive for marijuana.
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • He said his positive test “was caused by my inadvertent consumption of food that I did not realize had been baked with marijuana, before I left for the Olympic Games.”
  • everal other athletes were sanctioned for doping right before the Games, including the gymnast Luiza Galiulina of Uzbekistan and the weight lifter Hysen Pulaku of Albania.
samantha maciej

Olympic Badminton Teams Ousted for Throwing Matches - NYTimes.com - 0 views

  • On Wednesday, four women’s doubles teams — two from South Korea and one each from China and Indonesia — were disqualified.
  • The eight players were found to have tried to lose their matches intentionally, apparently because they had determined that a loss would allow them to play a weaker opponent in the next round.
  • “The rules say you have to win every match, and that doesn’t mean you throw some matches and win other matches,” said Thomas Lund
  • ...2 more annotations...
  • But athletes and coaches have always looked for any available advantage, including throwing a match to save energy or to face an easier opponent in the next round.
  • During one match, a Danish umpire took the drastic step of flashing a black card to warn the players that they could be thrown out.
samantha maciej

Olympic Games | Scholastic.com - 0 views

  • except during World War I and World War II (1916, 1940, 1944).
  • whereas the modern Games are a manner of saluting the athletic talents of citizens of all nations.
  • there is a large potential for corruption. In fact, a scandal erupted in late 1998, when it was found that promoters involved with Salt Lake City's (winning) bid for the 2002 Winter Games had bribed IOC members, who were forced to resign; the Nagano and Sydney bids were also under suspicion of bribery.
  • ...7 more annotations...
  • Originally, Olympic athletes were expected to remain strictly amateurs and not earn money even for endorsing products. However, by the last decades of the 20th century, professionalism among competitors received official acceptance,
  • all but precluding the holding of a full-time job.
  • With such great rewards at stake, there are athletes and even national sports programs willing to use performance-enhancing drugs despite the risks to future health and the disgrace of getting caught.
  • During that time East German women suddenly dominated events such as swimming, winning medals in 11 of 13 events both in 1976 and 1980.
  • As drug testing procedures have improved, more athletes have been caught.
  • Ben Johnson tested positive; he was stripped of his gold medal
  • In the mid-1990s, China's female swimmers and runners quickly rose to the top of elite competition, arousing suspicions of drug use; by the late 1990s many were caught through more diligent drug testing.
samantha maciej

Hi-tech tests to catch Olympics drug cheats at London 2012 - CNN.com - 0 views

  • Marion Jones crosses the line first in the 100m final at the 2000 Olympics. It was one of three golds the American sprinter won in Sydney. In 2007, Jones admitted to taking banned substances and was stripped of her medals.
  • The race, his victory and his subsequent disqualification for taking the banned steroid stanozolol was one of the most infamous episodes in Olympic history.
  • Marion Jones and Ben Johnson are just two examples of champions whose achievements have been scrubbed from the record books due to drug scandals.
  • ...3 more annotations...
  • "If they are not caught now they can be caught within the next eight years because samples can be re-analyzed."
  • "There were 80-90 athletes who didn't go to Beijing because of pre-testing and I presume that the same sort of number might arise this time around."
  • "Yes we can, and we will."
    • samantha maciej
       
      Ben Johnson was an idol, but after using drugs he disappointed many.
samantha maciej

Olympic Game Cities - Host Cities for the Olympic Games - 0 views

  • 1900 - Paris, France
  • 1924 - Paris, France
  • Berlin, Germany*
  • ...9 more annotations...
  • 1936 - Berlin, Germany
  • 1916 - Scheduled for
  • 1908 - London, United Kingdom
  • 1944 - Scheduled for London, United Kingdom* 1948 - London, United Kingdom
  • 1932 - Los Angeles, United States
  • 1984 - Los Angeles, United States
  • 2012 - London, United Kingdom
  • 2004 - Athens, Greece
  • 1896 - Athens, Greece
samantha maciej

Pros and Cons of Hosting Olympic Games - 0 views

  • Yes! I surely think that the Olympics are money pit because all the money that the hosting country thinks it is investing, but they are truly wasting it, Like Atens 2004
  • When the games are finally over all those touristic places are empty and they can get into bankrupt.
  • Another unpleasant aspect of the Olympics is the tremendous cost for stadiums, security, and housing. Even after the games are over the doubt will continue and will lead to higher taxes on the city.
1 - 0 of 0
Showing 20 items per page